Anne-Laure Le Cunff Profile picture
Mar 2, 2022 β€’ 8 tweets β€’ 3 min read β€’ Read on X
Did you know that the higher your interest in neuroscience, the more likely you are to believe in neuromyths? πŸ€”

This month I'll try to dispel one neuromyth each day for the next 30 days 🧠 ⚑

01. You're not "right-brained" or "left-brained", you're whole-brained.

#NeuroMarch
Neuromyth: right-brained = creative; left-brained = analytical.

Reality πŸ‘‡ Image
02. Listening to classical music doesn't make kids smarter. Yes, the Mozart Effect shows a small improvement in spatial reasoning skills after listening to Mozart

But it only lasts for ~12 min & even the research team behind the original study got annoyed about that neuromyth πŸ˜… Image
03. You don't have a "learning style", e.g. learning better with visual, auditory, textual format etc.

You may have a learning *preference* but easier β‰  better. Students matched with their learning preference don't learn better πŸ‘‡ Image
04. A common neuromyth is the "myth of three", a "critical period" between age 0–3 determining the future trajectory of a child's cognitive maturation πŸ˜¨πŸ“ˆπŸ“‰

Sure, early education is often better, but we have many "sensitive periods" rather than one unique "critical period"! Image
05. It's the weekend so forgive me for the lazy one but... No, you don't only use 10% of your brain capacity, and any course claiming to help you "unlock your untapped brain potential" is just going to help you empty your wallet πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™€οΈ Image
06. The graph below is cute, but the theory of "Multiple Intelligences" invented by Harvard psychologist Howard Gardner is nonsense πŸ™„

There's no musical, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic intelligence. There's just general intelligence. Image
07. This is one I was fascinated with as a kid, but it turns out it's not true. No, it's not a common sign of dyslexia to see letters backwards πŸ”™

Instead, look for difficulty reading (including reading aloud) & writing, mispronouncing words, and/or problems retrieving words πŸ‘‡πŸ½ Image

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Anne-Laure Le Cunff

Anne-Laure Le Cunff Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @neuranne

Feb 1, 2023
I don't actually use that many mental models on an everyday basis, but this one has been the most helpful to me.

Think of your actions not as a scalar (magnitude) but as a vector (magnitude and direction).

Let me explain πŸ‘‡
Scientists call a β€œscalar” a quantity that can be fully described by its magnitude alone.

Speed is a scalar (β€œI’m driving 80 miles per hour”), and so are volume, mass, and time.

When you’re talking about how fast or how big something is, you’re describing it as a scalar.
In contrast, a vector is described by both its magnitude and its direction.

Velocity is an example of vector: it not only tells you *how fast* you’re going, but also *where* you’re going.

For instance, β€œI’m driving 80 miles per hour to the south.”
Read 6 tweets
Jan 11, 2023
The concept of meta-emotions is incredibly helpful to better accept and manage our feelings.

It's basically an emotional detangling tool πŸŒ€ Image
Say you worked hard to prepare for an interview for your dream job. You think it went well, anxiously wait, and then... You learn that you didn't get the job.

What happens? You probably feel a mix of emotions and don't even know where to start to untangle all those feelings.
That's where the concept of meta-emotions comes in. It helps you think about your emotions in terms of layers, e.g:

β€’ Emotion: feeling disappointed because you didn't get the job
β€’ Meta-emotion: feeling guilty about your disappointment, because other people "have it worse"
Read 4 tweets
Jul 5, 2022
This is such a shocking stat, but I can't find the original source: allegedly an 80% average of people across age brackets report their lives to be meaningless

What about folks on Twitter? Please answer the questions below πŸ™πŸ½ Image
Let's use an adaptation of Schnell's (2016) 5-item Meaningfulness Scale (with only 4 choices because of Twitter polls' limitations)

πŸ‘‡

"I think that there is meaning in what I do."
"I have a goal in life."
Read 6 tweets
May 31, 2022
Playing with metaphors to illustrate my 4 pillars of creativity...

1. The creative scientist πŸ§ͺ

β€’ Cognition = set up your lab
β€’ Collection = gather some good samples / data
β€’ Connection = look for interesting patterns
β€’ Creation = publish new insights & get feedback!
2. The mind gardener 🌱

β€’ Cognition = pick a plot of land
β€’ Collection = plant some seeds
β€’ Connection = grow branches & trees
β€’ Creation = harvest the fruit of your hard work!
3. And this is more of an abstract one...

β€’ Cognition = choose a tool for thought
β€’ Collection = consume quality content & capture quality notes
β€’ Connection = practice networked thinking & idea sex
β€’ Creation = produce & share your original work with the world!
Read 4 tweets
May 30, 2022
I'm half-French, half-Algerian. Today was the first time I saw paintings of Algerian landscapes in a museum πŸ₯Ίβ™₯️ Image
Related: if you find yourself at the Louvre in Paris, they just finished restoring "Women of Algiers", a beautiful Delacroix painting which was praised by van Gogh, Gauguin, Baudelaire & countless artists for its melancholia, calm & colors Image
Picasso loved "Women of Algiers" so much he re-created 15 versions of the painting in his own style!

(as you can see, his versions are a bit more evocative than the original Delacroix) ImageImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
Mar 8, 2022
Happy #IWD2022! Let's play a game... Can you spot what's wrong with this list of "intellectual giants" by @farnamstreet? πŸ‘€

Men don't hold a monopoly over impacting the world with their brilliant thinking. Here are 10 women that changed the world & their thinking strategies πŸ‘‡ Image
01. Let's start with the obvious... Marie Curie, the first person to win two Nobel Prizes!

It’s an understatement to say that she profoundly impacted the world with her ideas, and there is a lot to learn from her approach to problem-solving 🧠

nesslabs.com/marie-curie
02. Next is Ada Lovelace, who was wildly imaginative, but also valued her relationships in the scientific community and frequently connected science and literature.

She inspired Alan Turing’s work on the first modern computers in the 1940s πŸ–₯️✨

nesslabs.com/ada-lovelace
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(