1. NEW: My former career @StateDept, NSC, and EU colleagues are so concerned with the concessions being made by @robmalley in Vienna that they’ve allowed me to publish some details of the coming deal in the hopes that Congress will act to stop the capitulation.
[Long thread]
2. “What’s happening in Vienna is a total disaster” one warned. The entire negotiations have been filtered and “essentially run” by Russian diplomat Mikhail Ulyanov.
The concessions and other misguided policies have led three members of the U.S. negotiating team to leave.
3. This is a long and technical thread, but here’s what you should know: the deal being negotiated in Vienna is dangerous to our national security, it is illegal, it is illegitimate, and it in no way serves U.S. interests in either the short or long term.
4. Here’s why: Led by Rob Malley, the U.S. has promised to lift sanctions on some of the regime’s worst terrorists and torturers, leading officials in the regime’s WMD infrastructure, and is currently trying to lift sanctions on the IRGC itself. Let’s dive in.
5. First, Biden’s team is preparing to rescind the Supreme Leaders’ Office Executive Order (E.O. 13876) as soon as this coming Monday, and lift sanctions on nearly every one of the 112 people/entities sanctioned under it, even if they’re sanctioned under other legal authorities.
6. We sanctioned some of the worst people you can possibly imagine under this authority, like Mohsen Rezaei, who was involved in the 1994 AMIA bombing that killed 85 people in Argentina.
He’ll be able to live free of sanctions next week if Malley proceeds.
7.Also under this action, the U.S. will lift sanctions on IRGC Brigadier General Hossein Dehghan, who led IRGC forces in Lebanon and Syria when Hezbollah bombed the Marine compound in Beirut and killed 241 U.S. servicemembers in 1983.
8. Who else? Ali Akbar Velayati, a senior advisor to Supreme Leader Khamenei, who was charged in Argentina for homicide for the 1994 AMIA bombing and as one of the "ideological masterminds" behind the attack.
He also helped prop up Assad’s brutality in Syria.
9. This would also lift sanctions on Khamenei’s personal slush funds known as “bonyads”, including Astan Quds Razavi and Execution of Imam Khomeini’s Order, which confiscated houses and billions from political dissidents and religious minorities to enrich Khamenei and his goons.
10.Sanctions also to be lifted on Bonyad Mostazafan, a massive conglomerate that systematically confiscated property from Jews and Bahai’s after 1979.
It is enmeshed with the IRGC and is a corruption network used to enrich top Iranian terrorists. reuters.com/investigates/i…
Treasury and @StateDept claim these sanctions are in response to Iran's October 1 attack on Israel.
That's not true. They were issued TODAY because Congress forced these sanctions through the SHIP Act on the Biden admin back in April out of frustration.
TODAY was the deadline.
Even so, they didn't obey the law. They refused to acknowledge the law is legitimate, instead saying the sanctions were "in the spirit" of the SHIP Act.
That's Treasury-speak for "we don't care what sanctions laws Congress passes".
1. First, it is DIFFICULT to *accidentally* put classified information on a personal email account.
Classified documents have prominent labels and can only be handled in classified systems.
All employees take regular classes on how to properly handle classified info.
2. All government employees know full well (as if Hillary’s emails didn’t remind every Democratic official) that you are not allowed to conduct government business on personal email.
It literally sank Hillary Clinton’s campaign - you don’t forget this if you are Rob Malley.
THREAD: The IG report into how the @StateDept handled Iran Envoy Rob Malley's clearance suspension is mindboggling. HIGHLIGHTS:
1- No senior department leader set the parameters of what Malley was allowed to do post-suspension, but everyone claimed it was someone else's job. 🧵
2- Then, all the senior Department leaders aware of the suspension say that they thought someone else had already done so. No one did.
"Malley had little oversight prior to the suspension of his clearance, the degree of supervision actually decreased following the suspension."
3- Meanwhile, other senior department officials like Victoria Nuland (the #3) had no idea he was suspended so they emailed him sensitive things for @SecBlinken.
Malley was also regularly consulted on media and Congressional testimony questions while having no clearance.
THREAD: Once again, the Biden-Harris Admin is breaking U.S. sanctions law to give Iran a pass from sanctions enforcement.
This week, they've blown by at least THREE mandated requirements Congress passed (by massive bipartisan margins) in response to their appeasement policy.🧵
There has been a strong policy consensus in Congress for well over a year now that the attempt to return to the JCPOA failed.
Congress agreed that more pressure was needed on (at least) 4 fronts: human rights, oil exports, drone exports, and the nuclear file.
In December 2022, Congress included a provision from Senator @LindseyGrahamSC mandating reports from the Director of National Intelligence on the progress of Iran's nuclear program.
As I wrote last month, they've completely ignored this directive.
#BREAKING: Top Republicans wrote to Blinken about suspended Iran Envoy Rob Malley:
“We understand Mr. Malley’s clearance was suspended because he allegedly transferred classified documents to his personal email/cell phone” which were then stolen by a hostile cyber actor.
As @SenatorRisch and @RepMcCaul note, it’s disturbing that over a year after the top official for Iran was suspended, Congress still has to resort to backchannels to learn about this breach.
@SenatorRisch @RepMcCaul @joshrogin The Iranian regime has consistently known more about Malley’s suspension than Congress.
Last August their state media published the memo detailing Malley’s suspended clearance, which noted abuse of informational technology, which accords with this new letter.
1 - There’s a memo floating around some Hill offices with serious claims about weapons going to Ukraine – the thesis being that if the US keep giving them weapons, WE will quickly run out ourselves.
Putting my Hill staffer hat back on, a brief THREAD examining the claims. 🧵
2 – The chief concern raised is that Ukraine’s consumption of PAC-3 missile interceptors and 155mm artillery shells far outpaces US production rates.
The memo argues that we then curtail U.S. support & suggests we broker a deal to preserve our weapons for the Indo-Pacific.
Few other important claims:
1. Key stockpiles are depleted & require 3-5 years to replenish if we stopped sending weapons to Ukraine.
2. Supplying Ukraine won’t leave us enough weapons for the Indo-Pacific.
3. DoD said it was risky to draw down weapons without replacing them.