Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Lionel Page Profile picture
@page_eco
Mar 2, 2022 • 13 tweets • 5 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
Will Putin fall?
At the moment, Metaculus, a website aggregating individual forecasts, gives a 20% chance of this happening by Feb 2023.

So: popular uprising, coup or hardening of the regime? A few quick considerations. 🧵
First it is important to understand the nature of the Russian regime. Seemingly on the path to democratisation after 1989, Russia has progressively become more & more authoritarian while retaining some democratic features (e.g. access to internet) which limit the regime’s power.
The growing authoritarianism seems however to have transformed Russia in a very personal dictatorship centred around Putin. So what could happen?
slate.com/news-and-polit…
Popular uprising?
The West is hoping for massive demonstrations to take place in Russia. “Why are they not demonstrating in mass they could overrun the police forces” one can wonder. The key problem of popular uprising is to solve a coordination problem.
press.princeton.edu/books/paperbac…
Demonstrations appear when people get confident that others are going to participate. A very emotionally charged event like the unnecessary invasion of a culturally close country, an acute economic crisis, and the loss of lives could tilt the scales to larger demonstrations.
The success of such a scenario in Russia is uncertain. There are certainly strong democratic aspirations, but the bulk of the population is maintained in a fog by the main media. Social media can make a difference, but will it be enough to trigger large protests?
The key is to reach the tipping point where the regime forces start doubting. If limited, protests could instead lead to a tightening of the police state. The most unpredictable & dangerous situation would be sizeable but not large enough protests (100k).
journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.23…
Coup?
Russia has grown into a single man dictatorship. But any non-democratic regime relies on a coalition. If the oligarchs decided to drop Putin, they could. The evidence suggests it is a one man adventure. Why don’t they drop him?
First they have to solve the same coordination problem as the demonstrators. If you all agree to remove Putin, fine. But it is risky. The extraordinary actions from Putin—and the fact that he isolates himself—may help them up the chatter to the point they can coordinate.👇
In this one man regime, everything relies on Putin’s presence. If they get rid of him, the system could collapse taking them too in its fall. The Russian oligarchs are in the same plane as Putin and he may be the only one who can pilot it.
Hardening of the regime?
It is a real possibility, like in Belarus. The coalition around Putin, may prefer to go all-in instead of risking regime change. There would be a progressive elimination of the remaining democratic aspects in society, like free access to internet.
So what are the chances of Putin falling? Given the different challenges to regime change, I think around 20% is a fair guess. It is possible, but not the most likely.

One thing for sure, Putin has taken a huge risk for his regime and the future is very uncertain.
You may wonder what this 20% mean since Putin will either fall or he will not. So I’ll leave with this astute observation from Bertrand Russell.
End/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Lionel Page

Lionel Page Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @page_eco

Lionel Page Profile picture
Oct 16
Discussions on the award of the Nobel Prize in economics to Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson have often focused on their empirical papers on economic growth.
A🧵 to point to the big picture: how they transformed the discipline. Image
It is easy, particularly for younger generations, to underestimate how transformational the AJR research program has been. Step back 25 years, and the economic discipline was still very traditional in how it viewed the economy. Image
The mechanisms economists could investigate to study growth were primarily the accumulation of factors of production: labour, capital, human capital, plus some not well-understood factors like technological efficiency. Image
Read 13 tweets
Lionel Page Profile picture
Sep 12
What is depression, and why does it exist?
In spite of its prevalence, depression and the factors causing it are still not well understood. A 🧵on how an adaptive approach to cognition can help us gain a better understanding of depression.
optimallyirrational.com/p/depression
Image
Happy and unhappy feelings can be seen as meant to help us make good decisions.👇
However, depression is characterised by a lack of motivation to engage with the outside world and a reluctance to take action. How can this be helpful in making decisions?
optimallyirrational.com/p/the-truth-ab…
Image
To understand depression, we need to understand moods. Moods are lasting positive or negative feelings. What's the point of having moods?
@RandyNesse made the point that moods can be understood as signals for the value of the situations we are in. Image
Read 8 tweets
Lionel Page Profile picture
Jun 27
Kahneman said: “The concept of loss aversion is certainly the most significant contribution of psychology to behavioral economics.”
In a new paper @kubitzg1 and I propose an explanation for it, as a feature of our cognition that helps us make good decisions. Image
Loss aversion is the fact that, subjectively, losing feels worse than winning feels good. The idea has been expressed throughout human history. It can be found, for instance, in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments: Image
Loss aversion is one of the three pillars of Kahneman and Tversky's Prospect Theory which posits that subjective satisfaction is relative to a reference point. Outcomes above our reference point feel like gains and outcomes below feel like losses. Image
Read 26 tweets
Lionel Page Profile picture
May 2
Because talking to each other seems easy to us, we typically underappreciate the amazing cognitive feats we achieve in our everyday conversations. A 🧵 Image
While computers are extremely good at tasks humans find hard, like making complex calculations, they have struggled with tasks that humans find almost trivially easy, like language. It is part of the "Moravec paradox". Image
Our everyday communications may seem simple, but underneath, they are shaped by deep principles of cooperation that determine what we say and how we say it.
Read 20 tweets
Lionel Page Profile picture
Dec 9, 2023
We frequently lament the lack of quality information in the media. Yet, as consumers, we often seek not what's most accurate, but what aligns with our views. This shifts the information marketplace into a "marketplace of rationalisations". A🧵 Image
Concerns about the media aren't new. In the 20th century, intellectuals voiced worries about corporate mass media indoctrinating and dumbing down the public in ways that favoured the status quo of the political and economic order. Image
With the advent of the internet, there was hope for a decentralised public sphere, rich in idea exchange. But reality diverged from this ideal marketplace of ideas. Instead, concerns have risen about people increasingly being influenced by unreliable information. Image
Read 20 tweets
Lionel Page Profile picture
Nov 26, 2023
Why hasn't the Internet worked as a great public space where the best ideas win? Perhaps because it isn't how debates operate. Behind intellectual arguments, people aren't impartial thinkers; they advocate for their team.
A🧵on how coalitional thinking shapes our discussions. Image
Introductory example. When a Hayek citation criticising men's overconfidence was shared on a libertarian website, it was very poorly received. Ironically, the quote was from Hayek, the free-market economist. Who "said" it greatly influenced how the quote was perceived. Image
John Tooby--who recently passed away--and his wife Leda Cosmides, founded an influential school of evolutionary psychology. In a 2010 article, they highlighted the importance of our "coalitional psychology," that guides us in navigating ingroup cooperation & outgroup competition. Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(