No journalist has fully *understood* the guidance on UK visas for Ukrainians fleeing the war.
It differs from public statements by Priti Patel and other Tory MPs in many ways, all bad.
People are writing based on what Tories say, not what the rules say. gov.uk/guidance/suppo…
One example, of many possible...
Priti Patel said "there are no salary or language tests".
The guidance says "There may be cases where some people do not meet the eligibility criteria, for example the English language requirement or minimum income requirement."
Another example...
Prit Patel says: "They [Ukrainians permanently settled in the UK] and British Nationals can also bring their Ukrainian family here to seek sanctuary."
The guidance talks only of being the family of a British National.
There's much much more. All it would take is to start with the guidance and rip it apart like disassembling a jigsaw.
Then compare each relevant piece to what Priti Patel and the HO put out as statements, what she said in the House, and what she and the HO said on social media.
It's a big story - if you want it to be.
But you have to want it to be.
SUMMARY
In practical terms, the rules remain as they were on 24 Feb, though with a promise of a change on Friday (it's actually in the guidance, so maybe it will come).
Priti Patel has talked about improvements 3 times (27 & 28 Feb, and yesterday) - press lapped it up each time.
Operating principle seems to be that the round peg of fleeing refugees must somehow fit through the square hole of the Hostile Environment that is the UK immigration system.
So instead of tearing up the rules, Priti Patel and her team are trying to file off the peg's corners.
(Yes, I know I got my pegs and holes mixed up. Please don't @ me. Thank you.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The war in Ukraine is a sad and shocking catalyst that is transforming the EU. It is almost unrecognisable from the institution so many derided for its hidebound decision-making processes. Will that stick? Some of it inevitably will.
There is likely to be further EU integration, in sentiment and practice. The more its members work together, the stronger they are collectively.
At the same time, euroscepticism within the EU is likely to be weakened and remain affected. Not gone, but reappraised.
Will Ukraine be admitted as a member? That will depend on the war being won first. Beyond that, it's easy to see their candidacy getting strong support, harder to imagine the process can be speeded up to less than 5 years minimum (that feels optimistic, rather than realistic).
There is no other conclusion possible after reading these 2 documents explaining how UK visa concessions for Ukrainians should be applied by Immigration staff.
(This is the guidance for them, not the public.)
Please keep reading...
Document 1: "Concession to the Immigration Rules for Ukrainian nationals on family routes"
This is what the start of the complex process currently looks like for desperate Ukrainians trying to get UK visas to escape the war... pos.tlscontact.com/kbp_en/home
See the small print? Fill in a visa application form. Get a GWF reference, whatever the **** that is. And make your way through a warzone to submit your biometrics and support documentation.
Then wait, and pray.
There's a real sickness in the Tory ranks. How can this be ok?
Plus guess what... that's a UK phone number. So presumably those are also UK opening times.
The UK visa process is as much of a Hostile Environment as the terrain they have to cross to initiate the process.
One of the most frightening things about the invasion of Ukraine is the number of influential people who don't acknowledge that global nuclear war is an extinction event.
A few leaders and their elite entourage might survive in bunkers. But for everyone else, it's THE END.
The corollary must then be that ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING must be done to avoid that scenario.
Nato forces shooting down Russian planes and engaging Russian troops would precipitate it.
It shouldn't even be up for discussion because the downside ends the human race.
Two very small nuclear weapons (by modern standards) have been used in war, and they caused casualties so horrific it's impossible to adequately describe. I have been to the Hiroshima Memorial and the Nagasaki Peace Park. I have never wept more.
The Tories have been playing the media (and by extension the British people for fools).
There have been no new visa concessions made to Ukrainians trying to flee the war since 24 Feb, despite announcements on 27 Feb and yesterday that things had changed.
Here's the situation...
The above is my visual summary of the current (27 Feb update) government guidance, which you can see for yourself at the link below: gov.uk/guidance/suppo…
24 Feb version of the guidance (via Internet Archive) has the identical small list of exemptions. web.archive.org/web/2022022418…
Journalists took the Tories at their word and published stories about the situation improving, without ever going back to the official guidance to see that nothing had in fact changed. You will find a lot of reports in the last 3 days about how the UK was doing more for refugees.
There's been huge interest in the UK visa concessions for Ukrainian citizens fleeing the war.
Here's a graphical summary I made of just how meagre the UK response has been to date.
You can find the full current (27 Feb) guidance at the link below. gov.uk/guidance/suppo…
IMPORTANT: This isn't an official document. It's my *interpretation* of an official document. I have tried hard to keep it correct. But corrections are welcome.
For reference, the EU equivalent would be a table full of "Yes". They're offering 3 years of sanctuary to all-comers.
I have also prepared a PDF version, which may be easier to read. It's available to download at the link below.
FINAL NOTE: This is based on the most recent visa concessions from the Home Office. Things change. I can't guarantee future accuracy. drive.google.com/file/d/1pcguft…