Ukraine-Russia crisis: What is the Minsk agreement? | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera aje.io/ac8cdb “French President Emmanuel Macron has pointed to the 2015 Minsk Agreement between Kyiv and Moscow as the blueprint for a breakthrough in the Ukraine crisis.
2/“In general, Moscow and Kyiv interpret the pact very differently, leading to what has been dubbed by some observers as the “Minsk conundrum”.
What is the ‘Minsk conundrum’?
Ukraine sees the 2015 agreement as an instrument to re-establish control over the rebel territories.
3/“It wants a ceasefire, control of the Russia-Ukraine border, elections in the Donbas, and a limited devolution of power to the separatists – in that order.
Russia views the deal as obliging Ukraine to grant rebel authorities in Donbas comprehensive autonomy and
4/“representation in the central government, effectively giving Moscow the power to veto Kyiv’s foreign policy choices.
Only then would Russia return the Russia-Ukraine border to Kyiv’s control.
Why is the agreement in focus now, and how might it help resolve the crisis?
5/“Why is the agreement in focus now, and how might it help resolve the crisis?
The Minsk II deal offers a vehicle for direct talks between Ukraine and Russia and, due to France’s mediating role in the agreement, provides Macron with the opportunity to play the peacemaker on the
6/“world stage as he gears up for re-election at home.
Moscow may see Minsk II as a way to guarantee its central security demand – that Ukraine is never allowed to join NATO. Washington and NATO have already rejected that demand.
For ex-Soviet state Ukraine, the deal could
7/“present an opportunity to wrest back control of its border with Russia and end the threat of Moscow ordering another invasion, at least for now.”
[This is from 9 Feb 2022]
8/If Zelensky adamantly refuses to resolve the “Minsk conundrum” the Russian bear has Ukraine in its teeth. Z should hedge against a defeat & destruction by implementing the Minsk Agreements. An “all or nothing” attitude could result in nothing.
9/It should be noted that there are parallels to the Jeju Uprising in the prelude to the Korean War. The pro-Russian separatists are facing the forces of Ukrainian nationalism somewhat similarly to how the Koreans in Jeju resisted aligning w/ Syngman Rhee’s government.
“The Kremlin said on Saturday that the West was behaving like a bandit by cutting economic relations over the conflict in Ukraine but that Russia was far too big to be isolated as the world was much larger than just the United States and Europe.” reuters.com/world/europe/k…
Putin’s right about one thing - that “the world was much larger than just the United States and Europe”. The West’s actions have pushed Russia into China’s embrace - politically, economically & militarily. One of the most a##-backwards positions I’ve ever heard of is the US
actually OPPOSING China’s Belt & Road Initiative. A 21st century Silk Road transportation super-freeway is EXACTLY WHAT THE PLANET NEEDS!! W/ Russia’s help China will link the BRI to European countries. Russian & Chinese cultures might integrate as we approach mid-century.
Wang Yi holds phone conversation with Blinken. “Stressing that China supports Russia and Ukraine to solve the issue through negotiation, Wang said that China's position on the Ukraine issue is based on the merits of the matter concerned.” news.cgtn.com/news/2022-03-0…
2/“The resolution on the Ukraine crisis should be in accordance with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, Wang said.
He said all countries' sovereignty and territorial integrity should be respected and China welcomes negotiations between Russia and Ukraine to resolve
3/“ the crisis.”
“Taiwan region is an inseparable part of the Chinese territory, and the U.S. should stop interfering in China's internal affairs and take concrete actions to safeguard the overall interests of China-U.S. relations… At present, advancing and implementing the
“Prior to 1991, Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union and had Soviet nuclear weapons in its territory.”
Nuclear weapons and Ukraine en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_w…
2/"On December 1, 1991, Ukraine, the second most powerful republic in the Soviet Union (USSR), voted overwhelmingly for independence, which ended any realistic chance of the Soviet Union staying together even on a limited scale. More than 90% of the electorate expressed their
3/"support for Ukraine's declaration of independence, and they elected the chairman of the parliament, Leonid Kravchuk as the first president of the country. At the meetings in Brest, Belarus on December 8, and in Alma Ata on December 21, the leaders of Belarus, Russia, and
Zelensky would have WW3 happen to save Ukraine. This conflict is b/t Ukraine & Russia. Zelensky aspired to have Ukraine join NATO and now wants a No Fly Zone where NATO forces must shoot down Russian fighter jets flying overhead, which could trigger nuclear war. Plus he does not
actually know what Putin’s end game is. Saying “Europe will fall if Ukraine falls” is dangerous. Putin, using his words, is conducting a “special military operation”. An “educated guess” is he wants a Ukraine divided along the Dnieper River & a coastal land strip connecting
Donbas to Crimea. West Ukraine remains a democracy under Zelensky, East Ukraine elects a pro-Russian President & Odessa stays in WU. Europe doesn’t “fall” in this scenario. That’s what this “special military operation” is. Nothing more. Nothing less. Imo. That’s the most rational
NATO rejects Ukraine's demand for no-fly zones
“Allies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) said on Friday that they will increase support but will not grant Ukraine's request for the implementation of no-fly zones. "We are not part of this twitter.com/i/events/14832…
2/“conflict, and we have a responsibility to ensure it does not escalate and spread beyond Ukraine," NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg told a news conference.”
It’s a heavy responsibility but Jens Stoltenberg is right. The conflict is a direct result of the Minsk Conundrum
3/left unresolved, Ukrainian nationalism fighting pro-Russian separatists in Donbas & Russia’s repeated requests for the US & NATO to fully address its national security concerns going unanswered or crassly ignored. It is at the core a Russian-Ukraine conflict.
Acquiring a strip of Black Sea coastland connecting the Donbas region to Crimea up to Odessa will increases the Russian Federations security 10-fold. By forcing the issue so that Ukraine will never join NATO a WW3 scenario is averted in any Russia-Ukraine conflict. The West
ignored Vladimir Putin, dismissed his concerns. There's a lesson to be learned here: NEVER IGNORE THE SECURITY CONCERNS OF YOUR ADVERSARY. ESPECIALLY A NUCLEAR ADVERSARY. The whole point of diplomacy is to avoid scenarios such as Russia invading Ukraine
- to borrow a Boltonian phrase - "in the name of self defense". In the same manner in which Bolton used the Carolina to argue his "legal case for striking North Korea first" you can argue that Putin has invaded Ukraine "in the name of self defense". And it's a valid argument.