I tell my law school students every time I teach that I couldn't have gotten into @Harvard_Law or wherever I am teaching. They all think I am joking. I am not. The LSAT is one reason. That @TuckerCarlson is making an issue of KBJ's LSAT scores is racist, yes. But there's also
a different issue here. It's the role we allow that test to play in the legal profession. It has a huge impact. @Gladwell did an excellent series on this a while back on his podcast. People should listen to it.
I'm not complaining. The impact on my life of not going to graduate school of any kind was entirely positive. And by the way, fear of standardized tests was only one component of the reason I never considered grad school. (Hating school was a bigger component.)
But it's not a positive for everyone. And we should think about why we make such a fetish of these exams.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Okay, @EvansRyan202, that's a serious issue. Let me try to be as clear as possible: (1) I believe Putin needs to go, (2) I believe a lot of brave Russians are working on that at great risk to themselves, (3) I believe the world has put in place an infrastructure of ....
pressure on Putin organized around the Ukrainian conflict, (4) I believe the threat from Russia will not subside while Putin remains in power, and therefore (5) I believe in supporting Russian popular desire for change while leveraging elements of that pressure.
For example, lessening long-term European energy dependency on Russia, engaging in massive international anti-corruption and money-laundering efforts, refusing to normalize trade relations with Russia, and having NATO countries continue to operate at a level of readiness that...
For the benefit of anyone who is actually confused, rather than shilling for Putin, I do not believe in US military involvement in the conflict in Ukraine and have never advocated anything of the kind—much less for the US engaging in forcible regime change in Russia.
The tweet in question came in the context of a long series of tweets I have been assembling over the past several days of Russian and Belorussian protests opposing the war and demanding change.
It came in the context of a series of actions by Western governments—which I support wholeheartedly—to isolate Russia in non-military fashions and support the international order.
The US intelligence community should get a Pulitzer this year for its predictive work on Russian intentions and actions.
We rightly bash them when they get things wrong. But wow, have they performed well in this period! They’ve gotten every major aspect of Russian behavior correct a few weeks in advance, allowing policymakers to think through responses and act quickly when things happen.
Their accuracy has also allowed President Biden wholly to deprive Putin of the element of surprise or trickery.
I will leave to others to describe the differences between Canadian and U.S. federalism. @maldrevincho has interesting thoughts on the subject. I put this out for those who want to help with pointers on the subject. I will just say this. Canadian and U.S. federalism are VERY...
different. It is customary to treat Canadian provinces as much stronger sovereign entities than U.S. states. This is certainly partly true. No U.S. state, after all, could do what Quebec does on language, for example. But in some respects, Canadian provinces are weaker.
For example, in Canada, criminal law is a federal responsibility, whereas in the U.S., the vast majority of criminal law is run by the states. This is an immense power that the provinces do not have relative to U.S. states. The key point here is that generalizations are gonna...