First, it turns out that (even though sometimes they're shocked to be asked to do it!) the opportunity to be creative and think through ethical issues is really well received by students, even in otherwise technical classes. And what they come up with is amazing!
Though sometimes it was more challenging for instructors to implement the exercise without a lot of scaffolding for the ethical content, and also of course not all students have the same cultural context for scifi or Black Mirror. We're working on helping with these problems...
For example, @SamanthaDalal and I made this exercise for a computer vision class to highlight cybersecurity & related threats, and the exercise for students is based on future news headlines. (Feel free to adapt and use!) #sigcse2022docs.google.com/presentation/d…
But I think the most important insight in this work is a caution around speculation as an approach for thinking through ethical issues and harms: It is easier for people to imagine futures for and harms to people like them. And "like them" in a CS class is too often narrow.
As one interviewee pointed out, it's common for speculation to be about middle class white people. And it occurred to me (later than it should have) that all of the Black Mirror episodes I was using as examples were about... harms to middle class white people.
But technological harms disproportionately impact marginalized groups. We're creating more scaffolding to bring in e.g. principles of design justice, and in the meantime I've updated the slide deck to encourage instructors to raise this point with students.
This is a problem that we're digging into more in research moving forward, but in general in using speculation as a tool, it's important to avoid reinforcing stereotypes and to consider ways to encourage students/technologists to think broadly about injustice.
And! Lots of participants offered (unprompted) how helpful it was to have come across a teaching exercise that was openly shared, and could be “plug and play” or adapted to fit a particular instructor’s needs. Most heard about it from Twitter!
I've been making an effort to share teaching materials as much as I can, and it's so great to see this effort is worthwhile. I hope this example might encourage others to try this out too with the awesome things they develop for their classrooms. 🥰
If you're interested in learning more or running the Black Mirror Writers Room exercise yourself, you can find everything you need here! internetruleslab.com/black-mirror-w…
And here is @shamikalashawn and my paper “Run Wild a Little With Your Imagination”: Ethical Speculation
in Computing Education with Black Mirror. cmci.colorado.edu/~cafi5706/SIGC… If you're at #SIGCSE2022 we will both be virtually in tomorrow morning's author's corner!
Also because it's #SIGCSE2022 and I'm not there in person to talk everyone's ear off about ethics integration in computing education, if you're interested in more on this topic, here's a bunch of work/resources out of my lab! internetruleslab.com/responsible-co…
Oh also, acknowledgments!! (1) This study was supported by the Responsible Computer Science Challenge #ResponsibleCS (2) THANK YOU SO MUCH to the instructors who gave us their time and insights. (3) My work in this area moving forward is funded by an NSF CAREER & SaTC-EDU 🥰
Oh and also I think I owe some thanks to @doctorow who helped get the word out by writing about this on Boing Boing early on and also called me "a maven in the field of tech ethics education" so remind me to have him blurb the eventual book I write. :) boingboing.net/2018/11/19/bla…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Random commenter: Why does CS need an ethics focus?
Me: Because technology hurts people and maybe if doesn’t have to.
Them: Technology is just a tool.
Me: That. That is why CS people need more ethics focused training.
I swear this is 100% real.
I’m so tempted to do a video reply to this comment on TikTok because I don’t think everyone realizes that this is an actual attitude. Torn between two trending sounds: “the woman was too stunned to speak” or “this is a joke right?”
Oh wow I wasn't expecting that original tweet to take off. If you're interested in hearing me talk at length about the role of ethics in computer science education:
This tumblr post about a middle school science class points to a huge worry I have about research integrity & incentives. TL;DR An entire class lied about results of an experiment b/c they assumed getting the "wrong" result would earn a failing grade. 🧵 luulapants.tumblr.com/post/663893051…
The crux of it is that incentive structures in academia - what can get published, what gets attention that results in citations or press - are often based on the *findings* rather than the quality of the science that gets you there.
So as not to repeat myself, here's a recent-ish thread I did on this issue, featuring the gay marriage data fabrication scandal, peer review, the replication crisis, etc.
Hi all! I was thinking of doing this same assignment for my Online Communities class next semester. If so I will provide a starter list of books to choose from (or let them pick others) - can you all give me your suggestions for books about online communities/social media?
To start here are a few I think would be great but there are SO MANY more:
Participatory Culture, Community and Play: Learning from Reddit by @hegemonyrules
My Tiny Life by @juliandibbell
Distributed Blackness by @DocDre
This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things by @wphillips49
Also when I was in grad school I was trying to post photos on Flickr that people could use to illustrate blog posts and such, so here's a very small stack of books I had back then. Some of these I read in @asbruckman's class for my MS degree in 2005. :) flickr.com/photos/cfiesle…
This thread describes a research study that utilized deception and may have resulted in harm. I believe university IRBs are failing researchers who have been taught (incorrectly) to rely on them in good faith to flag & help navigate all possible ethical concerns in a study. 🧵
The methods described here are similar to resume and similar audit studies, and there has been debate over research ethics related to this kind of deception research for years, despite unquestionable benefit from findings that have provided evidence for discrimination.
To my knowledge, these kinds of studies have fallen under the purview of ethics review boards. For example, this paper about the ethical issues calls on ethics review to be more critical in requiring justification for deception. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
The reaction to the TikTok school threats is fascinating (and troubling) because - despite school closures all over the country and a ton of media coverage - it appears there might not have even been threats in the first place. A threat didn't go viral - fear did. 🧵
Last night when I spoke to @washingtonpost about the TikTok school threats (there's some vague thoughts from me: washingtonpost.com/technology/202…) I pointed out that I hadn't actually seen any such videos (just reactions) and couldn't even find a description of what the originals were.
The journalist I spoke to also had only seen TikToks ABOUT the threat. Teens expressing fear to go to school and encouraging others not to. Some possibilities: (1) there was a threat that did not circulate much but got a reaction that did; (2) the original was a fictional fear.
Facebook's re-branding/focus raises a question: if "connection is evolving," then how will the problems with connection via social media evolve? Coincidentally, today in my information ethics and policy class students did a speculative ethics exercise on this exact question. 🧵
Groups of students chose one of the issues raised in the facebook papers reports (algorithmic curation, misinformation, body image, content moderation, hate speech, etc.) and speculated about how that might manifest in the metaverse, and then about possible solutions/mitigation.
For example:
Disinformation. How might inaccurate perceptions of reality be even more severe in VR/AR? There have already been discussions about watermarks on deepfake video - should easy distinction between what's real versus not be a required feature?