NEW: Banning Facebook & criminalising journalism are not just the actions of a desperate man, they’re the equivalent of putting on a pair of bell-bottoms & dad-dancing across the internet.
I don’t know what’s going to happen next, no-one does. But the Kremlin’s reputation as invincible masters of information war has taken a beating. Putin’s blunt force command-&-control response v Zelensky’s social media mastery is like watching Stalin versus the TiKTok kids
And the Ukrainian war isn’t just playing out across social media. That same social media is impacting the progress of Ukrainian ground operations in real time. The open source #OSINT community is acting as a global battalion of armchair intelligence officers
It’s absolutely fascinating to watch this play out in real time. Because every photograph you see, every video clip, is being verified & geolocate & fed into open source maps & databases.
This is a country of 44 million people capturing every twitch the Russian invaders make.
Even more remarkably, according to @EliotHiggins who pioneered so many of these techniques with @bellingcat, it’s first time a co-ordinated community has been able to do this from the start in real time.
And it’s one of reasons why Russia’s disinfo has been so piss poor
It happened in Syria, @EliotHiggins says, but there was a time lag. In Ukraine, there isn’t. And the radical decision by US intelligence to put their intel into public domain helped inoculate us. They said there would be fake news about fake bombs & then, guess what?
If any Silicon Valley company uses Putin’s actions to justify themselves, I will lose it - they are responsible for so much of this shitshow - but @bellingcat & #OSINTUkraine have recaptured some of early promise of the open internet.
This is a citizen army using citizen tools.
We are complicit in so much of this. We laundered Putin’s money, we failed to reign in big tech. Which is why we MUST call out this fundamental untruth: Russia didn’t launch a war on Ukraine last week. It invaded it in 2014 in a joint assault against both Ukraine & the West
In 2014, we had no clue that Russia had also attacked us. But now we do. From 2016, the FBI & battalion of journalists & academics have laid it out piece by piece. This was a military assault on what Russia sees as a theatre of war: the internet.
We have to start taking this in.
Putin’s crude thuggery, his desperation to turn off information firehose has exposed who he really is. A weakling propped up by our own greed & stupidity, aided & abetted by his quislings Western allies, the entire battalion of chocolate soldiers of the ‘war on woke’
If headline suggested this was a tech-will-save-us & Zelensky is TikTok’s new Daddy Cool type of piece, it’s very much not.
I think our blindness & stupidity has led us to a very dark place & the Kremlin’s information fuck ups make it even more dangerous theguardian.com/world/2022/mar…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: I’ve found an opaque financial vehicle owns a large chunk of the Observer. And neither it or the Guardian will say who it is. Why?
Well there is a clue. Which goes by way of Saudi Arabia… 1/
The capture of US media orgs is accelerating. And the UK is next in line. The BBC has fallen to an AI hype guy. And my old newspaper, the Observer, is publishing Palantir puff pieces.
Distracted by the slaughter of children in Iran & Lebanon? Me too! But what better time could there be for govt to quietly relaunch its Digital ID plan?
Missed it? Me too! But look who’s celebrating…
The director of ‘govt innovation’ at the Tony Blair Institute! 1/
The govt noisily scrapped Digital ID after huge pushback when nobody bought its ‘it’ll solve immigration’ bollocks. But as markets tanked last week - kudos to the comms team! - it was discreetly re-launched with all-new messaging: a ‘common sense solution to everyday probs’
2/
Darren Jones, Cabinet Office secretary, put out a press release claiming the govt will be holding a ‘consultation’.
NOT: ‘Do you want the govt & unknown tech companies to have all your data?’
BUT: (I kid you not): ‘At what age should you be able to get a digital id?’ 🤔 3/
Congrats to all the news orgs that signed syndication deals with this company. You’ve licensed your journalism to be a core component of Trump’s illegal war machine. Great job everyone 👏
A special shoutout to the editor-in-chief & CEO of the Guardian, Kath Viner & Anna Bateson. The deal with OpenAI was an unforced error which legitimised OpenAI’s illegal scraping of Guardian data & IP. In exchange for a quick buck. The NYTimes, in contrast, chose to sue.
Anthropic stood up to Trump. But OpenAI has capitulated. And now all its ‘partners’ are complicit in the consequences.
That includes Guardian. It will financially benefit from its journalists’ work - inc mine - being used to support Trump’s illegal wars & ICE’s reign of terror.
PREDICTION: If Andrew is charged (no assumption of guilt etc), we are going to have a crisis of both the press & judiciary.
In Britain, it is an offence to publish ANY info on defendant beyond bare facts.
But! US outlets can print whatever they like…
1/
Contempt of court is foundational principle of British justice: press must not prejudice a jury trial.
Editors risk a prison sentence if found in breach.
Even in digital age, the law held…but how could it possibly withstand deluge of US coverage in a case like this??
3/
Short answer: it won’t. Far right agitator Tommy Robinson weaponised UK laws on contempt as a ‘cover up’ over grooming scandal. And the New Yorker ignored & published on Lucy Letby.
If Andrew is charged, it’ll trigger a crisis for both the press & judiciary
4/
NEW: Our investigation for @thenerve_news reveals not only that Peter Thiel’s Palantir is completely enmeshed in our critical national infrastructure.
It’s also the ‘cloud support’ for our nuclear weapons system 1/
Palantir’s stated mission is to defend America. Peter Thiel is a radical libertarian who does not believe ‘freedom & democracy are compatible’.
Yet, the UK is overwhelmingly dependent on Palantir’s services. As a national security threat, this is off the charts. 2/
Please read the piece with comments from tech & national security experts.
We have no national security while we rely on highly political US Silicon Valley firms that are enmeshed in Trump’s increasing fascistic administration. 3/