1/14 My six books about #Ukraine. I am called upon to answer questions about Ukraine every day. My books, which represent a quarter century of research and thought, often do a better job than I can while speaking live or in short pieces.
2/14 I don't often mention my books on Ukraine, because I feel uneasy promoting things that cost money while people in Ukraine are suffering and dying in this horrible unjustifiable invasion. I will continue to make meaningful donations to Ukraine. If you can, I hope you will too
3/14 My book that is most immediately relevant to the Russian invasion of Ukraine is "The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America." It is a history of the 2010s that links Russia's first invasion of Ukraine (2014) to its interference in US elections (2016).
4/14 #RoadToUnfreedom deals with politics, ideology, and propaganda under Putin.
5/14 Of my books on Ukraine, the one that centers Ukraine in recent history is "Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin," a history of mass killing by both the Nazi and Soviet regimes.
6/14 Ukraine was the most dangerous place in the world between 1933 and 1945. The first chapter treats the Stalinist famine of 1933. #Bloodlands#Ukraine
7/14 "Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning" provides an interpretation of the Holocaust in which Hitler's desire to control Ukrainian land is a central element.
8/14 #BlackEarth addresses the questions I get about how the Holocaust by bullets proceeded in the occupied Soviet Union and about nationalism and collaboration.
9/14 "The Reconstruction of Nations: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569-1999" is about the emergence of Ukrainian and other modern nations from the old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
10/14 The first of my six books on Ukraine, published twenty years ago, #ReconstructionOfNations does not cover the emergence of the Ukrainian civic nation in this century.
11/14 Of my books on Ukraine, "The Red Prince: The Secret Lives of a Habsburg Archduke," is perhaps the gentlest read. Its subject is an Austrian prince who chooses Ukrainian identity, aims at one time for a Ukrainian throne, and dies under interrogation by the KGB.
12/14 Its point is nations are a matter of commitment, not fate. #RedPrince#Ukraine
13/14 My close colleagues tend to think that "Sketches from a Secret War: A Polish Artist's Mission to Liberate Soviet Ukraine" is my best book. It deals with the Polish-Soviet contest over Ukraine in the 1920s and 1930s.
14/14 Its protagonist was an artist who spent thirteen years in the underground. It contains my most thorough archival work. #SketchesSecretWar
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/5 If Trump wanted Russia to negotiate, he would make the war harder for the Kremlin, not create the conditions for Russian victory. I wish reporters would point this out. cnn.com/2024/12/12/pol…
2/5 Putin has made clear over and over that his goal is to destroy Ukraine as a nation and a state and that he has no interest in peace talks.
3/5 Trump’s proposed policy is to force Ukraine to negotiate by denying it weapons otherwise. But the Ukrainians are not the problem! The problem is Russia, the aggressor.
1/6 Dr. Helen Ouyang in @nytimes: “The country is not heading toward a single-payer system, but that doesn’t mean we have to continue leaving patients and their doctors in the dark.”
Yes, it does in fact mean that, absent some other drastic reform.
2/6 It doesn’t help to write and publish essays like this, which present doctors and patients as good people facing tragic choices in an unchangeable system. How the system works to kill Americans for profit has to be front and center.
3/6 Only the US among comparable countries enables useless middlemen to profit hugely by placing themselves between doctor and patient. We have to be reminded that we are uniquely choosing a senseless system that takes both our wealth and our lives.
1/4. Important work here: Trump is violent rather than strong, and using US troops on protesters would break America. nytimes.com/2024/08/17/us/…
2/4. Crucial point in the reporting: the most radical plans, such as the use of US troops against Americans, actually go beyond Project 2025. nytimes.com/2024/08/17/us/…
3/4. A point not raised here is the effect that orders to suppress American protesters would have on the military itself. Either it resists or it becomes a tool of fascist power.