There are a whole lot of other things I *won't* be doing today. π
I *won't* be making lists of inspirational women.
It's not a lack of inspirational women that's the problem. It's patriarachal systems of oppression which prevent those inspirational women being heard, or (worse) prevent women reaching their potential to be inspirational.
I *won't* be organising events to get women together to support one another.
It's not lack of sisterhood that's the problem. It's patriarchal systems of oppression which put huge pressure on women's enormous ability to lift one another up.
I *won't* be giving a #IWD2022 talk to help some University tick their Athena Swan boxes.
It's not a lack of box ticking that's the problem. Box-ticking does not #SmashThePatriarchy - we know this already.
I *won't* be engaged in focussed activism, to chip away at a tiny bit of the mortar in the walls of the patriarchy with my little chisel of truth. Not today.
Today, I will say that we need to #SmashThePatriarchy, not slowly abrade it away over 1000 years.
I *won't* be attending a training session to learn to be more confident, more assertive, more loud, more like a man. I won't be training other women to fit the patriarchal mold.
If anyone thought the govt's war on "cancel culture" was really about free speech & not about shoring up the platform for specific right wing views, this news should shatter their illusions: @PriyamvadaGopal has had a talk to the home office cancelled because of her views. 1/n
@PriyamvadaGopal I want to be very clear here. Prof Gopal has not had her right to freedom of speech violated. Her academic freedom has not been violated.
She was offered the privilege of speaking at the home office, & that privilege has been revoked. It's rude, but not a violation of her rights.
However, the government has recently launched a whole damn new piece of LAW to prevent the (actually very rare) occurrence of University groups cancelling speakers because of their controversial views. They're pretending that's motivated by protecting freedom of speech. 3/n
Applications to Cambridge these days come with a certain amount of contextual information. This lets admissions tutors know, for example, if applicants come from a school with particularly low GCSE grades or from which very few students have applied to Oxford or Cambridge before.
This info is used to generate what are called "flags" on applications, to highlight students for whom this contextual information should be taken into account: undergraduate.study.cam.ac.uk/applying/conteβ¦
Now here's the thing: I know it may be practially impossible to #HonourTheOffer for every Cambridge applicant who has missed their grades in the #AlevelShambles. However, I believe Cambridge can and should offer places to students whose applications included contextual flags.
An interesting analysis of the Rosalind Franklin story from @AtheneDonald, which contrasts Franklin's step-by-step, thorough analytical approach with the leaps of logic of Crick and Watson, and asks whether...
"different educational practices would have enabled the needed leap of imagination for Franklin to construct the double helical structure without deriving it through detailed analysis"?
I wonder whether this is the wrong question? My experience is that women who make leaps of imagination are laughed at or ignored, how much more must this have been true in Franklin's day? Perhaps neither Franklin nor her education were at fault, but instead the environment she...
Excited to be attending the @UniversitiesUK webinar on Turning words into actions: Eliminating racism and racial inequality in higher education #WordsIntoAction.
Powerful introduction from Baroness @ValerieAmos stressing the need for strong leadership and real cultural change to address racial inequalities. Also, the need not only to gather data but to *act* on that data, not continually demand more and more evidence.
Next up, Dr Jason Arday of @DurhamSociology stressing the need to give BAME academics agency and autonomy to change the fundamental design of our institutions and academic systems, and the need for sustained and strategic investment to bring about lasting change.
Proud to have been involved in co-authoring an article for @ResFortnight imploring @PhysicsNews to show greater leadership in improving diversity and inclusion in Physics. This was brilliantly lead by @AJPrincep. A couple of key points we raised are below...
Professional bodies - like the IoP - need to show leadership, and enforce good practice. Without such top-down approaches, improving diversity gets left to members of under-represented groups, who can least afford to sacrifice their time and energy to advocate for change.
One key area, where I believe all professional societies and engineering institutes should be doing more, is putting in place robust & effective policies to prevent sexual and gender harassment. I co-authored an article about this for the @iom3 last year: iom3.org/materials-worlβ¦
Really, really glad to see @iom3 considering changing the name of the Younger Members Committee.
If you're a materials scientist please consider the needs of early career folk with a non-standard career path and vote for a name that will include them... Who might that be? Well...