The Ghislaine Maxwell juror inquiry is scheduled to begin around 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

I'll be covering those proceedings live, @LawCrimeNews.

Catch up with background from late last month: lawandcrime.com/live-trials/gh…
Court is running behind schedule today. Standby.
Maxwell juror Scotty David enters, seated next to his attorney @toddspodek.

"All rise."

Judge Nathan enters.

AUSA Alison Moe for the government.

Bobbi Sternheim for Maxwell.
Judge Nathan:

"I also received proposed questions for both sides, which I have carefully considered in advance of today's hearing."
The juror wishes to be referred to as "Juror 50," despite the fact that he identified himself as "Scotty David" in press interviews.

Judge Nathan agrees to this request.
Q: Juror 50, is it your intention to assert your Fifth Amendment privilege in response [to questions]?

David: Yes, your honor.

Judge Nathan says she has signed the proposed immunity order here. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
As a result of that immunity agreement, David cannot be prosecuted for any truthful answers.
Juror 50 goes to the witness box and then steps down to provide his full name privately to the court reporter.

He is now under oath.
David has a binder in front of him.

Judge Nathan refers him to Court Ex. 1—his jury questionnaire. He examines the exhibit for identification and identifies it.
He is asked about question 48 and his "No" answer.
Judge Nathan asks if that is an accurate answer on his questionnaire.

A: "No, it is not,"

Q: "What is an accurate answer to that question?"

A: "Yes, for self."
If it were accurate, he said: ""I would have put, 'I was abused as a child.'"

"It was a family member who is no longer a part of the family and one of his friends when I was nine or 10 years old."
Q: Did this happen on one occasion or on multiple occasions?

A: Multiple occasions.

Q: Did you tell anyone?

A: I did not, for several years until I was in high school.

The juror says it was a stepbrother.
David:

"I flew through this questionnaire. I honestly never thought I would be chosen to sit on this jury."
David:

"At this point, I was super-distracted."

"There was a lot of talking going on [...] and so I just start going though."

"I didn't spend a lot of time thinking about it."
David said he didn't think his experiences would affect him as a juror.

Asked by Judge Nathan why he didn't think he'd have been selected, David notes the large number of candidates.

But he insists: "I did not set out in order to get on this jury."
As for filling out the forms incorrectly, David testified:

"I completely skimmed way too fast. I was distracted by all the noise going on all around me."

He adds: "I thought it was asking about family, or a friend."
David calls it an "inadvertent mistake."

"This is one of the biggest mistakes I have made in my life."
Asked whether he intentionally answered incorrectly to get on the jury, David responds: "Absolutely not."

He reiterates a variation of that question by answering: "Absolutely not, your honor."
He says he doesn't think of himself as a victim of a crime, even though he knows that he was one.

Asked whether he tailored his answer to be selected for the jury, he responds: "No, your honor. I wasn't even thinking about that."
David:

"This is a terrible excuse, but I really didn't think I would be chosen."
David:

"I don't really think about my sexual abuse, period. I don't tell many people."

Judge Nathan asks how he can reconcile that statement with his press interviews.
David:

"I didn't think this would happen. I didn't lie to get on this jury.

If I lied deliberately, I wouldn't have told a soul."
David:

"It was an honest mistake," he says, apologizing.
Pressed on the incongruity with his testimony he doesn't tell people about his abuse, and his telling the international media, David said the testimony of Maxwell's victims inspired him.

"I felt if they could be brave enough, then so can I."
Judge Nathan meets with the counsel for the opposing parties at sidebar.
Nathan returns to questions about whether he completed the questionnaire with diligence. (He previously answered "no.")

"It was definitely inadvertent," he said.

"I just wanted to get done with it."
Q: Would you say that you are distracted easily?

He says it could be, but that it didn't affect his ability to consider the evidence.
Asked why he didn't think his friends and family would learn about his abuse from press interviews, he said: "I wasn't using my full name."

He says he wasn't "ashamed" about it. It's "something that happened" and something that's "common" with people around the world.
David adds: "It wasn't something that I was trying to hide."

"If someone were to ask me if I were abused, I would say yes."
After Maxwell's victim Annie Farmer shared Scotty David's interview, David said: "I thanked her for sharing hers as well."
Asked how he felt when he learned about the mistake on his questionnaire, David said that he was "embarrassed" and "shocked."
Judge Nathan sets a date of March 15, one week from today, for a briefing from both parties arguing about the ramifications of David's testimony.
Adjourned.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

Feb 21
Closing arguments will begin shortly in the federal case against Ahmaud Arbery's convicted murderers. Unlike in the state case, prosecutors ask a jury to find that they committed their crimes "because of Arbery's race and color."

ICYMI, opening statements lawandcrime.com/live-trials/li…
The first line by Christopher Perras, from the DOJ Civil Rights Division:

"There's a big difference between being vigilant and being a vigilante."
Perras says Arbery's killers weren't passionate about trespassing: "Travis McMichael even ripped down a 'No Trespassing' sign."

"This wasn't about trespassing. It wasn't about neighborhood crime. It was about race. Racial assumptions. Racial resentment and racial anger."
Read 40 tweets
Feb 17
"Judge Refuses to Quash Subpoenas and Depositions for Donald Trump and His Children: It Would Be a 'Blatant Dereliction of Duty' Not to Investigate"

DEVELOPING story, with the 8-page ruling inside:
lawandcrime.com/high-profile/j… via @lawcrimene
This is an absolutely blistering ruling.

Some highlights once I give the story an update. In the meanwhile, give the order inside the story a read.
Earlier this morning, Trump's lawyers argued that the civil probe was essentially a way to extract information without having to offer immunity that a grand jury would afford in a criminal investigation.

Engoron: "This argument completely misses the mark."
Read 10 tweets
Feb 17
New York AG @TishJames faces off this morning against Trump's lawyers on a motion to compel the Trump family, in the first hearing since the big Mazars news.

Follow our coverage, @LawCrimeNews.
Kevin Wallace is arguing for @NewYorkStateAG.

Alina Habba and Ronald Fischetti are arguing for Donald Trump.

Hon. Engoran presides.
Alan Futerfas is up for Eric Trump.

He says the motion to compel is "really unprecedented in the research that we could find given the facts of this case," calling it a "case of first impression."

He claims it raises "strong issues" about the attorney general.
Read 41 tweets
Feb 14
First line of a prosecutor's opening statement in the federal trial against Ahmaud Arbery's killers:

"I want to talk to you all about what turned out to be the last day of Ahmaud Arbery's life."

Background, @Lawcrimenews: lawandcrime.com/live-trials/li…
AUSA on why the McMichaels and Bryan:

The short answer, you'll learn, is that all three defendants made decisions about Ahmaud because of the color of his skin.
AUSA notes that, though this is commonly described as a federal "hate crime" trial, the charge "does not require proof of hate."

"It requires that the defendant acted because of race."
Read 10 tweets
Feb 10
Good morning from New York.

Sarah Palin's testimony continues in her lawsuit against the New York Times.

I'm covering the proceedings for @LawCrimeNews.
During pre-trial arguments, the NYT's lawyer argues that someone known for saying "Don’t retreat, reload" will have a hard time arguing that she sustained emotional damage in the face of criticism about her gun rhetoric.
The NYT wants to grill Palin on rhetoric like that to establish that Palin "plays in the public field" and "uses hyperbole" to make her points.

Judge Rakoff says he'll allow it.
Read 74 tweets
Feb 9
Sarah Palin is now on the witness stand.
Questioning starts with biographical information, including her family and career.

When told many people haven't been to Wasilla, she says: "They're missing out!"

"It's a small town, about 30% of the work force commutes into Anchorage."
Q: Do you recall when you became mayor in Wasilla?

A: I always relate it to how old my kids were: '94 to 2002.

(Note: That's almost right. She actually became mayor in 1996.)

"I'll just admit it. I'm not good at dates."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(