A historical thread on how repression in Russia and a large flow of refugees from a.o Ukraine triggered the birth of immigration control in Britain.
For much of the the 19th century, Britain had no regulation to control immigration flows.This is a quote from Earl Granville, foreign secretary in 1872. Anyone had the "unrestricted right of entrance" into Britain.
Events in Eastern Europe would change this. In the Russian Empire, the Jewish population was only allowed to live in the so-called Pale of Settlement, which corresponds to much of modern-day Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania and Moldova, and east-central Poland.
The Jewish population in the Pale came to represent 5 mio people, or nearly 40% of the total Jewish population in the world.
Under the reign of Emperor Alexander II (1851-1881), the rights of some Jews were expanded, and regulations for rich and/or educated jews to live outside the pale were relaxed.
Things changed dramatically for the worse in 1881, when he was assassinated. The repressive May laws passed by his successor considerably restricted the rights of Jews in the pale (regarding settlement, property), and anti-semitic violence increased. Jews were expelled from Kiyv
This triggered a wave of emigration to the West, notably to Britain. Over the space of a generation, close to 3 million Jews from that area sought shelter abroad.
As a transit point on the way to America, Britain became a significant destination for Jews from Eastern Europe. Many immigrants stayed even if their initial aim was to continue their journey. Between 1881 and 1914, around 150’000 Jews settled in Britain.
Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe would typically settle in poor neighbourhoods (e.a the East End, Stepney). Conservative MPs from East London would come to play a prominent role in pushing the issue of immigration restriction.
In 1887, an MP asked “What great states of the world other than Great Britain permit the immigration of destitute aliens without restriction", and what prevented measures that "shall put a stop to the free importation of destitute aliens into the United Kingdom”
In 1888, a select committee of the House of Commons was appointed to “inquire into the laws existing in the United States and elsewhere on the subject of the immigration of destitute aliens, and as to the extent and effect of such immigration into the United Kingdom”.
From the 1890s, renewed repression in Russia triggers more fears of large refugee flows. MPs on the right ask for a legislative base for immigration restriction.
Jewish immigrants from eastern Europe were especially accused of pushing wages down, and putting pressure on poor relief. There was little evidence of this, however.
Nevertheless, anti-immigration groups such as the British Brothers league were able to organise 4000-strong meetings in East London. People like W. Wilkins, Arnold White or Major William Evans-Gordon talk of an "Alien Invasion".
Ultimately, this climate led to the adoption of the 1905 Aliens act, the first piece of legislation empowering the Home Secretary to control immigration flows into the United Kingdom. It would be further strengthened in 1914, 1919 and many times after.
I am writing a book on immigration policy and the welfare state for @OUPPolitics. Here's a thread on how my own existence is due to immigration policy and the welfare state.
Up to the 1960s, Switzerland had satisfied a great deal of its labour needs with immigrant workers from Italy, so that it had become quite dependent on Italian workers. In 1960, 20% of the whole workforce were migrant workers, and two thirds of these were Italian.
But permit conditions were drastic, with limits on family reunification, exclusion from welfare schemes. Given that wages and living conditions in Italy were improving rapidly, Italy used this dependency as leverage.
Based on the projection and earlier polls asking about vote transfers, this is how voter flows in the second round of the French presidential election could look like. If this holds Macron should still win with 54%.
This ignores the small candidates for whom I don't have declared preferences in the second round. It also ignores the "endorsements" for the runoff being made just now. Mélenchon just called not to give a single vote to Le Pen, even if he didn't name Macron explicitly.
We know that a number of radical right (RR) parties in Western Europe have developed substantial (ideological; financial) links with the Russian government over the years. bbc.com/news/world-eur…
But what about their voters? The Pew Research Center periodically asks respondents in 16 countries about their views on a number of global issues, and notably their trust in global leaders, including Putin. The last available wave is from 2021. pewresearch.org/global/2021/09…
I guess it had to happen: I started a substack where I'm going to post some short pieces. You can subscribe here: alexandreafonso.substack.com
The first post is about radical right voters in Western Europe and Vladimir Putin. We know that Le Pen, Salvini and the AfD are very pro-Putin. Was it the case of their voters? alexandreafonso.substack.com/p/1-radical-ri…
I use data from the Pew Global Attitudes Survey collected in 9 countries in 2021 (n=9k). The short answer is that radical right voters were on average 3x more likely than other voters to have confidence in Vladimir Putin to "do the right thing in world affairs".