The word "detente" has been deliberately scrubbed from the western lexicon. This has created a false dichotomy where everyone thinks the only choices are either escalate until we have a nuclear war or "OMG SO JUST GIVE PUTIN WHATEVER HE WANTS AND LET HIM TAKE OVER EUROPE???"
Any time you oppose freakish world-threatening escalations that's the response you always get: "SO JUST GIVE IN TO THE BULLY AND LET HIM HAVE EVERYTHING???" They're sincerely unaware that there's a third choice between World War 3 and making Putin Emperor of Planet Earth.
This is by design, because detente and US unipolar hegemony are mutually exclusive. You can't let Russia be its own nation and also dominate the entire planet; it's either one or the other. Detente was a popular concept back when we lived in a *multipolar* world, during the USSR.
Now that US unipolar hegemony is the normalized mainstream consensus ideal within the western empire, any talk of working toward peaceful solutions that don't subjugate one power to the other show up before indoctrinated minds as outrageous heresy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Johnstone ⏳

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @caitoz

Mar 10
What is the argument here? That in the English-speaking world there's not enough criticism of Putin's invasion and too much criticism of NATO aggression? That if more of us scream about Putin he'll go "Ah shit I pissed off a few fringe westerners, let's cancel the war you guys"?
I don't mean to pick on Jordan specifically, I see this argument everywhere, and it just makes no sense to me. Our voices can do far more good criticizing the actions of our own governments that receive barely any criticism than those of someone else's government which gets tons.
It can't be denied that there's a major propaganda push to manufacture consent for dangerous agendas which pre-date the invasion by many years. Is my voice better used opposing those dangerous agendas, or in helping to facilitate them by saying what everyone else is saying today?
Read 4 tweets
Mar 9
Really not feeling great about how much mainstream western punditry boils down to "What's the maximum amount we can provoke and attack Russia without starting a nuclear war? Some say the line is here, but I think it's probably further back."
I mean, like, what about Putin's recent actions suggests that this is the sort of person you want to take chances with? And not just chances, but *the most consequential chances humanly possible*?
You never quite know who's listening to who; what actual decision maker is listening to what dumbass warmongering thought leader. And just the fact that these ideas are gaining so much mainstream traction can be enough to adjust the other side's calculations in a dangerous way.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 8
I've lost count of how many times I've seen major western institutions humiliate themselves with propaganda glorifying Ukrainians who on closer examination turn out to be neo-Nazis. It's a daily occurrence now.
Does @AlanRMacLeod have a thread on this phenomenon yet? He should.
Read 15 tweets
Mar 8
The US empire has had a standing policy of preventing the rise of any rival superpowers since the USSR collapsed. Both Moscow and Beijing have refused to kiss the imperial ring and crippling Russia is an essential part of hamstringing China's rise. This was all planned years ago.
Gilbert Doctorow described back in 2017 how Moscow and Beijing have formed a mutually beneficial "tandem" based on their respective strengths; Russia as a major military force willing to confront the US empire, and China as a rising economic superpower.
consortiumnews.com/2017/10/23/rus… Image
Empire architects had previously expected that Moscow would be forced to pivot to Washington and become a member state of the empire. The fact that it chose Beijing instead to retain its sovereignty is what set all this in motion.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 8
Ohh is THAT why the US and its allies have been letting Saudi Arabia get away with genocide?
And also helping Saudi Arabia commit genocide? And also lying about it?
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/biden-lied-a…
I reckon it's not about fweedom and democwacy at all but is in fact really all about uniting the entire planet under one power structure by working to absorb all countries into the US-centralized empire and toppling any government that refuses.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 8
Australian government now implementing sanctions for the dissemination of unauthorized ideas.
foreignminister.gov.au/minister/maris…
Can't help but wonder if Australians like myself will soon be labeled "of strategic interest to Russia" for circulating unauthorized ideas about this conflict.
"The men targeted are journalists, authors or Putin's press officers."

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(