Many are sceptical of things they are told ahead of or during war, including by their own government. We are repeatedly told this is irrational & that to question things makes one a conspiracy theorist (tho of course they exist too). So here's a thread about 'Nayirah' in 1990 1/9
In October 1990, with the US public unsure about war in Iraq, a 15 year old known as 'Nayirah' testifies to the congressional human rights caucus. She had previously volunteered in a hospital in Kuwait (weird for a 15 year old but okay) . She cries during her testimony 2/9
While working in a Kuwaiti hospital, 'Nayirah' claimed to have seen Iraqi soldiers enter and remove babies from incubators - leaving 312 to die on the floor. Unthinkable evil - which sounds like something from a movie. This understandably generated a strong public response 3/9
George Bush senior repeated this claim in 10 subsequent speeches. Bush was so convincing that Amnesty International reported the story. Polls in August (Gallup) found only 17% of the American public supported immediate military intervention. By December that figure was 41%. 4/9
The following January the Senate voted 52 to 47 to authorize U.S military force in Iraq. Seven senators cited Nayirah’s testimony to justify their stance backing the use of force in Kuwait 5/9
But here's the thing. None of this ever happened. And 'Nayirah' - the volunteer nurse? She was the daughter of Saud Al-Sabah, the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. She'd been coached by consultancy Hill & Knowlton who sent video of her testimony far and wide 6/9
This was, in effect, a PR campaign in an information war for people's consent to go to war (including elected legislators). Yet this particular 'event' was entirely made up. It was the kind of propaganda you use against enemy populations 7/9
Amnesty later issued a correction, with executive director John Healey (not that one) accusing the Bush administration of "opportunistic manipulation of the international human rights movement" 8/9
It "found no reliable evidence that Iraqi forces had caused the deaths of babies by removing them or ordering their removal from incubators."
The lesson? Despite the default of contemporary politics & media being permanent hysteria, a dose of healthy scepticism is rational 9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sanctions imposed on Russia are without precedent - except for for one country: Iran.
What have they achieved since 2011? A hugely informative piece by @a_merat on how recent steps could mean the militarisation of Russian society. novaramedia.com/2022/03/07/san…
The big winner in Washington's economic war against Tehran?
Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Intense economic sanctions now run the risk of repeating events in 1941 with Imperial Japan. That said, the Allies won 80 years ago - but first economic battle became full-scale military confrontation.
Feel good millennial activism and rhetoric is half the reason nonsense like mass tree planting is entertained as a viable response to the climate crisis. It feels good, and it’s easy?! Wow, must be right!
My spirit animal on perma-optimism as political default. And I’m optimistic by nature!
Many people getting upset at this! And Ronan doesn’t help himself by insinuating climate protesters are all middle class (though that is undeniably base of green direct action).
But realistically there should be a culture of debate regarding tactics on the left >
My principal criticism is that most people on left either have been critical of insulate britain or open to idea that it’s not wholly positive. The idea that all and any kind of direct action is good and effective because the suffragettes did it is obviously illogical (& wrong) >
And Ronan is right about danger of turning issue where there’s 70% support for action into something like 50-50 culture war.
Sometimes effective politics is about polarisation (tax the rich, Brexit) where winning a maj of public opinion is fine. Climate change isn’t that >
People can think whatever they like re censorship but seeing these, after so much support from Tory MPs & conservative journalists, is illustrative.
It’s why viewing the labour right as the ‘centre’ is to fundamentally misunderstand it. I don’t quite know what they believe in.
It’s not to ‘dunk’ on any of these people, I understand it and twitter is often about triviality and a laugh, but I do honestly think a big part of the Labour right is more reactionary than actual Tories on quite a few things. Why? >
Principally it’s because, in my view, conservatives don’t claim to necessarily believe in social & economic justice so take civil & political rights somewhat seriously. The Labour right doesn’t. That’s also why it isn’t especially good on due process or anything involving rules.
“Glasgow University accused of undermining academic freedom in 'antisemitic' ruling”.
This is absolutely outrageous, not least because the article in question was rigorous and analytical. Solidarity with Jane Jackman. Academic freedom matters. scotsman.com/education/glas…
The article in question is here, decide for yourself.
The grim reality is that British universities are increasingly more concerned about media risk management than open and critical inquiry. The same applies with IHRA fundamentalism.
“this article employs some discursive strategies, including a biased selection of sources as well as the misrepresentation of data, which promote an unfounded antisemitic theory regarding the State of Israel and its activity in the United Kingdom.” Just extraordinary.
We have 2 parties fixated with defending permanent bureaucracy of state because the system blocks heterodoxy. Britain will be stuck with ineffective government until it changes its electoral system or parties have primaries (1/2)
European elections with PR somewhat broke that (allowing UKIP through), as does regionally concentrated votes under FPTP (Ireland a century ago, Scotland today). But entire set up is undemocratic, when that cracks (see Corbyn) establishment goes nuts because it’s a malfunction.
This system means problem solving & offering novel ideas is actively avoided and incentivised against both individually & collectively 🤯
The means by which body politic & society can reinvigorate itself doesn’t exist. Does Biden go left happen without primaries? Arguably no.