1) A look at the military situation in eastern and central Ukraine, & around the capital of Kiev. This will use several maps, from @nytimes & @Bcc. First the overall picture, using map from @nytimes. The strategic situation for Ukrainian force in Kiev & to the east is not good.
@nytimes@Bcc 2) There hasn't been a lot of movement by the Russians overall (compared to the first week that is), however it appears the Russians are consolidating their positions, preparing/positioning, and moving with the goal of the encirclement of several key regions.
@nytimes@Bcc 3) Russian forces are moving to cut off the far eastern areas close to the Donbas region, both northeast of Mariupol, and east of Izyum.
@nytimes@Bcc 4) While the @nytimes map doesn't show it, @nytimes reported that Polohy, NE of Mariupol, is occupied by Russian forces. However the map does show UKR battleline north of Polohy.
@nytimes@Bcc 5) There are also credible reports that the Russians are seeking to march on the city of Dnipro on the Dnieper river. @nytimes maps shows this. If the Russians can take Dnipro (this is an operation that should take weeks to unfold) then the eastern half of Ukraine would be cut.
@nytimes@Bcc 6) In the south, RUSMIL appears to be bypassing Mykolaiv & pushing north. Russian forces likely don't have the manpower/resources to lay siege to the city, & can blockade/starve it instead. RUSMIL likely pushing to the South Ukraine nuke plant & Odesa to shut off Black Sea.
@nytimes@Bcc 6) The north: Russian forces continue to push to complete an encirclement of Chernihiv province while pushing to also encircle Kiev. The city of Chernihiv remains defiant but is close to being cut off in a wide pincer movement. UKR troops caught in this pocket will be cut off.
@nytimes@Bcc 7) Kiev: Russian forces are on the outskirts of the city & are facing fierce resistance from UKR military & territorial forces. Russian forces are now positioned north, west & east of the city. Russian forces continue to position its forces for a siege & possible assault.
@nytimes@Bcc 8) Ukrainians still have an escape valve to the south. It is unclear if the Russians plan on full encirclement or will leave this valve open. Speculation: Russia wants to take the city and/or collapse gov't. Letting the UKR forces retreat is a time-honored way of achieving this.
@nytimes@Bcc 9) Back to the bigger picture: Does Russian want to take all of Ukraine, or sever it in half and leave a pliant, demilitarized rump state in the west? If the latter, then ...
Linking in this thread, all apologies for the break in continuity.
1) President Trump is correct that the US withdrawal from Afghanistan was “perhaps the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country.” The manner in which the withdrawal was conducted was shameful, and we left Afghan allies of 20 years to the predations of the Taliban.
2) However, President Trump must acknowledge that his flawed and misguided Doha Agreement set the stage for Biden’s debacle. President Trump should hold those accountable for the execution of the withdrawal, including those within the military who acquiesced to this flawed plan.
3) Additionally, I would caution President Trump to not view Pakistan as an ally for turning over the mastermind of the Abby Gate attack. Pakistan is not and never has been our friend and ally.
1) The Biden administration is amking the same mistake in Syria that it (as well as the Obama and last Trump administration) made in Afghanistan: pretending that a jihadist tiger will magically change its stripes and moderate.
2) As in Afghanistan, in its desire to support the Syrian people, the Biden administration is willing to work with Hayat Tahrir al Sham, a US-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, and its leader, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist: archive.fo/qtiHm
3) As @adesnik & I note in @WSJ, HTS leader Abu Mohammad al Jolani is no moderate, and has a long history as a terrorist leader in Syria and Iraq. Putting a suit on Jolani won't transform him into a moderate. wsj.com/opinion/syrias…
1. As the Biden administration considers removing Hayat Tahrir al Sham from the list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, the terror group openly cooperates with numerous foreign and local terror groups.
1. We've listed 10 of them at @LongWarJournal. Keep in mind that HTS leader Abu Muhammad al Jolani is a Specially Designated Global Terrorist for his long history with Al Qaeda. The history didn't end. longwarjournal.org/archives/2024/…
3. Jolani never renounced his oath to Al Qaeda, and in the statement where he purportedly broke with Al Qaeda, he never denounced Al Qaeda. Jolani said that his group would have “no affiliation to any external entity.” This is vague. And also false. To this day, HTS has "affiliations" with several "external entities".
1) August 12, 2021: Taliban seize control of the Afghan provinces of Badghis, Ghazni, Herat, Kunduz & Sar-i-Pul. The 1st province, Nimroz, fell on August 6, and was followed by Badakhshan, Farah, Jowzjan & Takhhar. By August 12, 10 of the 24 provinces were under Taliban contol.
2) General Milley and others claimed that Afghanistan fell in 11 days, and the collapse of the 1st province on August 6 is the origin of that myth. Afghanistan was collapsing, district by district, long before that. We documented it at @LongWarJournal longwarjournal.org/mapping-taliba…
3) The Taliban's final push to take over the provinces was the culmination of years of the Taliban's successful military and political strategy.
1) Yet another datapoint on how to know we know we lost the War on Terror: the government couldn’t even convict KSM, Attash & Hawsawi for 9/11. Kill 2,976 people, wage War on the USA & destroy billions in property? Life in prison. Shameful isn’t a strong enough word.
2) Well played, U.S. government, good to know you have our backs. The American public should be outraged and the administration should be flayed by the press for agreeing to this. But this will pass with barely a whimper.
3) Osama bin Laden was right: after 9/11, the world would find out who is the strong horse and who is the weak horse. The fact that we couldn’t figure out a way to execute the plotters of 9/11 answers that question.
1) The U.S. foreign policy establishment still hasn’t internalized the fact that at best, and this is extremely charitable, that Pakistan is a frenemy, and in reality, our enemy.
2) Pakistan funded and supported the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan and out ignominious death.
3) My 2016 testimony to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade and the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific on Pakistan is as true today as it was 8 years ago.