1/9
Good article, as usual, by Caixin on how regulators hope to expand credit this year. Credit must expand by at least 10% to achieve the growth target, but regulators are trying to limit the amount of credit going to property and infrastructure.
caixinglobal.com/2022-03-09/in-…
2/9
"Even as the central government seeks to stimulate the economy with more credit," Caixin notes, "it’s still seeking a balance so it doesn’t derail efforts in recent years to slash excess leverage in China’s overheated housing market and debt-ridden local governments."
3/9
As a result, "banks are focusing on issuing a greater share of their loans to small businesses, as well as agricultural, technology, green and manufacturing companies this year, as advocated by China’s central bank."
4/9
This is very similar to Japan's "window guidance" in the 1970s and 1980s. The problem of course is that the amount of credit expansion is determined not by the needs of the various borrowing sectors but rather by the need to achieve a GDP growth target.
5/9
But the actual borrowing and investment needs of small businesses and manufacturing and technology companies is determined by expected demand, and this in turn is largely determined by growth in consumption and exports.
6/9
But while Beijing is pulling out all stops to keep exports growing, as of yet it still seems unable to implement measures that will boost domestic consumption, which is far more important and which means, above all, raising wages and the household share of GDP.
7/9
The result, as ever, is supply-side support for sectors that need demand-side support. Unfortunately just because banks are forced to lend to private businesses, this doesn't mean that private businesses will use the funding productively.
8/9
From what I understand from the @ChinaBeigeBook folks, private businesses in China aren't falling over themselves in their eagerness to expand production. If that's true, what will the loans be used for?
9/9
In the end, I would argue, China will achieve the high 5.5% GDP growth target it set for itself this year, but to do so it must force credit to expand, and lending to property and infrastructure must drive the bulk of that expansion.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Mar 12
1/11
Yesterday, in his final NPC press conference, Li Keqiang explained that Beijing was choosing tax rebates to business over consumption support or even more infrastructure spending because it was a more efficient way to deliver growth.
china-embassy.org/eng/zgyw/20220…
2/11
But supply-side measures like tax rebates to businesses would only be ta more efficient way to boost the economy if businesses had major investment needs that they were unable to satisfy because of lack of retained earnings or access to capital.
3/11
They would however be very inefficient in an economy suffering from demand-side constraints.

This doesn't mean businesses wouldn't prefer tax rebates anyway. Tax rebates boost profits directly, whereas spending on infrastructure and consumption does so indirectly.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 11
1/8
According to the WSJ, "Shifting more production domestically will inevitably add to the inflation that is already on the rise." I know inflation has become the thing we most like to worry about, but I don't think this claim is true at all.
wsj.com/articles/econo…
2/8
There is no evidence that a less globalized world is more inflationary than a more globalized one. Trade restrictions on a particular good may raise the price of that good inside the protected market, but it lowers the price of that good outside the protected market.
3/8
Even inside the protected market, the price increase on that good is a one-off event, not a continuous (inflationary) one, and anyway puts downward pressure on the prices of other goods within the protected market.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 9
1/8
Interesting interview of Japan's Saito Renho, a former president of the Democratic Party of Japan. I couldn't help but read within a Chinese context her comments about Japan's failed attempts to resolve demand-side imbalances with supply-side measures.
hks.harvard.edu/centers/mrcbg/…
2/8
She starts by pointing out that "the idea of Abenomics was to improve the economy by a trickle-down effect, by enriching the 'haves' within society, the richer and the large corporations."
3/8
She continues: "The improvement for the rich would then improve labor conditions throughout society and raise the economic growth of Japan as a whole."

This is the classic supply-side approach.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 8
1/7
Chinese exports have soared recently, and its trade surplus is the highest in its history, and yet Beijing is still far more enthusiastic about further promoting and subsidizing trade than about developing its weak and lagging domestic consumption.
en.people.cn/n3/2022/0308/c…
2/7
According People's Daily, "China has released guidelines focusing on cross-cyclical adjustments to help companies secure industrial and supply chains, guarantee foreign trade orders, stabilize expectations, and further unleash the growth potential of exports and imports."
3/7
The new guidelines include "strengthening fiscal and financial policy support, encouraging development of new business formats such as cross-border e-commerce and overseas warehouses, and easing international logistics pressure on businesses."
Read 7 tweets
Mar 8
1/5
While the Russian sanctions will certainly increase the desire of some countries to have an alternative to the dollar, it wasn't insufficient desire that prevented the emergence of the RMB or some other currency in the past as a safe haven alternative.
ft.com/content/d5346d…
2/5
It was the basic conditions of global currency status. For the RMB to become an alternative to the dollar it isn't enough that once, during a period of turmoil, it retained its value. This is just the minimum necessity for a safe haven currency, and very far from sufficient.
3/5
For the RMB to be a major alternative to the dollar, not only must it remain stable during every crisis, but, more importantly, China must completely open its capital account, remove any interference on inflows and outflows, and liberalize its financial system.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 7
1/6
The decline in India's unemployment rate is clearly bad for the economy, as is the reversal of urbanization, but this isn't necessarily the case for a rise in income inequality, which tends to boost the domestic savings rate.
ft.com/content/b99a43…
2/6
In advanced economies – and some developing economies like China – where savings are too plentiful and demand weak, the main constraint on business investment is weak demand.
3/6
In that case conditions which raise ex ante savings (i.e. by lowering consumption) tend to suppress growth in productive investment, especially private-sector investment.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(