Big Tech that has announced return to the office - usually as a hybrid setup with 2/3 days/week - and when it's due:
- Microsoft: 28 March
- Meta: 28 March
- Google: 4 April
- Apple: 11 April
Who wins: policy? Exceptions for devs threatening to quit? Startups hiring remote?
🍿
For all the above companies, the plan has always been to return the office.
What has changed since is how many of their competitors became remote-first since. E.g. Twitter, Shopify. And how well-funded startups are hiring full-remote and are desperate to hire from these places.
Several DMs later:
Google, Microsoft and Facebook are all extremely chill about engineers coming back to the office. Most engineers I talked to won’t go back / have exceptions / their manager allowing remote.
Only place where it’s serious is Apple. Seems no way out there.
At Meta, today was the deadline to request a remote exception. The people I talked with all expect to get the exception. Eng managers are banket approving all of them and many assured folks that they won’t track who comes when or who doesn’t.
All eyes on what happens at Apple.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I see so much FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) about the future of sw engineering, mostly from non-devs. Along the lines of “soon anyone can spin off AI agents in bulk that act as hundreds of devs.”
A false premise. Just open your airline app that is built by ~hundreds of devs.
Good software is far more nuanced than just how many devs work on it.
Skype hired good devs and won the video calling desktop market. It got to 1,000+ devs and then… this startup with 50 devs washed the floor with them for mobile chat + calls. It was called WhatsApp.
To understand how software engineering will change when anyone (technical or not) can hire an AI agent to spit out code:
How did filmmaking change now that everyone has a professional-camera (previously unattainable to non-pros) in their pocket?
A lot more startups (esp AI startups) bragging about how much they work: in terms of well past midnight, 6-7 days per week, 12+ hour days etc.
What is the end game here?
Good job grinding. But it’s v hard to innovate + ship quality sleep deprived…
Speaking for myself: yes, when I’m locked on a problem I’ll work more *to get it done.*
But when I regularly pull late nights, my work (+mood, judgement) gets worse, not better.
Best work is (and has been) usually after taking enough rest and being full of energy+motivation.
Lots of interesting takes. This one on Bsky got me thinking as I can emphasize with it (and the general feeling that many/most AI startups likely have, esp seeing how important first-mover advantage is…)
Being an AI tech startup is great for funding, but tons of pressure
Automattic - the creator of WordPress, a company raising $950M in VC funding - took a paid WordPress plugin built and owned by another dev and re-published it, making it free.
If you have a business selling a paid WP plugin: Automattic can null it, anytime.
I used to be a big Automattic / WordPress fan (my blog used WordPress for many years, and I admire companies investing in open source.)
Automattic has turned into a corporation ignoring open source ethics though, in its bid to take out its biggest rival WP Engine.blog.pragmaticengineer.com/did-automattic…
WP was so popular in part thanks to the tens of thousands of plugins - built by devs who liked the platform.
This trust is slowly but surely gone. Devs who would have chosen WP don't do so. And so the platform grows less.
Automattic hurting all of WordPress. Maybe on purpose?
And yes, Sonos used to have a great software experience.
I got my first Sonos around 2019 or so I think - and the setup and tuning were very nice (positioning speakers in a room for best performance.) Worked well for me at least.
Major banks skipped due diligence on the deal when providing massive loans to the world's wealthiest person buying Twitter for $44B, assuming they would make a quick buck by selling on these loans.
But they cannot sell it on and make money on it?
The full story by WSJ:
It's hard to feel sorry for massive banks that don't make the quick buck they expected to do, because they loaned for an objectively terrible deal? (Twitter was sold for 2-3x the value of Snap, despite fewer users, similar rev)wsj.com/tech/elon-musk…
FWIW Snap today:
- Has ~2x as many users as we can assume X has (Snap: more than 800M MAU)
- Has ~2x as much annual revenue (about $5B)
- Is worth $15B
... meaning X would be valued no more than $15B today, most likely.