I wonder where the enormous amounts of weapons flooding into Ukraine might end up? Do you think it will be with the nice, moderate forces, or the most extremist forces such as those nice neo-Nazi gentlemen in the Azov? Might this cause problems in the future: Syria & Afghanistan?
If you say that only a Kremlin agent or a pro-Putin apologist would care about such consequences of emotionally cathartic policies, these questions will blissfully disappear.
Yes, @IAPonomarenko may have explicitly and repeatedly proclaimed his "brotherhood" with an actual heavily armed neo-Nazi militia, but he seems nice, and at least he's not Russian.
That the Azov Battalion and other similar groups in Ukraine were a serious neo-Nazi threat was commonly discussed in the Western press -- until about 3 weeks ago when it became taboo. I wrote about it in 2015 when James Clapper wanted to send arms there:
Beyond the banal but sleazy corruption, Burisma's payments to Hunter Biden reveal who elites in Ukraine recognize wield the real power in their country. They didn't pay the son of a Ukrainian official, but Joe Biden's son. So of course CNN bans any guest from mentioning this:👇
I cannot recommend highly enough the 2015 Oliver Stone doc on the history of Ukraine and the 2014 regime change to a more pro-US/EU government. After Rumble uploaded the film following Google's removal from the producer's page, it's been viewed 500k times
As @SusanSarandon says, what is Google so afraid of with this film? Suddenly, after *6 years,* it decides the film contains footage "too graphic" to allow? Numerous films/reports on Ukraine aligned with the US/NATO view are just as graphic, yet remain:
We don't know if biological weapons are in Ukraine. We do know there are dangerous "biological research facilities" there: which we know because Victoria Nuland, shocking Rubio, warned about.
But the history of US programs gives the lie to WH denials about bioweapons in general.
It's been amazing to watch the entire US corporate media -- from the NYT to certain Pentagon reporters on Fox -- unite to *proclaim* that concerns about bio weapons labs in Ukraine are *false.* They 100% *do not know that*: they only CIA/DoD denies it.
After YouTube notified the producers of Oliver Stone's Ukraine film that it was removing it from their channel, @rumblevideo uploaded the film. In less than a day, it's been viewed more than 150k times. Watch with a critical eye, but highly recommended:
This thread reveals one of the most alarming episodes yet for free information and state censorship. The EU has *ordered* search engines and social media companies to suppress and/or disappear Russian news outlets. Defending democracy through repression:
The neocon's confession does not justify Russia's invasion and bombardment of Ukraine. But it does shed critical light on the U.S. role in Ukraine, and raises vital questions about these labs that deserve answers -- including why self-anointed "fact-checkers" declared this False.
It is also notable how Nuland - a hard-core neocon from one of America's royal neocon families - went from being Dick Cheney's national security adviser to running Ukraine for Obama and Biden. Except when Trump was president, she's always in power: showing the two-party lockstep.
Ukraine has "biological research facilities," says Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland, when asked by Sen Rubio if Ukraine has biological or chemical weapons, and says she's worried Russia may get them. But she says she's 100% sure if there's a biological attack, it's Russia.
Really good cleanup by Rubio: interrupting Nuland's bizarre confession, which he did not expect, and immediately directing her to say that if there's a biological attack, it must be Russia.
Why is she so concerned Russia would seize such a benign "biological research facility"?
It's one of those odd yet revealing facts of Washington than under both Obama and now Biden, the person in charge of Ukraine policy at the State Department is a hard-core neocon from the royal neocon Kagan family. Beloved by both parties: