Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Johnny Vedmore Profile picture
@JohnnyVedmore
Mar 10, 2022 • 18 tweets • 8 min read • Read on X
This is it! Explosive!! 🤯👇👇

This is the true story of the men who recruited Schwab via a CIA funded course & who were the REAL driving force behind the creation of the WEF.

Klaus Schwab: or How the CFR Taught Me to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

unlimitedhangout.com/2022/03/invest…
Welcome to a Swabian Thread:

For those who wish to begin understanding the real life & rise to power of Klaus Schwab, it is best to start at the beginning.

Schwab Family Values takes you forward from the 1870s & through Schwabs formative years.

unlimitedhangout.com/2021/02/invest…
Klaus Schwab’s father was a man named Eugen Schwab. He worked for a ‘Model Nazi Company’ called Escher Wyss and managed the companies Ravensberg factory.

Schwab’s Nazi factory made large turbines for the secret Nazi heavy water-based atomic bomb project.

Image
Image
Image
In the early 1960s, Eugen Schwab would tell his son Klaus that to really succeed he’d have to study at Harvard, amongst the people who were focused on the Cold War threat of thermonuclear war & deterrence.

Klaus would leave for Harvard in 1965.

world-today-news.com/klaus-schwab-o…
Klaus wouldn’t take a specific course at Harvard, instead he was invited to be a participant in Henry A Kissinger’s “International Seminar” which had been set up by CFR grandee William Yandell Elliott & received $146.00 in funding from the CIA.

thecrimson.com/article/1967/4…
Image
Schwab was soon noticed & recruited by Kissinger, who would introduce Schwab to two other very powerful US political advisors who’d help Schwab create the World Economic Forum.

The first of these men was a CFR member named John Kenneth Galbraith.

Image
Image
Image
Galbraith was professor to JFK, had married a lady who’d lived with Hitlers girlfriend, & went to Germany in 1938 to study land policies under Hitler.

As WWII ended, Galbraith would be sent back to Germany to interrogate Albert Speer, one of the highest ranking Nazi officials. Image
Later, Galbraith served under Kennedy, even drafting the Johnson 1st speech after JFKs assassination.

By the late 60s, Galbraith had joined forces with Kissinger. Galbraith would travel to Europe to help Schwab recruit for the 1st Davos.

He was the WEF’s 1st key note speaker. Image
The 2nd man who Kissinger introduced to Schwab was Herman Kahn, often described as the real Dr Strangelove.

Herman Kahn’s Hudson Institute had been working on thermonuclear disaster planning and mapping out the potential political repercussions from using nuclear deterrence. Image
In 1961, Herman Kahn would produce his seminal work, ‘On Thermonuclear War’ which would, a few years later, be parodied in Stanley Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove.

By 1966, Kahn was working for the state department and predicting the future of technology.

In 1967, Kahn would produce, The Year 2000, which would successfully predict most of the major technological advancements we would see today.

Although not all the predicted tech was actually achieved by the millennium, the document is still proving to be accurate today.

Image
Image
Image
Kahn would be introduced to Schwab around the same time as he was writing this document.

Schwab would spend the rest of his life trying to make Kahn’s predictions reality, irrelevant of any potential dangers, or even the many warnings from Kahn himself.

archive.org/details/year20…
Alongside ‘The Year 2000’, Kahn would produce another ancillary document which would map out how to achieve the future he’d envisioned.

In this document, Kahn would map out what would essentially become the WEF Young Global Leader program, but in 1967.

archive.org/details/ERIC_E…
Herman Kahn would travel to Europe with Galbraith to help sell the WEF project (initially called the European Management Symposium) to prospective partners.

He’d be one of the draws of the 1st Davos and would watch Galbraith give the 1st keynote address.

nytimes.com/1997/01/28/bus…
When Schwab left Harvard in 1967, he would be contacted by Peter Schmidheiny of Escher-Wyss, Schwab’s fathers old Nazi Model Company.

He would easily convince Schwab to help him with a major merger between Sulzer & Escher-Wyss to create Sulzer AG.

de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Sch…
The company Schwab created would also aid the South African Apartheid regime in their illegal thermonuclear bomb program.

Yes, like father, like son. Both Schwab’s would help genocidal racist regimes to try to gain atomic & nuclear weapons.

books.google.cl/books?id=dvSX8…
After the launch of the forum in 1971, & due to the support of Kissinger, Kahn & Galbraith, Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum was up & running. But the forum would stall in its 2nd year.

So, for the 3rd Davos, Klaus Schwab would get Malthusian.

widgets.weforum.org/history/1973.h…
In 1973, Aurellio Peccei head of the Club of Rome would promote their 1972 report “The Limits to Growth” as Schwab’s chosen keynote speaker.

Peccei’s Davos speech suggested using climate change to control public opinion & declared human beings themselves to be the new enemy. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Johnny Vedmore

Johnny Vedmore Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnnyVedmore

Johnny Vedmore Profile picture
Jan 19
Epstein 101: Blackmail and Extortion - A @JohnnyVedmore Read Through

To truly realize what Epstein & Maxwell had designed & to understand influence operations more generally, you must first be able to tell the difference between blackmail & extortion.

Read the Article Below👇

🧵1/8
Epstein 101: Blackmail and Extortion by @JohnnyVedmore

Epstein and Maxwell’s primary goal was to infiltrate the halls of power. Their priority targets were those Democratic politicians who had the potential to make it to the White House. To truly realize what Epstein and Maxwell had designed and understand influence operations more generally, you must first be able to tell the difference between blackmail and extortion.

Before investigating the complex criminal enterprise created by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, any commentator needs to understand the crimes which were being perpetuated by the couple. Many people refer to Epstein and Maxwell’s main sexual compromise operations as “sex blackmail” and you will often hear the word “blackmail” being bandied about by the media discussing this enthralling and dark example of organized sexual exploitation.

You may also be led to believe that, as this is one of the most well-researched cases in modern history, every angle has been examined. However, the operation they ran and how it functioned is not fully understood by most, and the facts often take a back seat to the many more salacious scandals involving politicians and celebrities.

The majority of those interested in the case assume that the famous faces who were targeted by Epstein’s operation were simply being blackmailed and they don’t truly understand the nuance involved in such an intelligence operation. However, Epstein and Maxwell were not just blackmailing people they were mostly extorting their targets, the difference between blackmail and extortion must be understood if you truly wish to realize the seriousness of the crimes committed by these infamous international child traffickers.

🧵2/8Image
A History of ‘Black Mal’

The term “blackmail” is believed to have been first used in Scotland during the 1500s and it is supposed to have originated from “black mal”. This term was a way to describe a payment farmers and property owners made to prospective plunderers in return for not having their land damaged. Linguistically speaking, the modern way in which we use blackmail is a combination of two separate terms, with the modern usage becoming a combination of black money (“black”) and rent (derived from an old Scandinavian word “mal” meaning “agreement.”)

Unlike modern times, in early Scottish law, both sides of a blackmail scheme were considered criminals. The Laws and Customes of Scotland, published in the 17th century allows us the insight behind the reasoning for also prosecuting the victims of a blackmail scheme, stating clearly,:

“The reason the givers are liable is because they maintain the thieves.”

For most people, the concept of blackmailing an individual or an organizational structure seems a relatively simple process to identify and understand. But, like any illicit activity, blackmail is much more complex and nuanced than most people can first comprehend.

Blackmail is regularly defined as an attempt to obtain money, goods, or favours from a person by threatening to publicize information that would incriminate, embarrass, or otherwise socially damage the victim. For blackmail to exist a few constituent parts are required. Firstly, there needs to be a perpetrator and, although it is often perceived as a “white-collar crime”, in reality, anyone can commit blackmail. Secondly, a blackmailer requires a victim and, even though anyone can become a victim of blackmail, the most likely targets of these operations are people with political power who have access to government or corporate secrets, however. the most important factor for a perpetrator of blackmail is that their target has financial resources. Thirdly, once a perpetrator has identified their target, they issue their demands followed by a threat to reveal socially or economically damaging information if those requirements are not met. But there are many contradictions both legally and practically concerning the subject of blackmail.

Sidney Wallace DeLong, a Professor at Seattle University’s School of Law, has spent his academic career studying the legal aspects of blackmail, bribery and extortion, and has become one of the foremost experts on these subjects within law. In a 1993 paper by DeLong, entitled Blackmailers, Bribe Takers, and The Second Paradox which was published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, DeLong explains:

“The criminalization of blackmail has been considered paradoxical because it would make unlawful a threat to do something the threatener has a legal right to do. The blackmailer threatens to disclose an embarrassing or harmful secret of the victim unless she is paid for secrecy. She may lawfully disclose the victim’s secret? and may lawfully make an unconditional threat to disclose it. The threat becomes unlawful only when coupled with an offer to keep the secret in return for payment. Yet, most victims of blackmail would presumably prefer such an offer to an unconditional threat: the offer cannot make the victim worse off than the unconditional threat and it might make him better off by giving him an opportunity to buy the menace’s silence. Thus, it seems paradoxical to permit the unconditional threat and prohibit blackmail.”

Within a decade of DeLong’s aforementioned paper, his work had influenced other thinkers to call for blackmail to be made legal. In another study of blackmail, which was published in the Business Ethics Quarterly in 2000, and which heavily quotes DeLong’s work, the authors of the paper entitled, The Second Paradox of Blackmail, begin by explaining:

“One so-called paradox of blackmail concerns the fact that two legal whites together make a black. That is, it is illicit to threaten to reveal a person’s secret, and it is separately lawful to ask him for money; but when both are undertaken at once, together, this act is called blackmail and is prohibited. The second so-called paradox is that if the blackmailer initiates the act, this is seen by jurists as blackmail and illicit, while if the blackmailee (the person blackmailed) originates the contract, this is commonly interpreted as bribery and is not illicit.”

What is intriguing about this paper in particular – written whilst Epstein and Maxwell’s blackmail operation was arguably at its peak – is that its authors, Block, Kinsella and Hope, use libertarian theory to reject the claim that blackmail should be unlawful, going on to claim that:

“If this act (blackmail) were legalized, then both paradoxes would disappear.”

Although many of us may be found wincing at the idea of legalizing blackmail, DeLong’s work, and that of other libertarian-leaning scholars, continue to make a case for the legalization of blackmail to this very day. In a 2020 critique of the so-called ‘MeToo’ movement, DeLong released his paper, Paradigm Shift: #MeToo and the Paradox of Bribery Secrets, published in the University of the Pacific Law Review. In this journal piece, DeLong does make it clear that the legalization of blackmail should only be applied “so long as what is threatened is not itself tortious or criminal.”

Even within the more extreme beliefs about the consequences of blackmail, it seems to be an accepted fact that some forms of blackmail are considered to be wholly unacceptable regardless of one’s ideological leanings. In the Epstein and Maxwell case, to successfully blackmail their chosen targets, the duo had to break a variety of laws in many countries.

To define Epstein and Maxwell’s industrial sex compromise operation, we must first define whether what they were doing would be wholly considered blackmail or was the much more serious crime of extortion. Many people assume that blackmail and extortion are the same actions. Both extortion and blackmail are forms of coercion and both constitute the use of threats to manipulate the actions of the victim to the benefit of the blackmailer/extortioner and/or their co-conspirators. Blackmail is a subset of extortion that uses specific threats to release damaging information about the victim. However, extortion, which like blackmail is a form of “coercion for benefit”, is accompanied by threats that can include violence, kidnapping, destruction of property or reputation, or, most pertinently, the misuse of government office.

When we examine the Epstein/Maxwell sex compromise operation it is clear that we are not dealing with simple blackmailers but, instead, their operation involved the extortion of their chosen marks. Even the most far-reaching libertarian-led, DeLong-inspired, legal eagles are unable to find a way to make Epstein and Maxwell’s operation legally acceptable. Yet, regardless of the words we use here, commonly, the majority of Epstein and Maxwell’s behaviour will continue to be described as “blackmail” whether or not it’s the most accurate term to use.

🧵3/8Professor Sidney DeLong addressing graduates at the 2018 Seattle Commencement Ceremony. (Courtesy of Seattle University)
Read 8 tweets
Johnny Vedmore Profile picture
Oct 31, 2024
Musk & Epstein: The Third Culture Dossier by @JohnnyVedmore

"How Elon Musk Was Trained in Psychological Manipulation via a Jeffrey Epstein-Funded Program."

Read it here🧵1/20

newspaste.com/2024/10/31/mus…
Musk & Epstein: The Third Culture Dossier - A @JohnnyVedmore Read Through

Listen to the read-through of the article👇

For more Johnny Vedmore Read Throughs go to youtube.com/playlist?list=…

Support Johnny's in-depth journalism here newspaste.com/home/support-n…

🧵2/20
NEWSHOUND #28 - Musk and Epstein: The Third Culture of Control with @JohnnyVedmore

In this edition of NEWSHOUND, Johnny Vedmore explores the source material behind his NEWSPASTE article Musk & Epstein: The Third Culture.

For more NEWSHOUND go to 🧵3/20 youtube.com/playlist?list=…
Read 20 tweets
Johnny Vedmore Profile picture
Oct 22, 2024
Clinton & Blair: The Third Way Dossier by @JohnnyVedmore

This is how intelligence-linked left-wing British & American politicians betrayed their voters to implement a Globalist centre-ground political ideology called "The Third Way”.

Read it here🧵1/11

newspaste.com/2024/10/22/bla…
Blair and Clinton: The Third Way Dossier - A @JohnnyVedmore Read Through

Listen to the read through of the article👇

For more Johnny Vedmore Read Through's go to youtube.com/playlist?list=…

Find ways to support Johnny's in depth journalism here newspaste.com/home/support-n… 🧵2/11
Blair and Clinton: The Third Way Dossier by @JohnnyVedmore with Key Researcher Darren Kenton

This is how British and American politicians deserted their left-wing political leanings to implement a new centre-ground political ideology. The “Third Way” politics, which both Clinton and Blair adopted into the Democratic Party and the Labour Party respectively, saw the suppression of the left and right wings and began to synthesise the two nations into a singular ideological pole of far-west Globalism.

The political powder keg of the Western world has been purposely rigged to explode, with our societies primed to be decimated as a result. The far right is on the rise, and the far left will surely follow. The predictable ascendency of the two wings of the political spectrum is the direct consequence of a certain ideology. Its success has seen all major political parties in the United States and the United Kingdom lurch towards the centre ground, while at the same time purging and suppressing the natural left and right wings of their own political parties. This is the story of how a handful of elite politicians and sociologists have led us to a state of deep division and perpetual unrest.

There are only a handful of leaders who have had such an enormous impact on shaping the world we live in as the former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, and his American counterpart, Bill Clinton. Some of the consequences of their actions while in office will reverberate around the world for decades to come. In this article we’ll trace the training of the New Labour elite via a range of programs, including Rockefeller-founded deep-state leadership programmes, official American election campaigns, and via courses emanating from prestigious universities such as Harvard.

From as early as 1984, the future New Labour top brass were being systematically selected and trained within the halls of elite universities such as Harvard and MIT, where they were being directly influenced by movers and shakers such as Larry Summers, Robert Reich and Bill Clinton. This new wave of centre-left politicians was being influenced by an alternative political ideology, or maybe it should be referred to as a new political magic trick, called the “Third Way”. Its creator Anthony Giddens was once described as “the originator of Tony Blair’s ‘Third Way’ politics” by Daily Mail journalist Michael Seamark, and Giddens’ influence on the relationship which formed between America and Britain cannot be understated.

When Tony Blair was elected as Prime Minister, he didn’t only align the United Kingdom with American foreign policy, Blair also aligned the UK with Bill Clinton’s New Democrat version of Third Way centrism. This is the story of how Blair and Clinton used Giddens’s teachings to force the US and UK to become a far-Western pole of multi-polar Globalism.

🧵3/11Image
Read 13 tweets
Johnny Vedmore Profile picture
Oct 4, 2024
This was awesome 👇

@MonicaPerezShow and I went through various deep research techniques.

It was such a pleasure to speak with someone who's so passionate about research.

x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
@MonicaPerezShow These are the articles we discuss:

David Shaw and the Rise of Jeff Bezos

@MonicaPerezShow Eric R. Weinstein's "Great Replacement"

Read 8 tweets
Johnny Vedmore Profile picture
Sep 15, 2024
Ryan Wesley Routh👇

Apparently, Trump’s latest would-be assassin.

Find him on X at x.com/ryanrouth
Image
Ryan Routh’s posts on X which include Trump 👇

He also claims that he’s going to: “fight and die for Ukraine.” Seems like that’s unlikely now.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Ryan Routh was born on 18 February 1966, and is registered as living in Hawaii most recently, although he previously lived in Greensboro NC and Julian NC.

Ryan maintains relationships with many family members, including Oran, Adam, Sara, Destiny & Lora Routh.
Read 11 tweets
Johnny Vedmore Profile picture
Jun 23, 2023
It begins! 👇

One man connects Watergate, Kent State Massacre, MLK, Letelier, Wounded Knee, Iran Contra, the October Surprise & the case against Epstein.

Welcome to The Pottinger Identity: The Road to the Takedown of Jeffrey Epstein by @JohnnyVedmore

newspaste.com/2023/06/23/the…
The Pottinger series is a NEWSPASTE Original which will explore the history of one of the most prominent lawyers involved in the case against Jeffrey Epstein.

Each article will also be accompanied by a NEWSHOUND which will explore the source material.

rokfin.com/post/139572/NE…
John Pottinger Sr. was an insurance man, Scottish Rites - 32nd degree plus Freemason, a Bohemian Grover & a City Commissioner in Dayton, Oh.

He died in 1958 shortly after sailing to the Soviet Union with his son J. Stanley Pottinger, who later gave lectures about the experience.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(