David Rothkopf Profile picture
Mar 11 5 tweets 2 min read
This is a sign that China is continuing to make the wrong choices with regard to this war. That does not mean they cannot be of help ending it. It does not bode well however for their aspirations to lead on the international stage.
At this point it should become clear to all nations that this is not a traditional, Cold War style conflict in which there are 2 points of view. This is not geopolitical business as usual. This is binary. Right vs. wrong. There's no justification for what Russia has done.
The world has spoken with remarkable clarity and near unanimity on this. Every Russian explanation for their actions has been either a lie or an outrageous lie. Every Russian promise has been broken. Russia has consistently violated international laws and the rules of warfare.
And Ukraine did nothing to provoke this and has conducted themselves only with bravery throughout, even as the women and children of that country become cannon fodder for Putin's twisted mission to recreate a Tsarist vision of what a Russian empire should look like.
Countries (and companies) are either on the right side of this or the wrong side and seeking to remain neutral is being on the wrong side. There is too much at stake here. The moral choice is too clearcut.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djrothkopf

Mar 12
The leader of the GOP did not embrace Putin (or other despots) out of ignorance. He knew what they did. And he admired it. He would "joke" he wished he could brutalize the press like they did. He wanted to suppress dissent like they did. He wanted to shoot peaceful protestors...
...and send in the 82d Airborne division against BLM protestors. He defended right wing thugs. He encouraged people at his rallies to use violence against those with political views. He welcomed and defended Russian attacks on our democracy.
Trump tried to block sanctions against Russia for its abuses and railed furiously when they were imposed against Russia for using chemical weapons against Putin's enemies in the UK. Trump promoted a coup against American democracy.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 12
For those who suggest that the greatest deterrent to Russia chemical weapons use (or similar violation) in Ukraine is that Putin would immediately and forever be seen as a pariah, please see history. Russia is already an established user & enabler of chemical weapons use.
In Syria. Against its enemies. And that compounded with the wanton brutality of Russia from Chechnya to Syria to Ukraine, its use of banned munitions from cluster bombs to thermobaric weapons, and its brutality against its own citizens, should tell you all you need to know.
Putin has already established he is immune to global condemnation, has no concern for international laws or conventions and sees his cruelty as a useful tool in advancing his ambitions. The only way to stop him is to defeat him. It is not to shame or condemn him.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 12
World War III is not going to happen. Not as a result of this war anyway. In fact, with the strengthening of NATO and the weakening of Russia, global conflagration though not a zero possibility remains extremely unlikely. But before you go to bed this Friday night...
...give a thought to what is going to happen. A nation, already being destroyed, is going to be further shattered. Tens of thousands will die. Mothers & children. Grandmothers & grandfathers. Soldiers & aid workers. Politicians & farmers. Tens of thousands will be injured.
War crimes, already begun, will get worse. Damage, already probably over $100 billion will double and triple. Much...families, businesses, communities, cultural treasures...will be forever lost, no amount of reconstruction can restore them.
Read 17 tweets
Mar 11
The question that continues to trouble me is what happens in the event Russia does use chemical weapons? What would happen if they did create a disaster at Chernobyl? No one wins WWIII. But we've already deployed most of our sanctions options. What do Europeans do? The US?
Sadly, my thoughts to turn to Syria where the world offered press releases of condemnation after chemical attacks and in the end resigned themselves to what amounts to an Assad victory (and one for his Russian buddies.)
There are plenty of int'l institutions we could kick Russia out of...but will that achieve anything? We can offer more support to Ukraine...but what exactly? And what steps can we take to ensure it doesn't happen again? So far all the answers I see floated seem inadequate.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 11
The fact that every single act of barbarity in which Putin has participated has been, in his eyes, a success from Chechnya to Syria to Georgia to Crimea to poisoning opposition and tossing them off balconies, has led us to this point.
Socipaths like him take and abuse until they are stopped. They are not shamed into stopping. They are not lectured into stopping. Slaps on the wrist or ominous warnings will not stop them. Red lines must be enforced. Defeats must be inflicted. Losses must be substantial.
That is not an excuse for recklessness. It is an argument to be resolute and recognize our strategic goal must not be to limit the damage he does but rather to convince him that he will pay such a great price for his crimes that he will not undertake them.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 10
I'm not going to win any points for saying this but the Biden Admin international team has been doing exceptional work from the outset. They have restored international standing, strengthened alliances, rejoined multilateral institutions, elevated US diplomacy.
The list of accomplishments is long: the leadership in this conflict is historic and will be studied & emulated for generations. But they rejoined the Paris Accord, rejoined the World Health Organization, led the global fight against the pandemic, and ended America's longest war.
Yes...the courageous decision to get out of Afghanistan was the right decision and while the exit from that country could certainly have been handled better, the net benefits were great (including giving us the bandwidth and resources to face key challenges of today).
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(