World War III is not going to happen. Not as a result of this war anyway. In fact, with the strengthening of NATO and the weakening of Russia, global conflagration though not a zero possibility remains extremely unlikely. But before you go to bed this Friday night...
...give a thought to what is going to happen. A nation, already being destroyed, is going to be further shattered. Tens of thousands will die. Mothers & children. Grandmothers & grandfathers. Soldiers & aid workers. Politicians & farmers. Tens of thousands will be injured.
War crimes, already begun, will get worse. Damage, already probably over $100 billion will double and triple. Much...families, businesses, communities, cultural treasures...will be forever lost, no amount of reconstruction can restore them.
Those who survive will never feel fully safe ever again. Here's what else is going to happen, those who are responsible for this will probably get away with it. Some will lose money. Some may even not be able to live the lifestyle they once lived.
But to end the suffering, a deal will be cut, the perpetrators will be allowed to withdraw. Their illegal war will have achieved nothing except destruction. But the planet will want to move on. Sanctions will be lifted too soon. Armchair historians will opine.
They will say "remember Germany after WW I," we mustn't be too harsh. But of course, Germany's anger was due to having lost the war and due to the incompetence of its Weimar leaders. Hitler rise had many roots. Many nationalist strains & prejudices had existed for centuries.
And part of the problem was that as Hitler violated the terms of the armistice world leaders chose to look away. So the analogy, and rest assured it will be made, is not appropriate. Rather we should look and see what happened to Russia...
...after it obliterated Grozny, after it helped do the same to Syria, after it invaded Georgia and stole Crimea. What happened? Not much. The message that was sent to Vladimir Putin was that the world doesn't care, that the most brutal player sets the rules of the game.
We should prosecute war criminals. We should maintain sanctions until Russia pays for rebuilding Ukraine. We should demand Russia pulls back from the borders of its vulnerable neighbors. We should require that they & all nations enter into talks to eliminate nuclear weapons.
We should make it clear that nothing will be normalized until Putin goes. We should make it clear that those who aided Russia will also pay a high price, not just during this war but long after. We should seek not retribution but justice, not just a cease fire but lasting peace.
We should. But honestly, even with the wisdom and competence of the current set of leaders in the Western Alliance, I doubt the above will happen. NATO will be stronger. Ukraine will get rebuilt--probably with the help of its friends. Other aspects of the solution will be...
...deeply galling but honestly, that should be up to the people of Ukraine and one can hardly blame them if they want to stop the suffering. (Though I'm sympathetic to the view that Russia has fared so poorly that with enough support, they might be defeated.
It's a long shot. But defeat is another of the tools we have to try to ensure this doesn't happen again. Defeat is what should have happened but didn't after all Putin's previous violations.) But, the pain is immense and so if compromises are the choice of Ukraine, so be it.
But the rest of the world should recognize the massive failures of how we dealt with Putin in the past. (To their credit, their response this time has been much more robust and that is a very good thing.) We should seek long term solutions not just an end to all this.
But my guess is we won't. I hope I'm wrong. I hope Ukraine triumphs on the battlefield and the world does not simply accept a return to a status quo ante of a month ago as an acceptable outcome and that true justice is sought.
But late on this Friday night, after a week of horrors in Ukraine, my fear is not of the nuclear catastrophe that probably won't happen but of a horrifying outcome that is much more likely, the one that looks like what is happening now...
...and when that looks like what has happened during and after similar Russian atrocities in the not too distant past.
Sorry for such dark thoughts, but perhaps by thinking them, as with considering the possibility of nuclear war, we can ensure they do not happen.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Putin likely knows he cannot win in Ukraine in the sense that he cannot take control of the country and maintain that control. He cannot make Ukraine a vassal state like Belarus. So, it seems likely that for him, the next best option is to destroy Ukraine with maximum brutality.
In so doing, he will be able to say he neutralized Ukraine's threat to Russia. He will send a warning to neighbors that this is what awaits them if he sees them as a threat. And perhaps most importantly, he will send a message to the world that he can act w/complete impunity.
What awaits Ukraine is almost certainly worse than anything we have seen to date. Re: the last point above, Putin will cross red lines to prove that he can do so. He likely believes that communicates a message of power to his people and to the world.
The leader of the GOP did not embrace Putin (or other despots) out of ignorance. He knew what they did. And he admired it. He would "joke" he wished he could brutalize the press like they did. He wanted to suppress dissent like they did. He wanted to shoot peaceful protestors...
...and send in the 82d Airborne division against BLM protestors. He defended right wing thugs. He encouraged people at his rallies to use violence against those with political views. He welcomed and defended Russian attacks on our democracy.
Trump tried to block sanctions against Russia for its abuses and railed furiously when they were imposed against Russia for using chemical weapons against Putin's enemies in the UK. Trump promoted a coup against American democracy.
For those who suggest that the greatest deterrent to Russia chemical weapons use (or similar violation) in Ukraine is that Putin would immediately and forever be seen as a pariah, please see history. Russia is already an established user & enabler of chemical weapons use.
In Syria. Against its enemies. And that compounded with the wanton brutality of Russia from Chechnya to Syria to Ukraine, its use of banned munitions from cluster bombs to thermobaric weapons, and its brutality against its own citizens, should tell you all you need to know.
Putin has already established he is immune to global condemnation, has no concern for international laws or conventions and sees his cruelty as a useful tool in advancing his ambitions. The only way to stop him is to defeat him. It is not to shame or condemn him.
The question that continues to trouble me is what happens in the event Russia does use chemical weapons? What would happen if they did create a disaster at Chernobyl? No one wins WWIII. But we've already deployed most of our sanctions options. What do Europeans do? The US?
Sadly, my thoughts to turn to Syria where the world offered press releases of condemnation after chemical attacks and in the end resigned themselves to what amounts to an Assad victory (and one for his Russian buddies.)
There are plenty of int'l institutions we could kick Russia out of...but will that achieve anything? We can offer more support to Ukraine...but what exactly? And what steps can we take to ensure it doesn't happen again? So far all the answers I see floated seem inadequate.
The fact that every single act of barbarity in which Putin has participated has been, in his eyes, a success from Chechnya to Syria to Georgia to Crimea to poisoning opposition and tossing them off balconies, has led us to this point.
Socipaths like him take and abuse until they are stopped. They are not shamed into stopping. They are not lectured into stopping. Slaps on the wrist or ominous warnings will not stop them. Red lines must be enforced. Defeats must be inflicted. Losses must be substantial.
That is not an excuse for recklessness. It is an argument to be resolute and recognize our strategic goal must not be to limit the damage he does but rather to convince him that he will pay such a great price for his crimes that he will not undertake them.
This is a sign that China is continuing to make the wrong choices with regard to this war. That does not mean they cannot be of help ending it. It does not bode well however for their aspirations to lead on the international stage.
At this point it should become clear to all nations that this is not a traditional, Cold War style conflict in which there are 2 points of view. This is not geopolitical business as usual. This is binary. Right vs. wrong. There's no justification for what Russia has done.
The world has spoken with remarkable clarity and near unanimity on this. Every Russian explanation for their actions has been either a lie or an outrageous lie. Every Russian promise has been broken. Russia has consistently violated international laws and the rules of warfare.