When someone brings up bad things the US does in response to outrage over bad things Russia does, it's not to defend Russia. It's to get the US to stop doing bad things.
Bleating "whataboutism" at sincere attempts to get the US empire to stop doing evil things is just defending those evil things.
You're basically just saying "Shut up! Now's not the time to talk about the bad things the US power alliance does, we're on something else right now!" Okay, so when? Nothing has ever been done about the crimes of the empire. No meaningful changes whatsoever were made after Iraq.
Russia invading Ukraine doesn't magically erase the fact that the western empire has spent the 21st century slaughtering people by the millions in wars of aggression and working to destroy any nation which disobeys it. That still needs to be talked about, and still needs to end.
The murderousness, tyranny and omnicidal recklessness of the US-centralized empire is a problem of unequalled urgency regardless of what Russia happens to be doing. You can't just bleat "whataboutism" and make that go away. It's a problem that urgently needs to be dealt with.
It's an objectively good thing if more attention is brought to that urgent problem by someone saying "Oh you're upset about this war? Wait til you hear about what your own government has been doing." Any attempt to interfere in their pointing this out is facilitating mass murder.
Putin will have to work very, very hard to catch up to these numbers. Either help draw attention to this problem or stop interrupting people who are drawing attention to it with power-serving gibberish about "whataboutery".
People talk about this like it's something in the past, something the US and its allies did back in history but now it's Russia doing it. No, this is happening *currently* in Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria, Venezuela etc, and will continue to happen unless drastic changes are made.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Johnstone ⏳

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @caitoz

Mar 12
Find me two opening paragraphs in any Russian state media outlet that are more brazenly propagandistic and demonstrate lower journalistic standards than this.
washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
Third paragraph is arguably even more egregious, because it says this without ever once mentioning Victoria Nuland's admission before the Senate that Ukraine has “biological research facilities” that the US is “quite concerned” might end up “falling into the hands” of Russians.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 11
Everyone seems to get that Russia stands everything to gain by lying about what's happening on the ground in Ukraine. Not many seem to get that Ukraine does too. Kyiv's only chance at victory is drawing NATO powers into direct conflict. Atrocity propaganda facilitates this goal.
Atrocity propaganda has been around to some degree for as long as war and media have coexisted. Its use has a very long and extensively documented history, and there's no reason whatsoever to believe it isn't used copiously today.
The US-centralized empire also has its own agendas that would be greatly facilitated by atrocity propaganda, such as manufacturing consent for unprecedented acts of worldwide economic warfare. This has been underway since before the invasion even began.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 11
The western oligarchic empire is propagandizing and censoring as though it is in a direct hot war with Russia. Officially we're not at war, but the behavior of the empire's propaganda outlets in the news media and narrative management institutions in Silicon Valley say otherwise.
There's almost too many of these to keep track of now. It's a daily occurrence. We've never seen anything remotely like this before.
Just absolutely freakish levels of narrative control.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 11
Umm… Are We The Baddies?

"It certainly is interesting that the fight for freedom and democracy requires so much censorship, warmongering, xenophobia, propaganda and bloodlust."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/umm-are-we-t…
Umm… Are We The Baddies? (Audio)

"Reuters reports that Facebook and Instagram are now allowing calls for the death of Russians and Russian leaders in exemption from the platforms' hate speech terms of service due to the war in Ukraine."
soundcloud.com/going_rogue/um…
"Meta Platforms will allow Facebook and Instagram users in some countries to call for violence against Russians and Russian soldiers in the context of the Ukraine invasion, according to internal emails seen by Reuters on Thursday"
Read 30 tweets
Mar 10
What is the argument here? That in the English-speaking world there's not enough criticism of Putin's invasion and too much criticism of NATO aggression? That if more of us scream about Putin he'll go "Ah shit I pissed off a few fringe westerners, let's cancel the war you guys"?
I don't mean to pick on Jordan specifically, I see this argument everywhere, and it just makes no sense to me. Our voices can do far more good criticizing the actions of our own governments that receive barely any criticism than those of someone else's government which gets tons.
It can't be denied that there's a major propaganda push to manufacture consent for dangerous agendas which pre-date the invasion by many years. Is my voice better used opposing those dangerous agendas, or in helping to facilitate them by saying what everyone else is saying today?
Read 4 tweets
Mar 9
Really not feeling great about how much mainstream western punditry boils down to "What's the maximum amount we can provoke and attack Russia without starting a nuclear war? Some say the line is here, but I think it's probably further back."
I mean, like, what about Putin's recent actions suggests that this is the sort of person you want to take chances with? And not just chances, but *the most consequential chances humanly possible*?
You never quite know who's listening to who; what actual decision maker is listening to what dumbass warmongering thought leader. And just the fact that these ideas are gaining so much mainstream traction can be enough to adjust the other side's calculations in a dangerous way.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(