Here's a conservative magazine in 1976 selling itself to readers as a refreshing and more trustworthy alternative to an overly liberal "mainstream media" that hated America. The publisher of that magazine was the John Birch Society.
FWIW, in 1976 the head of the JBS, Robert Welch, believed that the world was run by a conspiracy with its roots in the Bavarian Illuminati. He expected that conspiracy to destroy America and set up a UN-run One World Government in 1976, but that prediction didn't come true.
When it didn't come true, he credited the John Birch Society with successfully staving off that One World Government takeover, at least for the time being. So yeah, clearly a more reliable news source than Time or Newsweek.
You can hear Welch giving a quick summary of his Illuminati theory here.
The first iteration of the "Illuminati Conspiracy" in US politics was 1798, when many Federalists used it to whip up support for President John Adams and opposition to Thomas Jefferson and the politicians who allied with him.
Anyway, this is why I deeply despise the seemingly innocuous film National Treasure; because it tapped into and helped breathe new life into this reactionary, Bircher-ite conspiracy theory thread in our political culture.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just finished listening to this entire podcast series and I highly recommend it. npr.org/podcasts/10642…
A couple takeaways. 1) Right wing extremists are almost always liars. The host is too polite/restrained to just say that, but we encounter multiple examples of "leaders" just shamelessly lying about their actions/beliefs in order to try to mainstream themselves.
2) I appreciate that the host identifies the "authoritarian" danger of this extremism. These folks pose a threat to the US because they hate and are working to disrupt most aspects of modern, pluralistic, constitutional, majoritarian democracy.
This stuff is of course, nutso. But believe me when I tell you that in my recent archive visits I’ve seen scores of anti-UN and NWO pamphlets from the 1970s and 80s that read much like this. I saw them in the papers of Walter Huss, the chair of the OR GOP in 1978.
I ran across this in the papers of an Oregon far right evangelical, Walter Huss. He had it because he was doing oppo research on the group to try to get this religious group's tax exempt status revoked for being too political.
Huss was a Foursquare preacher who, from the 1960s into the 90s, used conservative churches across the state to help promote right wing political campaigns. Whenever he experienced pushback or criticism for his theocratic politics, he of course screamed "tyranny!"
What did Arnold Palmer, Alistair Cooke, Alex Trebek, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Norman Podhoretz, Charlton Heston, Barry Goldwater, Richard DeVos, Saul Bellow, Jacques Barzun, Saul Bellow, and Midge Dector have in common in 1996? [Answer in next tweet].
They all served on this Board of Directors.
The organization was US ENGLISH, a group that sought to make English the national language and stave off the perceived threat of a multi-lingual America.
After you watch this, you need to go listen to Season 1 of “The Dream” podcast which is all about the history of Multi-level marketing and its ties to right wing, anti-communist politics in the US.
One interesting thing I’ve learned during my archival research on Walter Huss, the far right activist who became chair of the OR GOP in 1978, is that he participated in about a dozen MLMs in the 70s and 80s. It was probably his primary source of income.
One of the nation’s earliest MLM pyramid schemes was Holiday Magic, started by this John Bircher ultra conservative who ran against Reagan in 1966 *from Reagan’s right.* en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_P…
Compiling a list of the types of people who never have to self-censor. Who did I miss?
--Monarchs and other assorted autocrats
--abusive bosses with a captive workforce
--Assholes with inherited wealth
--People who never leave their extremely homogenous social bubbles
Genuinely struggling to understand why anyone would want to inhabit a world where self-censorship was NOT a widely-shared value.
Perhaps it's not a coincidence that the enemies of self-censorship are often those who embrace a political philosophy that has no place in it for the concept of "society?"