A little story about how Alisher Usmanov threatened to sue me - and what it tells about Western complicity in the functioning of the Russian regime (a 🧵).
For context: Usmanov is a typical Russian oligarch. Obscenely rich, corrupt to the bone, investigated by Navalny (his response: "I spit on you, Alexei!") & fully integrated in the Russian regime's infrastructure (through control of key media and internet assets).
A year ago, Ilya Budraitskis and me published a story on the New Left Review blog about Navalny's plight. Among other things, we said the following: newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/…
"Throughout the 2010s, this populist attitude informed Navalny’s anti-corruption investigations, whose targets were not only state officials, but oligarchs such as Oleg Deripaska and Alisher Usmanov...
...Navalny railed against their acquisition of enormous wealth through the criminal privatization of former Soviet enterprises."
The story was reprinted by the socialist publication International Viewpoint (IV).
In a few days, IV's editor received an email from an "associate" (probably some poor intern) at the fancy London-based PR firm Finsbury Glover Hering. According to the email, what we said in the article was "factually inaccurate and defamatory in relation to Mr Usmanov".
The "associate" proceeded to explain that Usmanov was a saint and our article should be removed from every publication that printed it. Also, we should send a formal apology to Usmanov (what? yes!) Otherwise, the honest businessman would sue the hell out of everyone involved.
Of course, that email went straight to the trash can. Btw, cursory Googling revealed that Finsbury also tried to covertly edit Usmanov's Wikipedia page, removing any mention of unsaintly behaviour (e.g. six years in a Soviet prison for corruption and theft of state property).
The moral of the story: how many "associates" at various PR, legal, finance and consulting companies directly contributed to the prosperity of Russian oligarchs and corrupt public officials abroad? Not just in their business dealings, but in corruption-related activities?
I think, conservatively, this industry employed (still employs?) tens of thousands of people. The Russian regime has immensely benefited from the global (but Western-centric) infrastructure of corruption. Two questions related to this:
1) Is this infrastructure fully dismantled? Is dismantling it a priority in the same way as destroying ordinary Russians' livelihoods is? 2) Isn't it too late for moral posturing by the Western establishment when they had fingers in the pie for so long?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Opinion polls in a dictatorship (thread). Before claiming that "60-70-80% of Russians support Putin, according to the polls", consider two things: 1) non-responses. Lots of people refuse to respond to pollsters, many of them out of fear.
The share of non-responses is not included in the poll results, however, most estimates place it in 30-50% of those surveyed. Out of 150 people, 50 refuse to respond, 30 say they disapprove of Putin and 70 say they approve. What is the actual share of Putin supporters then?
2) Falsification of preferences. Even among those who agree to respond and say they approve of Putin, at least some simply lie - again, out of fear. Bearing in mind these two things, we simply *don't know* the actual number of Putinists in Russia...
Re: boycott of Russian academics. Several people asked how this is different from boycotting South African or Israeli apartheid. @fahad_s_ali helpfully referred to the guidelines written by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI). See:
"Anchored in precepts of international law and universal human rights, the BDS movement, including PACBI, rejects on principle boycotts of individuals based on their identity (such as citizenship, race, gender, or religion) or opinion."
"If, however, an individual is *representing* the state of Israel or a complicit Israeli institution (such as a dean, rector, or president), or is commissioned/recruited to participate in Israel’s efforts to “rebrand” itself...
I'm so disgusted with rejection letters, invitation cancellations, grant withdrawals etc. against Russian scholars from Western academics who fight Putinism by attacking those who have suffered from it for decades.
So encouraging to come home after being chased by riot police and discover that you were excluded from some space/platform b.c. 'you've done too little'. Who are you to judge? You've never risked anything in your life and this costs you nothing.
'It's not about you, it's about the institutions'. And who would teach students and tell them the truth if we abandon the universities? Oh I understand - who cares about Russian students and Russians in general, they're all orcs from Mordor more or less, right?
1) OK, my first thread. Last year I published an academic paper on the interplay of political and economic imperialism in Russia. I did try to read as much as possible and the article is quite comprehensive. I'm sharing it on Academia.edu.
2) In the paper I argue that up until 2014 Russia was negotiating its position within the global capitalist order dominated by the West. It was aiming at the 'subimperialist' role: a regional power with its own political-economic bloc, yet still integrated in the global economy.
3) In 2014, things changed. Instead of 'subimperialist' status, Russia shifted into full-on confrontation with the West. This marked the divergence between the interests of big capital and the state's geopolitical strategy.