Covid antibodies found in stored blood from Sept/Nov 2019 in European blood banks. The implications are enormous.
1. Long before the official start date, it was too late to stop the disease from spreading across the earth. We have wasted 2 years on lockdowns for nothing.
[1/4]
2. The pre-prints finding the virus in Nov/Dec 2019 in the Wuhan markets (reported breathlessly by the NYT) do not point to the true origin events of the virus.
[2/4]
3. The early seroprevalence studies that found a prevalence of 3%+ in large US metro centers are not so surprising in light of a Sept/Nov 2019 European start date.
Why have the studies @contrarian4data linked not received more attention from the press and scientific communities?
[4/4]
@contrarian4data Update: Some commenters are questioning the specificity of antibody tests in general as a basis for dismissing the French and Italian papers. But the false-postiive rates of antibody tests differ across tests and are generally low. I don't see a specific critique of these tests.
@contrarian4data I'm open to being convinced that the tests used are not fit for purpose, but it will take more than just links to papers that show that some antibody tests have a high false positive rate.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is an important new report out on the lessons we should learn from the covid era by @kerpen, @ScottAtlas_IT, @steve_hanke, and @caseybmulligan. A thread follows:
Lesson #1: Leaders should calm fears, not stoke them.
1/11
Lesson #2: Lockdowns do not work to substantially reduce deaths or stop viral circulation
2/11
Lesson #3: Lockdowns and Social Isolation Had Negative Consequences that Far Outweighed Benefits
3/11
My friend Andrew Lowenthal (@NAffects) once worked at the Harvard Berkman-Klein Center. He now works to expose the inner workings of the censorship industrial complex of which the Berkman Center is a part. The essay he wrote last April is eye-opening. 1/5 brownstone.org/articles/the-c…
Over the years, Andrew watched with dismay as a legitimate scholarly enterprise with a deep commitment to free speech turned against its prior stance in favor of propaganda. 2/5
The censorship complex is vast and incredibly well-funded, encompassing powerful civilian NGOs, media organizations, and defense contractors. 3/5
.@moderna_tx bankrolled the Orwellian "Public Goods Project" aimed at defaming mRNA vax critics. @lhfang reports that the company targeted me for tweeting a preprint by @US_FDA affiliated scientists that showed elevated seizure and myocarditis levels in kids after vax. 1/5
Moderna tagged my tweet for attack because they were afraid that accurately reporting the existence of preprint reporting these signals of vax side effects would make parents hesitant to give the Moderna vax to their kids. 2/5
My tweet now has two tendentious community notes, no doubt written by Modern-funded goons.
It's a badge of honor to be targeted by a dishonest pharmaceutical company that aims to hide accurate reports of the side effects of its products from the public view.
3/5
In Feb '21, former Stanford med school dean Phil Pizzo irresponsibly attacked Dr. @ScottAtlas_IT for advising Pres. Trump in summer '20 against lockdowns & school closures.
His attack in JAMA, that physicians should not "threaten the nation's health" is deeply ironic. 1/5
First and most obviously, lockdowns failed to protect people from dying. Since Jan '20 Sweden has the lowest cumulative age-adjusted all-cause excess deaths in Europe. California was worse than Florida.
It was the lockdowners who threatened the nation's health. 2/5
Second, in Nov. '20, Dean Pizzo organized a campaign to excommunicate Dr. Atlas, culminating in a faculty senate vote to condemn him.
By chilling academic freedom, it made it near impossible for dissidents to speak, harming the nation's health. 3/5 news.stanford.edu/2020/11/20/fac…
In Victoria, former Premier Dan Andrews commissioned a propaganda report dividing Victorians into 5 castes, arrayed based on people's devotion to Dan's restrictions. 1/ archive.is/s0T1T
Caste #1: Strongly support & follow restrictions 2/7
Caste #2: Support and try to follow restrictions 3/7
This report by @shellenberger and @galexybrane on the @Stanford Internet "Observatory" is devastating. Based on documents provided by subpoena, it shows direct Stanford participation in censoring social media speech of Americans & directly contradicts university denials. 1/7
Throughout 2021 and 2022, the @Stanford Internet Observatory team flagged any post -- whether the post was true or false -- that they deemed would diminish enthusiasm for the covid vaccines.
2/7
Among the posts that they requested to be censored include a 100% correct tweet that acquired immunity & age-stratified risk are important in vaccination decisions by @MartinKulldorff, Professor of Medicine @Harvard. 3/7