The Govt just filed it's Response to the Motion to Dismiss & admits the case must be dismissed for violation of the Speedy Trial Act. They just want it to be w/o prejudice to refile it.
They just wanted time to brief whether they can refile the charges, so they were perfectly happy to let him sit in jail for another week. It's despicable.
They argue that no time has run on the clock for the 70 day deadline to take the case to trial (which is different from the 30 days to indict) because that only begins to run at the arraignment.That argument is wrong. They still can't read the Speedy Trial Act statute apparently.
The govt's Response does not seek Denney's immediate release. But it does say it's "appropriate" for both the complaint & the indictment to be dismissed.
It's not "appropriate," you tyrants, it's REQUIRED, unless the defendant waives the violation.
Their argument as to WHY is wrong because the Speedy Trial Act specifically says (in a section they didn't bother to read apparently) that when a charges are dismissed for this violation all the time is counted when they re-file it. But, under Covid rules that is suspended.
So, in normal times they would have about 26 or so days left on the 70 day deadline to bring his case to trial when they refile it. But all covid orders of the DC district court are suspending the deadlines for 70 days, so they will have the full 70 days when they refile.
The suspension of the deadlines applied to the 30 days to bring indictments also, but only at the very beginning of the pandemic. That stopped in mid-July 2020 when the grand juries started operating again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Denney. Under the federal Rules, (Rules 10 and 11), the Arraignment MUST include a plea by the Defendant to the charging document & the Defendant may plead guilty if he wants to. This is basic procedure & law. Not complicated.
The judge's job for a guilty plea is ONLY to make sure there is a factual basis for the plea (the facts you agree happened violate the law) & that the plea is knowing & voluntary. He can only reject a guilty plea for those reasons.
It is the defense lawyer's job to help the client determine if a guilty plea is the strategic choice that he wants to make. The judge has no role in that decision. And the defense DOES NOT have to give the prosecutors or the judge a preview of that strategy choice.
Status: The defense lawyer, @shipwreckedcrew, filed a Motion to Dismiss the COMPLAINT, that the Govt conceded today. The Govt got an Indictment last Monday. There are no motions pending to dismiss THAT, although the Govt agrees to it in their pleading.
The purpose of today's hearing is to formally advise the defendant he has been charged under that Indictment, have him enter a plea and set dates for the case.
Given the doings up until now, however, in this case that will definitely NOT be all that happens at this hearing.
I'm in on the public line. We are waiting for the court to call the case.
Denney Case(Illegally Detained January 6 Defendant)
There's an arraignment in this case today at 3:30.
An arraignment is where a person is formally told what the charges are & dates for next steps in the case are set.
I'll be live tweeting.
I recommend you watch this space.🙃
Denney is currently detained on an illegal indictment - it's in violation of the Speedy Trial Act.
There are several ways to address that. We'll see how it unfolds.
He's entitled to a review his detention regardless. We will likely get a hint of how/when that will happen too.
Since the hearing last week before the magistrate, the case has been assigned to a regular judge, Judge Moss.
That's because the govt got it's "play at the plate" indictment for 1 count just before the hearing on the defense motion for release for lack of a Preliminary Hearing.
Govt programs can always be abused, but just because the public is finding out something now doesn’t mean it’s a secret or nefarious. DOD’s Threat Reduction Agency has been in operation for decades & is openly funded in the budget. Its website. dtra.mil/Home/Article-C…
Here’s its general explanation of its work in Ukraine - a former Soviet satellite.
I’m not saying slavishly believe everything the govt says by any means. But don’t slavishly disbelieve either. And educate yourself on the topic generally before you start forming opinions about claims being made by partisan actors.