2/ Looking at charts, #EVERFORWARD may have slightly deviated from dredged navigation channel into shallower waters after departing Baltimore.
And got stuck.
She's apparently not blocking the navigation channel, but is quite close to it.
3/ The #EverForward's AIS track is... interesting.
People may read it as: she missed a waypoint (didn't make a turn) heading from Craighill Angle into Craighill Channel.
Caveat: accidents = complicated & AIS tracks can be *imprecise* so take all guesses w/big grain of salt!
4/ UPDATE: was going through wind records (not substantial), speed (she kept speed), draught (lot of empty containers), load condition.. when... @mercoglianos with a video!
Takeaway: he also thinks #EverForward missed the turn!
Now, here's the thing...
5/ The #EverForward is aground in a shoal area of ~24 feet of water.
She lists as 42.6 feet of draught (depth below waterline).
Takeaway: VERY stuck. Getting her un-stuck & back into the 51 foot deep Craighill Channel is likely to be a *big production.*
6/ When you talk about ships aground, tides come up.
UPDATE: @Plaid for AI happened faster than I warned.
We are in a historic transformation around AI agents.
Disruption will extend to the core of your privacy.
Companies know the appeal of agentic AI & are working to lock consumers into ecosystems designed to maximize data extraction.
It's not too late, but it might be soon.
But the thing about transformative moments is that new possibilities often open simultaneously with the risks.
We need to build, experiment with & use good private + open AI tools, local models that respect privacy by default & confidential inference that prevents companies from mining the data they process.
Do that & give us a fighting chance for future that respects our freedom, and our boundaries.
Sleep on the challenge of building openly & we relinquish the playing field to the same companies and dynamics that already degrade our autonomy...only faster & everywhere.
2/ What's the deal with @Plaid?
I find people are dimly aware about something involving connecting banking accounts.
I bet you don't know that Plaid helps themselves to mountains of your financial data in exchange for the convenience.
3/ Basically, by providing 'rails' @Plaid has managed to get an absolutely gods-eye-view on peoples financial behavior.
In real time.
That data is available to other companies. And governments.
YIKES: @perplexity_ai is flexing that they have OS-level access to 100M+ Samsung S26s.
Zero mention of:
Privacy
Security
Encryption
What will Perplexity do with this growing stash of personal data from deep inside Samsung phones? What jurisdictions will it live in? Who will it get shared with?
Here's the thing: Android's current security & privacy model involves sandboxing 3rd party apps from each other. TikTok can't read your private notes, for example.
Sandboxing is good & it narrows the attack surface against your private stuff.
But this #Perplexity integration breaks that baseline sandbox model, making a kernel-adjacent data bridge for Perplexity into your personal stuff.
Will users understand the structural shift in privacy?
Meanwhile, the risk of prompt injection & other attacks against an agentic AI that has OS-level access to personal stuff is also real.
Lots of speed, no signs of caution.
2/ Multiple agents & flows each with their own distinct security & privacy issues and levels of OS-level access to private stuff.
I doubt users have the cognitive spare room to parse privacy & security downsides each time they want to ask a question.
NEW: When Kenyan cops arrested activist & presidential candidate @bonifacemwangi they took his devices.
When he got his personal phone back, the password was gone.
We @citizenlab found they'd abused @cellebrite to break into it.
Here's why this abuse matters 1/
2/ Your phone holds the keys to your life, and governments shouldn’t be able to help themselves to the contents just because they don’t like what you are saying.
But everywhere you look, cops are getting phone cracking technology from companies like @cellebrite.
Many abuse it.
3/ @Cellebrite's abuse potential is clear.
Now, Cellebrite says that they have a human rights committee & do due diligence...
Because even Cellebrite knows that if you sell phone cracking tech to security services with bad oversight, you have a problem.
So why are there so many sales to questionable security services?