NEW: AG Garland issued a new memo on #FOIA guidelines for federal agencies. It's the first such memo to be issued since former AG Eric Holder's 2009 FOIA memo, which was supposed to usher in a new era of transparency and open govt but failed
One important point in this memo, which I have complained about loudly since the passage of the 2016 FOIA amendments, is that agencies fail to consider the foreseeable harm standard when withholding docs/info. Garland's memo aims to rectify that
Garland reminds agencies they cannot withhold docs "
based merely on speculative or abstract fears or fears of embarrassment."
Agencies still do this this often. Let's see what happens.
Garland reminds agencies they cannot withhold docs "
based merely on speculative or abstract fears or fears of embarrassment."
Agencies still do this this often. Let's see what happens.
Garland instructs agencies about proactive disclosures. After the 2016 FOIA amendments were passed there was some progress but it was short lived. Many govt agencies, such as NSA, CIA, DNI, DHS and DOD, fail to update their websites and post documents.
Garland cites the massive FOIA backlog, which has delayed the release of docs for years. He says agencies should continue to reduce the backlog but doesn't really say how. DOJ, for example, does not appear to have earmarked any funds for additional staff to reduce its own backlog
The key word here is "encourages." It should be DIRECTED (Iif you know, you know)
Again, very weak language (in my opinion) on how to tackle the FOIA backlogs
With all that said, it's still great to have a new FOIA memo to point to when I sue the government.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW FOIA Files newsletter is out! Check out these crazy emails I obtained! Last May, ODNI took down its #FOIA page and removed hundreds of documents from its FOIA reading room released over the years in response to FOIA requests
At first glance, the disappearance of documents seemed to be connected to a swirling controversy at the agency run by Tulsi Gabbard. On May 5, transparency expert @LaurenLeHarper at the @FreedomofPress received a copy of an intelligence assessment from a unit of the ODNI on Tren de Aragua, a notorious Venezuelan gang.
The assessment undercut Trump’s rationale last year for invoking the Alien Enemies Act to justify deporting alleged gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador without due process. (Harper filed a FOIA request for the assessment on April 25, 2025. Ten days later, ODNI’s FOIA office sent her the partially redacted assessment, a remarkably quick turnaround time for any intelligence agency.)
NEW: Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche is blocking the DEA from releasing an unredacted document from the Epstein files about an investigation involving drug trafficking & money laundering, according to a letter @RonWyden sent to Blanche Tuesday
The document, a 69-page target profile prepared for the DEA by the Department of Justice’s now-defunct Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces, was released in January along with millions of pages of other documents from the Epstein files. Although heavily redacted, it showed that the DEA and the Task Forces, known as OCDETF, investigated Epstein, 12 other people and two businesses in 2015 bloomberg.com/news/features/…
Wyden initially requested the document from the DEA on Feb. 25, after it was first reported by CBS News. In his letter to Blanche, which cited Bloomberg’s recent reporting, Wyden said that “shortly after I requested an unredacted copy of this OCDETF memorandum, DOJ stepped in to prevent DEA from complying with my request.”
The investigation, which grew out of a longstanding probe into organized crime, was conducted by a secretive intelligence and law enforcement unit of the DEA and a transnational crime-fighting task force. It began after an informant told authorities that Epstein was involved in the illicit funding and distribution of so-called club drugs, including ecstasy, ketamine and methamphetamines, according to the people, who asked not to be named to discuss sensitive law enforcement matters.
The individuals named in a document related to the investigation, according to the people, included Epstein’s accountants, attorneys and European women who worked as his assistants or fashion models. The DEA investigation also named two businesses.
NEW: Kathy Ruemmler shared nonpublic details with Jeffrey Epstein about the White House's probe into a 2012 prostitution scandal that engulfed the Secret Service during her tenure as White House counsel, emails show bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
In a dozen or so exchanges that were sent months after Ruemmler left her White House position in 2014, she complained to Epstein about “this secret service crap” and forwarded to him a draft email that contained detailed, nonpublic information about the behind-the-scenes role the White House Counsel’s office played in investigating the 2012 prostitution scandal
Epstein offered advice, as well as what he described as “edits” to the email draft, which Ruemmler indicated she was planning to send to a journalist. “Breathe, smile. You’re free,” he wrote in one message.
NEW: The Epstein files released last week includes hundreds of pages of docs that lays bare the behind-the-scenes chaos at the FBI early last year over the review of the files & questions on what should be redacted related to victims and public figures
🧵 bloomberg.com/news/newslette…
First off, remember when Attorney General Pam Bondi said last March that the FBI turned over a “truckload” of Epstein files after she bungled the rollout of “Phase One” of the documents? Well, Bondi wasn’t being facetious. According to the documents in the Epstein files, the FBI literally rented a U-Haul to transport some of the documents from New York to Washington (others were shipped via FedEx).
One important document is an eight-page timeline that summarizes the FBI’s collection and review of the Epstein files between March and the end of April 2025, a couple months before the DOJ and FBI concluded that “no further disclosure” of the files “would be appropriate or warranted.”
Epstein Files countdown: What should the files reveal? For one, details about this previously undisclosed money laundering investigation conducted by the US Atty in Fla in 2007 & 2008. My @business & I uncovered details of this probe in Oct.
We pubbed our 1st investigative story in our series in Sept, based on 18K previously undisclosed emails @business obtained earlier this year. That story, about the relationship b/w UK Amb to the US Peter Mandelson & Epstein, resulted in Mandelson's firing bloomberg.com/features/2025-…
Our next story focused on Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails shed new light on Maxwell’s partnership w/Epstein & exposed the holes in the story she told Todd Blanche this summer. One detail we revealed: Maxwell & Epstein discussed undergoing a shared fertility procedure. And this bloomberg.com/features/2025-…