And the thing is, it isn't even 5 full months yet and I only update the thread sporadically and yet look at how long it is!
I literally just started threading those stories on a whim, never expecting it to be this regularly updated.

This full scale multi pronged attack on Indian Muslims by the RSS & BJP in recent years is following the 1930s playbook literally play by play.

Without realizing that even if you leave aside morality and just look at it logistically, the strategy makes NO sense in India.
Nazis went after Jews who were 1% of the population. Super easy tiny target with no other world power really caring about them. Their abhorrent goal was logistically not really that tough. And the world ignored the Holocaust for years until Hitler really started invading.
They are using that strategy against Indian Muslims, who form about 15-20% of the population, number more than the entire population of Brazil, are extremely diversely spread out, and have 2 billion other people of the same faith worldwide.

What is the endgame here?
What are these 200 million people, who have generally just gone on with their lives in independent India for 75 years, almost entirely staying out of the whole "global jihad" thing of recent decades, supposed to do in response?

Just bend over and take it?
Even if you lack the simple humanity, the simple morality, to say, hey, maybe we shouldn't vilify groups of people.

Even if you look at it cold blooded like playing a video game.

What is the possible positive endgame of this relentless attack on Indian Muslims?
Do you want to turn India into a 1.5 billion version of Israel and Palestine? Just put Hindus and Muslims in constant armed struggle, while living next to each other? Is that what the BJP wants?

Cos 200+ mn Muslims are way way way more than 6 mn Jews.
Us Hindus already hold the privileges and advantages and powerful positions and everything in India. The Muslims in our country have really no real power except in a couple of states. And even there, Muslims generally have progressive politics.

What more do we want??
What is the realistic possible endgame here, sanghis? You want 200 mn plus people to just disappear? Just sit and take it?

Why are you taking a generally calm and economically growing country and trying to start a full fledged civil war? Who exactly wins that?
I grew up in the brahminical sanghi ecosystem in Pune during babri and bal Thackeray days.

I know all their so called grievances.

None of them make sense whatsoever, from any perspective. All those grievances are as bullshit as this bizarre attack on Muslim women with hijab.
"Muslims can marry four women, no one else can."

Is one top grievance.

Completely nonsensical to get emotional over it, unless you also want to marry 4 women.

Even more nonsensical cos I know more polygamous Hindu men than Muslim men, regardless of the law.
Polygamy is practically non-existent even in the Indian Muslim community, when you look at all 200+ million of them.

For two obvious reasons. Biology. And mathematics.

Unless Muslims magically produce 4 times more girl babies, how can polygamy be more than just a fringe thing?
But I know fellow Hindus, privileged brahmins, who will get ultra sentimental about the civil code and always start their whines with polygamy.

No one actually knows more than 1-2 Muslims who have multiple wives. Most don't know a single such case personally.
"Muslims get special treatment and appeasement as shown by the Shahbano case."

What? What???

How the hell do 200+ mn Muslims in India get any kind of special treatment because the ex husband of one woman benefitted from some political chicanery in the 1980s?

Nonsensical!
"Muslims burst crackers, celebrate if pakistan wins."

It hardly, if ever happens.

Even if it does, what goes of your father? Especially in 2022 when India & Pakistan haven't played each other regularly for almost 15 years.

Just whine & move on.

Genocide is an overreaction!
"Muslims do jihad and terrorism everywhere".

Do they, really? Forget the rest of the world.

Remember all these horrific terrorist attacks in India. Add up all their victims.

I bet more people die on the train tracks of Bombay in a year than have died in all terrorist attacks.
Looking at how many Indian Muslims there are and how many have actually done something violent, again, genocide is an overreaction, no?

What is this supposed crime Muslims have committed exactly that sanghis are so angry at them for?

Existing?
"Muslims seduce our women and make them convert to Islam before marriage"

THE most nonsensical and Freudian of all grievances Hindus have against Muslims.

BJP's own investigation couldn't find a single case of "love jihad". It simply doesn't happen. And can't happen.
Sure, there are millions of Hindu-Muslim couples. Some of them have issues of abuse or coercion, like any community.

But the idea that a Muslim man has any advantage in the romantic realm in India is just outright false and creepily so. Like white US obsession with black men.
A Muslim man in India who "goes after" a Hindu woman is doing so at extremely grave personal risk, especially these days. Only true love would make someone take that risk. Not some random mythical reward for converting a Hindu woman, like incel sanghis fantasize.
"Muslims are converting our people"

They aren't. They just aren't. Not in numbers enough to notice anyway.

This is just a complete lie with no grounding in reality.

Sure, a lot of people in India are converting to different flavors of Christianity. Nothing wrong with it obv.
The number of Hindus converting to Islam in India is negligible to non existent and no different than people in other countries converting to Islam.

People have been converting to Islam for 1500 years.

Genocide seems like an overreaction no when it barely happens in India.
What else is left? Hijab and burqa?

Again, it is one thing to criticize them as practices, from a social reform and gender equality perspective.

But that's not what sanghis are doing, right? Not even pretending to "liberate" Muslim women like US in Afghanistan.
Sanghis are using hijab and burqa as a way to publicly humiliate Muslims and deny them education.

For what benefit exactly? No one can explain. Other than satisfaction at some random uniform rule being upheld. Bizarre cover for bigotry.
What else is even left? At least Nazis were saying Jews had more assets and more power than their percentage of the population. Not that it justifies genocide, but at least it was factual.

Indian Muslims are the exact opposite. They have way less wealth & power than population.
I'm at a complete and utter loss why so many millions of my fellow Indian Hindus seem hell-bent on starting a civil war with Indian Muslims.

I just don't get it. From any angle. I'm witnessing the worst collective self sabotage in history.

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Gaurav Sabnis ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Gaurav Sabnis ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gauravsabnis

Mar 15
A lesson for India from very recent US history on how treating unusual bigotry by the powerful in localized settings as "just politics" can have devastating consequences for the entire polity.

In Dec 2015, a couple in California killed 14 innocent civilians using assault rifles.
Americans kill innocent civilians with guns on a regular basis. What made this attack stand out was that the couple were Muslim immigrants "self-radicalized" and acting as part of the ISIS methodology of independent attacks on soft targets.

It was a "terrorist attack" for sure.
But in the grand scheme of things, in the overall context, while ISIS was still rampant, the tragic incident, while very tragic, was no 9/11, iykwim.

FBI etc were on it already.

But in the grand scheme of things, it was treated as something sad and serious but still, you know.
Read 24 tweets
Mar 15
Oooh one more thread to flesh out bits of lecture script for this prep. Let's see if this analogy works.

What is the difference between Marketing & Propaganda? Forget dictionary definitions. Let's think of analogies, even if a bit flawed. Consider a knife. What is a knife?
A knife is used by billions everyday for everything from feeding people to killing people. I've never used a knife for anything other than cooking, some crafts, and opening those damn unopenable hard plastic cases stuff comes in, you know those (joke break on opening packages).
Similarly, I've never used my marketing knowledge or skills in any way to deceive people or sell them a bad product or take advantage of them.

So think of marketing as a knife in general. Mostly used for good. Overwhelmingly. In every kitchen on the planet, everyday.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 15
Was discussing this recently with a student after class. How Netflix & Prime, 2 cos who very much lean progressive in terms of content production and promotion in the US, have become very "neutral" in India in recent years. Clearly a strategic choice. Kinda understandable.
You have to remember that Netflix, Amazon, are at the end of the day, publicly traded companies mainly making their money in the US.

And the biggest difference between the US & India is that the most lucrative customer segments are all heavily progressive. It's where big $ are.
In India, the most lucrative customer segments lean conservative.

Netflix isn't some social justice warrior in the US. It sees in its data that it makes more sense for it in the short term and the medium term and the long term to be more progressive, more diverse, not less.
Read 16 tweets
Mar 15
"The Birth of a Nationย is not a bad film because it argues for evil. Likeย Riefenstahl'sย Triumph of the Will, it is a great film that argues for evil. To understand how it does so is to learn a great deal about film, and even something about evil." said Roger Ebert once.
The sanghi propaganda films we are getting so far are all badly made films arguing for evil. Has been opportunists trying to jumpstart their careers and make some money in this hate wave.

What I'm saying is, the best made evil films are yet to come from Bollywood. ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜ณ
Btw, D.W.Griffith remained indignantly unapologetic about his film though it revived and influenced the KKK, right down to their most visible stunt. The original Klan didn't burn crosses. The movie showed it. And then the Klan started burning crosses.

But DWG denied being racist
Read 5 tweets
Mar 15
The more I read of the Karnataka hijab verdict, the more I can't even .... wow... the details make it even worse, if you can imagine.
It's like they not just delivered the main verdict but have also planted a lot of sections to be used by lawyers in the future arguing in court on behalf of more such Muslim targeting rules and laws. This is the Nuremberg Laws phase.
Of course this should go to the Supreme Court but I don't have much hope. That this even is a court case shows how deep the rot has set. That it even was a rule shows how deep the rot has set. It is offensive and demoralizing on every level, from Indian to human to educator.
Read 26 tweets
Mar 14
You know, I realized that no show has been in my regular "rewatch after a long day to laugh and unwind" lineup as regularly and as long as #AlwaysSunny! Shows will drop in and out of rotation but #AlwaysSunny is always there in the recently watched since like 2008!
Other frequent rewatch fodder that slips in and out of rotation:
Yes Minister
Fawlty Towers
Parks and Rec
Party Down
Curb Your Enthusiasm
Arrested Development
IT Crowd
Frasier
Cheers
Fresh Prince
Of course, #AlwaysSunny has run for way more seasons than all these shows (tho Frasier and Cheers have more total episodes). And somehow they have aged more gracefully comedically than Larry David who is still stuck in 2010. I will still rewatch Curb. But Sunny holds up better.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(