Was discussing this recently with a student after class. How Netflix & Prime, 2 cos who very much lean progressive in terms of content production and promotion in the US, have become very "neutral" in India in recent years. Clearly a strategic choice. Kinda understandable.
You have to remember that Netflix, Amazon, are at the end of the day, publicly traded companies mainly making their money in the US.
And the biggest difference between the US & India is that the most lucrative customer segments are all heavily progressive. It's where big $ are.
In India, the most lucrative customer segments lean conservative.
Netflix isn't some social justice warrior in the US. It sees in its data that it makes more sense for it in the short term and the medium term and the long term to be more progressive, more diverse, not less.
Another big difference between the US and India is that in the US, the laws and systems and even cultural norms are such that at least in the 21st century, the government can't really do anything to entertainment companies for saying trash about them. At the most, angry tweets.
So Netflix or NBC or Oscars or anyone could greenlight as much Trump bashing GOP bashing harshly critically stuff as they wanted and all Trump could do was hate tweet. He tried a lot to weaponize the FCC but couldn't.
In India though, the government can shut you down in a day!
I'm not saying there isn't any money to be made pushing conservative stuff in the US. It just doesn't make sense for the big corporations. Why the whole Fox News New York Post trump loving thing is very much a personal Murdoch obsession, not a smart Newscorp strategy.
One of the under-appreciated triumphs of the US progressive-liberal movement in the 21st century is to become economically and vocally important enough to "weaponize" large corporations against intolerant conservative policies. Unthinkable in the 20th century.
One of the biggest global brands, Nike, has been on board with #BlackLivesMatter from day 1. Including their committed support of Kaepernick even through Trump years and very loud boycott threats.
Is it because Nike shareholders and management are just so so very liberal?
They might be. I hope they are. But the thing is, Nike really had no choice. Look at their customer base, look at the growing segments, look where the money is, look who is paying the big bucks for a pair of shoes, look at who their biggest celebrity endorsements are.
Also, Nike management, presumably well meaning good people, didn't face any real harsh damaging consequences of taking a position that the President of the United States dumped on every week. Cos Trump really couldn't do anything to them other than tweet angrily.
India is the exact opposite in both dimensions. Why it is pointless to expect any global corporations to seriously stand up to Modi like they stand up to Trump.
The money is with the conservatives and the laws and the culture lean towards censorship, not protecting free speech.
This is a triumph of American progressives. Not just the Democratic party, although it does usually play a reliable vocal role in these issues, but even grassroots organizers.
In just one generation, they changed the culture enough to make bigotry bad for shareholders.
Been thinking a lot of these issues since this course got approved and listed and I have to teach it in just 5 months and I have to build everything from scratch!
So y'all gonna see a lot of threads where I test out my "scripts" hehe.
Shareholders care about profit. Make it unprofitable to be a bigot and the suits have no option but to change into shorts and t-shirts.
Until 20 years ago, few big companies took visibly political positions. Especially on social issues. Now most do.
Cos $ above all.
Of course, in India, suits changing into shorts is a metaphor that works in the other direction 🙄
This is another thing. Much like with all things fascist, reality is opposite to the propaganda. Doing business in India, never easy, has actually gotten way less easier in the 8 Modi years. There are newer ways for the govt to punish or kill businesses.
A lesson for India from very recent US history on how treating unusual bigotry by the powerful in localized settings as "just politics" can have devastating consequences for the entire polity.
In Dec 2015, a couple in California killed 14 innocent civilians using assault rifles.
Americans kill innocent civilians with guns on a regular basis. What made this attack stand out was that the couple were Muslim immigrants "self-radicalized" and acting as part of the ISIS methodology of independent attacks on soft targets.
It was a "terrorist attack" for sure.
But in the grand scheme of things, in the overall context, while ISIS was still rampant, the tragic incident, while very tragic, was no 9/11, iykwim.
FBI etc were on it already.
But in the grand scheme of things, it was treated as something sad and serious but still, you know.
Oooh one more thread to flesh out bits of lecture script for this prep. Let's see if this analogy works.
What is the difference between Marketing & Propaganda? Forget dictionary definitions. Let's think of analogies, even if a bit flawed. Consider a knife. What is a knife?
A knife is used by billions everyday for everything from feeding people to killing people. I've never used a knife for anything other than cooking, some crafts, and opening those damn unopenable hard plastic cases stuff comes in, you know those (joke break on opening packages).
Similarly, I've never used my marketing knowledge or skills in any way to deceive people or sell them a bad product or take advantage of them.
So think of marketing as a knife in general. Mostly used for good. Overwhelmingly. In every kitchen on the planet, everyday.
"The Birth of a Nation is not a bad film because it argues for evil. Like Riefenstahl's Triumph of the Will, it is a great film that argues for evil. To understand how it does so is to learn a great deal about film, and even something about evil." said Roger Ebert once.
The sanghi propaganda films we are getting so far are all badly made films arguing for evil. Has been opportunists trying to jumpstart their careers and make some money in this hate wave.
What I'm saying is, the best made evil films are yet to come from Bollywood. 😳😳
Btw, D.W.Griffith remained indignantly unapologetic about his film though it revived and influenced the KKK, right down to their most visible stunt. The original Klan didn't burn crosses. The movie showed it. And then the Klan started burning crosses.
The more I read of the Karnataka hijab verdict, the more I can't even .... wow... the details make it even worse, if you can imagine.
It's like they not just delivered the main verdict but have also planted a lot of sections to be used by lawyers in the future arguing in court on behalf of more such Muslim targeting rules and laws. This is the Nuremberg Laws phase.
Of course this should go to the Supreme Court but I don't have much hope. That this even is a court case shows how deep the rot has set. That it even was a rule shows how deep the rot has set. It is offensive and demoralizing on every level, from Indian to human to educator.
You know, I realized that no show has been in my regular "rewatch after a long day to laugh and unwind" lineup as regularly and as long as #AlwaysSunny! Shows will drop in and out of rotation but #AlwaysSunny is always there in the recently watched since like 2008!
Other frequent rewatch fodder that slips in and out of rotation:
Yes Minister
Fawlty Towers
Parks and Rec
Party Down
Curb Your Enthusiasm
Arrested Development
IT Crowd
Frasier
Cheers
Fresh Prince
Of course, #AlwaysSunny has run for way more seasons than all these shows (tho Frasier and Cheers have more total episodes). And somehow they have aged more gracefully comedically than Larry David who is still stuck in 2010. I will still rewatch Curb. But Sunny holds up better.