lol, I dunno. I can and have copped to the fact that it didn't need to be said, but these hypotheticals are a reach. Cis men are generally very hesitant to publicly claim attractions to transgender women; so this scenario wouldn't likely happen.
Abstractly, I can see the point you're making, but the most I said was we sexted and said he was "underwhelming", but only after his comment about me being obsessed with white cock in the way a raceplayer would be.
(which is really funny since my penis preference is brown and uncut and I find myself less attracted to white men the older I get tbh)
If the situations were reversed, I'd struggle to feel like I was exposed/secrets told etc, but I can see how other women would. I'm just pretty open about sex so I don't carry a lot of shame around it so it wouldn't phase me. My audience knows i fuck.
And also the situations wouldn't be reversed because I generally hold that people are free to criticize me; even the people I generally like. I wouldn't enter into someone's DMs to talk about their indirect tweets about me and then kinda threaten them; especially if we've sexted.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Outside of this conversation, this fascinates me and I kinda wanna talk about it.
Every way i spoke about his posts, I tried to separate him as a person from the argument being made. So I suppose in my view, that made me actually debating with him not the point.
Like, I was already publicly saying that his comments weren't the end of the world, that JK Rowling is terrible, but focused it on whether or not invoking misogyny was "helpful" to trans women. Asking them specifically.
So when he came into my DMs it felt like he was trying to defend himself, and his usage of ironic misogyny, but that really didn't align with what I was personally saying, which wasn't about him personally.
A lot of the people currently speaking about the incident between Vaush and I are doing this really strange thing where they speak out of order about what actually happened in order to misrepresent the truth of things and it's very hard for me not to want to talk about that.
I have pretty consistently said on my page that there are things I didn't need to do, but that I don't particularly regret them and I respect if people think i'm a bad person for doing those things, but what isn't understood is I generally don't act like that without reason.
Firstly I think that most of you trying to make sense of this need to understand that this has become a larger issue than it ever needed to be to begin with. I had a conversation about Vaush's IDEAS on my page while discouraging people being biased against him.
Yeah, but I think that people are missing that I only said that after he said on stream that I was obsessed with white cock.Until then, all it said was that we had sexted. And I actually deleted that tweet because I wasn't currently watching the stream, I was just being told that
I will, however agree that it was absolutely unnecessary for me to say and also actually quite shitty. I suppose what I am predominantly confused by hoe there are different ways in which our actions are measured.
I partially understand why that is given how we both tend to approach things. You expect for him to be more crass, and be more proper. So when I say something like that, people are disappointed in me. But I am, at my heart a crass person.
This part of the conversation is very fascinating to me even beyond this particular conversation. I really would like to have a larger conversation about how it's "abusive" to publicly acknowledge a "sexual relationship" with someone. I'd really need more of an explanation.
I never leaked our sexts. I leaked our DMs after he kept going on about me on his page and I said several times I didn't want to do that, but it's very annoying having people doubt you and then having said person deny their actions.
Was Stormi Daniels "abusive" for saying she had sex with Trump? I'm curious about this logic, genuinely.
Okay so I'm gonna explain something because this is actually pretty cyclical.
My reaction to Vaush saying I'm obsessed with him is the same exact reaction that I have to people who want me to comment on each and every single thing ContraPoints has ever said/done.
I have this very innate annoyance to this idea that because I make lefty things on the internet that I must engage with all of these other creators. It's one of my biggest pet peeves and I hate the conclusions often made when creators don't interact with other lefty folks.
I've always felt like I'm kinda on my own island when it comes to content. I've always been overtly left, but Im far more personal than most of the creators I tend to be associated with. I also have messier, less black and white politics than they do