On the issue of whether our voting systems are secure, here’s a sworn declaration of Dr Halderman signed last August, summarizing findings found in his detailed expert report kept under seal by the federal court in Atlanta. Bottom line is that Dr H believes there are serious
vulnerabilities that must be addressed before Dominion’s voting machine systems can be used in another election.
I can’t attach the whole thing, but Halderman says the machines contain “multiple severe security flaws” that make them vulnerable to locally or remotely installed malware. Such malware could both alter votes and subvert “all the procedural safeguards practiced by the state” ..
… “including acceptance testing, hash validation, logic and accuracy testing, external firmware validation and RISK LIMITING AUDITS.” (Emphasis mine). Halderman says he has created some “proof of concept malware” to demonstrate his findings. Nevertheless, he goes on, the State
of GA has done nothing to secure the machines. In response to the State’s experts, he further explains that poll workers and election officials would be unlikely to spot any problem if the machines were infected with malware. The last I checked his full 25,000 word report remains
…under seal, presumably because the judge does not want Dr H’s detailed findings on how to steal an election in GA to get into the hands of bad actors.
Paraphrasing Turkey, for a change (at long last), the NYT and other media did not get their latest scoop by following Biden to the ice cream parlor.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting thread to read with your morning coffee. Russian planes apparently carrying elites left Moscow heading to different places with transponders on. All ended up landing at major airports and didn’t head to the bunkers in the Urals. Had the Russian plane tracking crowd
worried for awhile. Still no explanation as to what’s going on. Lot of speculation, including Putin may be further insulating himself against a coup. Read all the way down:
James OKeefe and Project Veritas have a whistleblower inside the FBI. They’ve released body cam footage of the FBI raid on a PV journalist last November looking for Ashley Biden’s diary. It’s interesting- but even more interesting is that an insider leaked it. More’s coming.
The issue is a journalist First Amendment rights and the right to be free from law enforcement intimidation when the powers that be don’t light what you’re publishing.
The raid mirrored tactics used against Roger Stone and Paul Manafort . We’re not talking about simple execution of AA simple search warrant. It’s the full force of the state, wearing body armor and acting like a swat assault team, brought down on a journalist who had the gall to
Sussmann’s legal team filed a reply to Durham’s opposition to Sussmann’s motion to dismiss on the basis of lack of materiality. Sussmann sticks to the premise underlying their motion. They contend that Sussmann was the deliverer of a tip to the FBI, which triggered a binary
decision to be made by the FBI: 1) open up an investigation of the tip or 2) decide to tip isn’t strong enough to justify an investigation, so do nothing. Under this logic, Sussmann argues, only a false statement in the tip itself can be material. Here’s the reply brief:
The findings are disturbing . Bottom line the statistical sampling experts found serious problems with , on average, 8% of all voters, with a low of 5% and high of 11%. These problems include 1) non-existent voters on the rolls who are shown as having voted in the last election;
2) real voters on the rolls who claim to have voted but whose votes were not recorded; 3) voters on the rolls with a fictional address; and 4) unexplained changes to the voting rolls database. If this canvass is accurate, it shows that thousands of voters were disenfranchised
@ggreenwald calls out Fox News reporter Jennifer Griffin for reading Pentagon talking points and then declaring, This talk about dangerous level 3 bio research labs in Ukraine is just Russian propaganda- Nothing to see here folks:
I would add that less than one hour earlier, Tucker Carlson covered the same story, but without the Pentagon talking pints. He put on the screen some evidence- a news clipping from 2010 touting the opening of a new bio research lad in Odessa, funded by the DOD. That clip and many
other DOD web pages discussing level 3 bio labs around Ukraine, as legacy facilities from Soviet Union bio weapons research labs, have been removed from the internet.
Now watching Hannity who has Jennifer Grinning on. She’s reading from the Pentagon’s talking points, claiming that the labs are left over from the old Soviet Union (31 years ago) and the mission is to safely dispose of bio weapons and other pathogens from that era. Thirty years?
Jennifer squarely contrasts with what was reported by Tucker Carlson about a lab in Odessa that was built with US dollars in 2010- not 30 years ago. So which Fox News should we believe? Well, Tucker had news clips touting the opening of the Odessa lab. Jennifer just had Pentagon
talking points. Those govt talking points raise more questions. Why are they lying?