30 Nov 2021: Attacks Boris Johnson's Brexit deal.
8 Dec 2021: Says Boris Johnson's deal is much much better than remaining in the EU.
30 Dec 2021: Attacks Boris Johnson's deal.
17 Mar 2022: Going to court to prove Boris Johnson's deal's worse than remaining in the EU
To be fair to Ben, a deep perusal of his past tweets suggests that he is broadly right about the lousiness of Boris Johnson's deal, and he accurately identifies its flaws.
But his fundamental starting point that "no-deal" is the most desirable of all outcomes is bonkers.
He also exhibits a lot of the classic hard-Brexiter tropes, for example "The EU needs us a hell of a lot more than we need them".
Events have shown this to be the arrant nonsense those who understood the real power dynamics at play always said it was.
And he doesn't seem to understand that importers pay tariffs (another very common Brexiter misconception).
He painted the opportunity to slap tariffs on imports from the EU as a cash cow. Whereas in reality UK consumers would pay more as a result. 12ft.io/proxy?q=https%…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Flo's parents are hoping to sponsor Sergei but despite being in close contact with the UK sponsor, the Ukrainian refugee spent over five hours filling in forms and has had to pay to get documents translated into English."
For one thing, it uses a much more limited definition of "immediate family", the same one that was widely derided when it applied to the family visa scheme, and which the Home Office very grudgingly expanded. No such expansion here, though.
And then there's the desperately insulting suggestion that the would-be sponsor (who almost certainly doesn't know the refugee, and vice versa) will somehow be able to hand-hold them through the application process from thousands of miles away...
It's instructive to look at COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths.
Here's the graph for England. Note that each dataset is plotted on a different scale axis.
You can see that new admissions lag deaths by 2-3 weeks. You can also see the effect of the vaccine, and Omicron.
Hospitalisations are now rising again, sharply.
Therefore the whole of the past history of the vaccine tells us that deaths will too, sadly. Nothing suggests that the virus has suddenly become innocuous.
NOTES
- The underlying data comes from the coronavirus dashboard. All I did was sum it over 7-day periods, and plot it on a graph
- The interpretation is mine alone. You may have your own views.
"Telegraph to continue publishing Russian propaganda supplement"
That was in 2014. It's now wiped all traces of it off the Telegraph website, and got it deindexed from the Internet Archive to make very, very sure nobody will find issues of it again... theguardian.com/media/greensla…
Wonder if the £350 will turn out psychologically counterproductive? It may set people along the path of thinking about the real cost (and how much £350 is short of that) who otherwise would have borne it without a grumble. Plus cements ongoing Tory monitoring into the process.
It likely that we are much more angry about the UK visa situation for Ukrainian refugees than Ukrainians are (except the ones directly affected, of course).
Why?
- Only about 1% applied to come to the UK
- Our military and humanitarian aid is much appreciated
- Distracted by war
But even if the Ukrainians haven't noticed, other European governments and media certainly have.
So the message has spread that we are a harsh, unwelcoming place even at a time of maximum need.
The British public stand ready to be generous.
They're being stymied by the Tories.
Remember, Brexit voters represent just 37% of registered voters, and only a subset of Brexit voters will have had immigration as their top concern.
So we are making the lives of Ukrainian refugees hell and sinking our international reputation further to please a small minority.