Mark Joseph Stern claims my report on Yale Law "distorts reality." He claims that the panel "remained audible" as the protesters chanted outside, and that the police—while present—were not called to escort panelists out of the building.
Stern writes: "It’s debatable this noise made it 'difficult to hear the panel." But in the first 18 minutes of the audio, the panelists are repeatedly drowned out. One chant of "protect trans kids" goes on for several minutes, making it very hard to hear the panelists.
To refute the claim that the panel was difficult to hear, Stern posts a video that is all of 13 seconds, comes from a relatively quiet moment during the protest, and is taken by an audience member in the front row of a large classroom, extremely close to the panelists.
Next, Stern credulously repeats Yale Law School’s claim that the police were not there to escort panelists out of the building. But that’s precisely what the police say they are doing in the audio we obtained: “We have cops lined up to let you guys go out," an officer says.
He continues: "There’s a big crowd out there. We have a vehicle outside.” The cop suggests the panelists take the vehicle, because “if not, you’re going to have people following you." Panelists and members of the Federalist Society can then be heard thanking the police.
Kristen Waggoner, the main target of the protest, independently confirmed that the police escorted her and her co-panelist to a patrol car, which then drove them to lunch.
So the audio indicates that the panel did not, in fact, "remain audible" the entire time; it was inaudible, or close to it, for significant periods. The audio also indicates—and on-record sourcing confirms—that the police were there to escort the panelists out of the building.
I would also note that Stern reached out to the Beacon for comment before he published his article. We told him that claim about the police was sourced in the original story—in which we said that three members of fedsoc were told Gerken called the police. Stern omitted this fact.
Lastly, Stern derides "other conservative outlets" for endorsing my version of events. That's quite the accusation to throw at @DavidLat, who, based on his own sources, concluded that my story was "far more accurate" than the Yale Daily News's, which Stern credulously hyperlinks.
NEW: More than 100 students at Yale Law School attempted to shout down a bipartisan panel on civil liberties, intimidating attendees and causing so much chaos that police were eventually called to escort panelists out of the building.
The March 10 panel, which was hosted by the Yale Federalist Society, featured Monica Miller of the progressive American Humanist Association and Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a conservative nonprofit that promotes religious liberty.
Both groups had taken the same side in a 2021 Supreme Court case involving legal remedies for First Amendment violations. The purpose of the panel was to illustrate that a liberal atheist and a conservative Christian could find common ground on free speech issues.
One petition said Shapiro's tweets were "antithetical to Georgetown Law's commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion."
The dean of Georgetown Law said they were "antithetical to the work that we do here every day to build inclusion, belonging, and respect for diversity."
Another petition, from Georgetown's Black Law Students Association, criticized the dean for sending only "a barebones email" in the wake of Shapiro's "offensive statements," and for offering "no apology or action plan."
“Race triage in a hospital setting is a reminder that ‘symbolic’ ideas, however abstract or fantastical, can extend their reach and impact well outside of the rarefied halls of elite universities.”
Glad to see @shadihamid covering this in the Atlantic.
“The rationing rules in New York and elsewhere are not the product of anything resembling conventional political persuasion. No party would support—certainly not openly—the essentialization and instrumentalization of race in medicine.”
“Few are willing to defend policies such as these on the merits, because what exactly would they say? Tellingly, these controversies have received limited coverage from mainstream outlets.”
BREAKING: Today, Georgetown Law condemned one of its own law professors for his "appalling" criticism of President Joe Biden's pledge to nominate a black woman to the Supreme Court.
There are signs that the school is gearing up to fire him. 🧵
In an email to the entire law school, William Treanor, the dean of the law school, said Ilya Shapiro's comments regarding Biden's pledge to base his nomination decision on race were "at odds with everything" the law school stands for.
Shapiro, the executive director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution, wrote on social media on Wednesday that Biden was not going to pick the most qualified person for the Supreme Court because he pledged to pick a black woman.
It was 9:30 on a Saturday night, and the library was deserted. With no one within at least 150 feet of him, a Yale senior decided to relax with a movie—and without a mask.
It got him reported to the school’s COVID hotline.
According to the Yale senior, another student walked into the library and demanded he mask up. Since he didn’t have one on him, the senior said he would leave. As he was gathering his belongings, the other student pulled out her phone and began filming him.
When he asked for her name, she raised her middle finger and stormed off. Two days later, he received a notice from the Yale administration: he'd been reported for violating the "Community Compact," a set of rules put in place to "promote the health and safety of all" Yalies.