Counter thread:
This is precisely the sort of out-of-context patristic citation/misrepresentation that drives me up the wall with Romanists, but also with Protestants.
Augustine is not writing contra the cult of the saints, unless you want to accuse him of being two-faced.
Augustine is, rightly, reserving divine worship for God alone.
The veneration of the saints is not divine worship in Augustine’s eyes.
Augustine makes clear the distinction in Sermon 273, see attached images.
This is standard stuff; saints aren’t worshipped as gods. ImageImage
To further drive home the point, here’s Augustine in his Treatise Against Faustus 20.21, where he specifies that Christians honour the saints but do not give them divine worship.
You’ll note that for Augustine the honour given to the saints is not merely celebrating their memory. Image
Here’s Augustine in Sermon 335 on a feast of unnamed martyrs, where talks about the devotion of the faithful to the martyrs, and how it is not worship.
The second image is of sermon 360, where he tells us that a Christian emperor honours Peter at his tomb in Rome. ImageImage
Here’s what he says in sermon 317 and in his 212th letter.
In the latter, he commends two women who were carrying relics with them. ImageImage
In his Confessions (5.8.15) he speaks about his mother who spent a night at the shrine of Cyprian.
This is a well-known practice in the cult of the saints. Image
Here he is in sermon 302 on Saint Laurence, speaking about the martyr’s merits relevant to the requests of those praying at his shrine. Image
Sermon 316 on St Stephen, where Augustine specifically talks about miracles wrought by his relics, and explicitly prays to/invokes both Stephen and the apostle Paul: ImageImage
Augustine in his City of God (22.8) relating a story of a man who prayed to 20 martyrs at a local shrine, and sermon 293 on John the Baptist. ImageImage
I could give many more examples, but this would be tedious and, I think, unnecessary.
The point I’m trying to make is simple; it’s be honest with the historical data, and not try to construct narratives that ignore vast portions of it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with naD 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿✝️

naD 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿✝️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PatrologyVotary

Mar 23
Counter thread:
@potamopotos’ thread has already been sufficiently refuted by what I said in my original response.
The cult of the saints involves honours offered to the saints.
That which @potamopotos limits this to, simply remembering those before us, is not what Augustine did.
The entire premise of my response was precisely the opposite of making Augustine war against himself, which is what you do if you claim that he rejected the cult of the saints.
A cultus *properly so called* (that is, giving divine worship) for saints is rejected, as the quotes…
…I gave demonstrated.
At the same time, Augustine’s writings must be taken as a whole, not quoted selectively to make him say what we want him to.
Augustine rejects the idea of giving divine worship to saints.
If this is what you mean by the cult of the saints, then...
Read 25 tweets
Mar 23
Thread:

One of the best examples I know, of how ecclesiastical tradition can be demonstrated to err, is that of the “2nd Cephas.”
As is well known Simon son of Jonah was renamed Cephas (Peter) by Jesus.
Over time, the early church began to feel uneasy about the fact that…
…two apostles, Peter and Paul, were at conflict with one another so openly and strongly, as recorded in the New Testament.
Most often, this was dealt with by fanciful (and false) interpretations of scripture, such as the popular one whereby Peter wasn’t *really* disagreeing…
…with Paul, he was only pretending to, for the sake of instruction.
Another less well-known way to absolve the apostles of this imperfection is spectacular; the early church invented another Cephas.
This imaginary man, they supposed, was one of the Seventy Disciples/Apostles.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(