We reported the Russian ambassador introduced an oligarch to Arron Banks the day before he launched LeaveEU. He offered him 2 investment opportunities:
1/ A deal to consolidate 6 gold mines.
2/ An opportunity to invest in the privatisation of a state-owned diamond firm, Alrosa
We could see from publicly available info that the gold deal & privatisation of Alrosa went ahead in the weeks after the Brexit vote.
There was no evidence to suggest Arron Banks or any of his associates participated in either of these deals.
We have always made this clear.
But then @nytimes got the emails. And spotted something we hadn’t.
@ddknyt & @AllMattNYT reported that a fund management company founded by Arron Banks’s business partner & LeaveEU donor, Jim Mellon, *did* participate in Russia’s privatisation of Alrosa
The @nytimes report enabled @peterjukes & I to then report that Jim Mellon was actually cc-ed on the emails between Arron Banks & the Russian oligarch. And Banks tells him:
“I’ve chatted to Jim Mellon who is my partner in the bank..Jim knows the Russian ambassador as well!”
“Three weeks after 2016 Brexit vote, the Russian govt sold the Alrosa stake…at a discount to the market price.
“Mr Mellon’s fund management company, Charlemagne Capital, was among a restricted number of investors who was allowed to participate.”
This is how we carefully reported it in @ObserverUK.
We noted Alrosa is run by the son of one of Putin’s closest advisors.
And Mellon’s detailed response: Charlemagne had previously invested in Alrosa, he owned 19% of firm, was no longer a director & had no knowledge of deal
Then the legal letters began. Libel campaigner @skcoughtrie wants editors & journalists to publish these letters.
So, here is is. This was sent pre-publication: ‘our client’s primary position [is] that no article should be published.’
Then more legal letters arrived. Every outlet that reported on Jim Mellon got one. This @nymag report by @jonathanchait originally included Jim Mellon. And now it doesn’t.
Jim Mellon’s lawyers then pushed @nytimes to “correct” its article.
The @nytimes declined. Instead, it added the information as an update carefully noting that this was provided *after* publication.
This is key. And it’s much harder to do in Britain because of our libel laws
And then, they came for me. I have been tweeting about Trump-Brexit-Russia since Feb 2017.
I have published more material on this subject from this Twitter account than any news outlet.
I do this because there’s literally been no other choice. But it carries significant risk.
For the purposes of UK libel law, I am treated as a publisher. I bear the same risks as a news org just without an editor, legal team or insurance.
In 2018, I engaged in lengthy correspondence with Jim Mellon’s lawyers regarding tweets I wrote about @nytimes & @nymag articles
Remember, this important reporting by @nytimes was never carried by BBC or other major UK outlets.
And, sitting here, writing this thread on a Sunday morning, one of many 100s threads since Feb 2017, is to conduct imaginary conversations with libel lawyers in my head as I go.
And I know that Dominic Crossley, Jim Mellon's libel lawyer, will be reading these tweets. But the silence of the UK media establishment on the FarageVerse at this moment in time blows my tiny mind.
Jim Mellon says he had no knowledge of Charlemagne Capital’s involvement in the Alrosa deal. And I’m happy to reiterate that - again - here. But this was one of the tweets which his lawyers sent me multiple letters about. A tweet which doesn’t even mention him. Beyond absurd.
I'm not allowed to write the words "Arron Banks" in @ObserverUK currently. Or even "Nigel Farage". The silencing is real. I don't know what @BBC's excuse is, though. Maybe @amolrajan does?
Instead, here's the great @NickCohen4 sneaking him in today:
Very proud to have been part of this tonight. @frontlineclub projected the Ukrainian flag onto the Russian embassy in London tonight to support the work of independent journalists reporting from Ukraine 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
All journalists reporting from Ukraine are doing vital work. Without them, Putin’s lies will win. But freelance journalists do this work without the support of a news organisation. And whole purpose of @frontlineclub is to try & keep them safe.
I didn’t get a clear shot but no-one understands this better than @waadalkateab. She’s the amazing filmmaker who documented destruction of her city, Aleppo. ‘It’s not a war,’ she said ‘It’s mass murder.’ Standing here with picture of killed journalist, Oleksandra Kushynova
Britain has a Russia problem. And his name is Nigel Farage.
Today, Ofcom finally banned RT. 8 long years after Russia illegally invaded Crimea.
But this is their man. RT - whose editor described it as a "weapon" of the Russian state - is what made Farage into who is today. 1/
RT is not just a TV channel. It's at centre of a whole ecosystem of Kremlin propaganda. Clips uploaded to YouTube were laced between mesmerising videos of tsunamis & tornadoes.
It was clickbait wizardry.
As ex-YouTuber @gchaslot told me no-one milked YouTube's algo like RT. 2/
And who was RT's favourite man in the West?
This man. It's not just that Farage was paid by RT - the Russian state - for appearances over years. Though he was.
It's that RT - the biggest news channel on YouTube - made him a star. 3/
I don’t think the people who have cheerleaded this man, who have repeated his talking points & helped his political objectives should have a way back from this.
He’s just called for a ‘self-purification’ of Russia. We know where we’ve heard that before.
Maybe there’s a way back from it. But it’s not this. Farage voted in favour of Kremlin’s foreign policy for years. This claim about ‘Russia hoax’ is actually obscene.
It’s Putin’s line. Delivered with less than zero evidence. From a man who actually appears in Mueller Report
Fox TV’s Tucker Carlson is Putin’s boy. Russian TV has actually been commanded to show more Carlson. And these clips from Dec 2016 with Farage - when the details of Russian hacking op first began to emerge - show how clearly in lockstep they’ve been.
Here’s what most people don’t know. Arron Banks didn’t just sue me for defamation. He sued the Electoral Commission. It’s a taxpayer-funded body, a libel trial costs circa £2m & it settled. Part of that settlement involved deleting info about the NCA referral from the internet
What’s ironic is that if Banks had sued @guardian it would have settled too. Everyone settles. Harper Collins fought but settled. Only reason I didn’t is because 30,000 people - 30,000! - crowdfunded me. And when Banks conflicted out my lawyer, I was too broken to deal with it
Compare & contrast.
This is what’s on the internet now: a dead link to a blank page
And here’s what @ElectoralCommUK said re NCA before it was silenced by a SLAPP suit:
‘We are concerned about the apparent weakness in the law..which allows overseas funds into UK politics’