Q: In the book "Implementing DDD" you say to do code reviews with domain experts. Really? How?
A: First, I didn't say that.
The point is that business experts can understand tests if the tests follow the language that the experts helped develop and if the tests present 1/5
A: First, I didn't say that.
The point is that business experts can understand tests if the tests follow the language that the experts helped develop and if the tests present 1/5
realistic scenarios with realistic data/information.
I don't know how many times I have seen tests with completely bogus scenarios and data. For example, George Washington and Abraham Lincoln have no value-add as personas in most modern contexts. 2/5
I don't know how many times I have seen tests with completely bogus scenarios and data. For example, George Washington and Abraham Lincoln have no value-add as personas in most modern contexts. 2/5
Instead such example data disrupts experts' ability to think through scenarios because the examples are ridiculously unbelievable.
I have written test data generators that randomly produce a range of realistic valid data associated with subjects that, eg, work around HIPAA 3/5
I have written test data generators that randomly produce a range of realistic valid data associated with subjects that, eg, work around HIPAA 3/5
and other privacy restrictions that render production data unusable.
Executives have said: "Wow, that's awesome. Thanks for making us look really smart to our customers."
You would benefit from thinking in "acceptance tests" using the Specification by Example style 4/5
Executives have said: "Wow, that's awesome. Thanks for making us look really smart to our customers."
You would benefit from thinking in "acceptance tests" using the Specification by Example style 4/5
with Given-When-Then. If you look at my "DDD Distilled" book I discussed SbE and even how to simulate GWT using a unit test framework. See Chapter 2. 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
