Good morning from Europe, where China Radio International (Chinese state media) — in Poland — in Polish — has a frontpage with no refugees, no war, but a headline reading: "If America really cares about Ukrainians, it should provide peace, not weapons."
Further down the frontpage of Chinese state media's website in Polish, Beijing wants the people of Poland to know that "Polish dairy products are increasingly welcomed by Chinese consumers." There is no other mention of Ukraine beyond the slam against the US.
Let's go to CGTN Français — Chinese state media's French language outlet for people in France. There is no coverage of war in Ukraine on the frontpage, although there is an article about "dark US biolabs in Ukraine."
How about Italy? Let's look at China Radio International's (Chinese state media) frontpage in Italian. To the people of Italy: There is no war in Ukraine. However, Beijing is donating money for a humanitarian crisis there, but doesn't explain what caused this mystery crisis.
Magyar CRI (China Radio International)! What is Chinese state media saying to Hungarians in their language? On its FB page, interestingly, it acknowledges some kind of conflict in Ukraine. But more than anything, it wants you to look at this bird among cherry blossoms in Japan:
On to Greece. What is Chinese state media saying in Greek to the people there? On the frontpage there is some "issue" in Ukraine. There is a "situation." But there are no photos of destruction, refugees, and no mention that Russia is the cause of the war. "War" is not used.
Moving to Romania! Chinese state media has a Romanian-language website. To the people of Romania, Beijing wants you to know there is no war in Ukraine. In fact, there's a headline that reads, "China will cooperate economically and commercially with Russia."
Chinese state media in Germany, auf Deutsch. You wouldn't know there's a war in Ukraine, there is no Russian invasion, but the frontpage wants Germans to know that, "Like all Chinese women, Muslim women benefit from the broad acceptance of equality."
CGTN en español! Chinese state media serves the Spanish-speaking world and it wants you to know that Beijing is neutral. Also, there are food shortages in western Ukraine due to "a number of factors." There are no photos of the war or refugees on the frontpage.
Chinese state media's (China Radio International) website for those in Czechia, in the Czech language, has no images of the war in Ukraine, no images of refugees, and a headline reading, "As for America, indeed, for the good of the Ukrainians, it should strive for peace."
Chinese state media also has a website in Portuguese, and China Radio International Português's Facebook page actually has almost a million followers. It shares no images of war in Ukraine but has a headline saying the "US must abandon Cold War thinking on Ukraine issue."
I will end by looking at Chinese state media's dedicated outlet in the Ukrainian language. To the people of Ukraine, the frontpage shows no war, no death, no refugees. No Russian aggression. But Beijing wants you to know today is World Water Day.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇷🇺's Lavrov says that Putin would not refuse to meet Zelensky but it depends. ➡️ Russia first demanded talks in Minsk, rejected 🇺🇦's proposal to meet in Istanbul. Now open in theory to a Putin-Zelensky meeting, implicit there is they are equal heads of state. Quite the climbdown.
On the downside: 🇷🇺's Lavrov continues the messaging that this is all about the 🇺🇸 meddling, ignoring 🇺🇦's ability as a sovereign country to have its own agency. Russian message aligns with the same thing we're seeing 🇨🇳 say. No country has any agency, every country is a tool.
🇷🇺's Lavrov also takes issue that oil and gas trade have been wielded like weapons, conveniently forgetting the actual Russian weapons murdering Ukrainian civilians including babies.
The prevailing belief from experts the last few weeks is that Putin wouldn't try something like this. Not a criticism of expertise but it's a reminder that rational people analyzing things do not take into account enough the possibility that some autocrats are crazy.
I see the same approach to analyzing Xi Jinping. There is an assumption he is rational, this is why he wouldn't do X or Y. But what if hubris, being surrounded by yes men, and power make men nuts? Not enough credence is given to this possibility in foreign policy.
Erdoğan is another example. He's chosen to ignore all his economists and run economic policy in his country (strong "I alone can fix it" energy here), leading to a collapse of the lira and debilitating inflation in Turkey. This was not rational, and yet he did it anyway.
Chinese Olympian Eileen Gu says she's happy Peng Shuai is "out there doing her thing again." Except Peng literally announced the opposite: her retirement — and did so likely under duress. Gu has sought to avoid politics, but her comments align with Beijing's.
Eileen Gu is an amazing athlete who won gold with that amazing left double 1620. She also towed the Party line on Peng Shuai. In many ways we should not expect such young athletes to comment on human rights. But an 18-year-old knows what a rape accusation is and Gu gaslit Peng.
A lot of Olympic athletes switch country representation. This happens. The reason why Eileen Gu is getting so much attention is because she decided to rep a country where we've had a steady stream of Uyghurs the last few years escape and talk about the horrors of detention camps.
My piece: Is it time to consider a word other than "authoritarian" to describe China? "Fascism: a surveillance state with a strongman invoking racism, nationalism and traditional family values at home, while building up a military for expansion abroad." washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
The state has also become fixated on machismo, another fascist obsession. It bans what it considers “effeminate” behavior. It exhorts men and women to procreate — focusing on Han Chinese, while doing the opposite with ethnic minorities like Uyghurs.
When I was in Beijing, the foreign press corps described China as authoritarian when necessary — but entire articles concerning China’s political system could also be written without mentioning the word. Now "authoritarian" is commonly used. But is it time to reassess this?