And we're back for the second and presumably final day of Couy Griffin's bench trial. Judge McFadden will hear final arguments and then deliver his verdict.
As Judge McFadden signaled yesterday, he told prosecutors this morning he was a lot closer to a guilty verdict on the 1752(a)(1) entering and remaining charge than the 1752(a)(2) disorderly conduct charge. Tells them to focus their closing arguments there.
Judge McFadden asks prosecutor Janani Iyengar if Couy Griffin needed to know the vice president was in the building for him to find him guilty of entering a restricted area. Iyengar says that's not required.
Onto the disorderly and disruptive conduct charge. Iyengar says Griffin climbed over multiple walls, including using a metal bike rack as a ladder.

Iyengar replays the clip of Griffin saying things are going to get "less and less peaceful" if "laws" aren't followed.
Iyengar says the presence of rioters like Griffin caused the security issue that forced VP Mike Pence to be evacuated from the Senate Wing.
Defense attorney David Smith speaking now. Says the case is built on a series of "false assumptions and premises." He goes back again to the USCP determining the restricted area, which... Judge McFadden already told him he'd failed on yesterday.
David Smith repeats his line of argument that the vice president does not "temporarily" visit the Senate. Judge McFadden cuts him off and asks if someone would not be committing a 1752 violation if they illegally entered Camp David?
"The government didn't offer any evidence at all of Mr. Griffin's purpose there. They're merely alleging he was there," Smith says.
"The Secret Service understands something the prosecution does not: the vice president works at the Capitol. He does not temporarily visit it," Smith says.
Smith says Matt Struck testified that no one told them all day they were in a restricted area.

"What do I do with the fact that I have statements from your own client saying he was told?" Judge McFadden asks.

Smith says that doesn't surpass reasonable doubt.
Smith says Couy Griffin was "mouthing off" when he said law enforcement had told him not to enter the area. Shades of Guy Reffitt's "bragging" defense.
"What about the fact that your client was at the Capitol the day before?" Judge McFadden asks.

No evidence he saw any of the snow fencing or the restricted area signs, Smith responds.
"We have a problem though," McFadden says. "He went up to the stage. If it was just one wall, but he went over three walls. He went up to a door he said needed to be broken down."
David Smith says it's case law in the D.C. Circuit that the steps of the U.S. Capitol Building are a public forum.
"He's being prosecuted for standing on these steps that this court has held are a public forum! This is remarkable!" Smith says.

"But he wasn't on the steps. He was on the stage," McFadden says.
Smith says a ruling in this case would not apply to every other 1752 case as the government fears. Hard to say if that's true.
"Do we assume a guilty mind based on crossing a stone wall that surrounds a public forum?" Smith asks.
"The government's knowledge case rests on the absurdity that Mr. Griffin knew a restricted area the government's own Secret Service agent didn't recognize," Smith says.
Smith goes back to his argument that the visitor's center /loading dock in the basement of the Capitol Building are not part of the Capitol Building, which McFadden already told him to move on from yesterday.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jordan Fischer

Jordan Fischer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JordanOnRecord

Mar 22
"The government has not offered a single text message from Griffin indicating his knowledge that the vice president was in the building," Nick Smith says.
Smith says the evidence shows Griffin thought the votes had already been certified before he reached the Capitol.
Smith says nothing Griffin said on January 6 satisfies the Brandenburg test (about inciteful speech). Says Griffin leading a prayer that "calmed people down" was "not just disorderly conduct, that's the antithesis of disorderly conduct."
Read 25 tweets
Mar 21
Good morning. We're back at the federal courthouse in D.C. this week for the bench trial of "Cowboys for Trump" founder Couy Griffin. google.com/amp/s/www.wusa…
Griffin is only facing two misdemeanor counts. He's decided to go to trial to argue the Capitol was not a restricted area on January 6 because VP Pence had already been evacuated by the time he arrived. google.com/amp/s/www.wusa…
Little bit of legal wrangling this morning. Griffin's attorneys say the DOJ provided them a big batch of new discovery over the past few days. That includes ~60 video files from Griffin's videographer, Matt Struck, who will be called as a witness.
Read 83 tweets
Mar 18
Judge McFadden denied Couy Griffin's request for an evidentiary hearing, but WILL allow him to cross-examine a USSS agent about VP Pence's whereabouts on J6.

He cites the DOJ's big (and belatedly corrected) error in saying VP-elect Harris was at the Capitol during the riot. Image
Judge McFadden also shot down Couy Griffin's selective prosecution argument. Points out there were thousands of people protesting/voicing the same political opinions as him there that day. Says it's "illogical" to claim the DOJ is selectively targeting him for those same beliefs. Image
Couy Griffin's central defense is going to be that VP Mike Pence was evacuated from the Capitol on January 6 (Capitol Police say he did NOT leave the complex) and that, therefore, the temporary restricted area was not in effect when Griffin entered the grounds.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 17
Brandon Fellows has filed a new motion.
"We have it worse than the black population did in 1950s Montgomery."
Federal judges actually love it when you explain the U.S. Constitution to them line-by-line with personal commentary.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 17
Lucas Denney will be back in court today at 3:30 p.m. for a second attempt at pleading guilty to the one-count indictment against him. The DOJ has estimated his recommended sentencing range as high as 71 months. wusa9.com/article/news/n…
Denney briefly threw the court into disarray earlier this week when his lawyer unexpectedly said he wanted to plead guilty (to try to preempt a new indictment). Here's how pleas are supposed to play out, per Chief Judge Beryl Howell's standing order. Image
Lucas Denney's plea hearing should be starting any minute before Judge Moss. Defense and DOJ came up with a 3-point difference in offense level, which could add 20 months to the upper range.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 17
Also, uh, hello? Ilya Kaminksy? Famed Ukrainian-American poet with a famed poem about this exact situation? Hits a little too close to the mark, I guess.
A fun thing you guys don't know about me is that I double-majored in poetry.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(