Top 5 alter egos who have to WORK to make the super hero work: 1. Bruce Banner 2. Bruce Wayne 3. Matt Murdock 4. Peter Parker/Miles Morales 5. Bill Batson
1. Hulk is a completely different character if Banner is a dick as intended (Ed Norton) or fundamentally nice (Mark Ruffalo). Both *can* work but they have to link. 2. Wayne is more compelling than Batman when done right. 3. Murdock is a lot like Banner, actually.
4. You know how important Peter or Miles is because you see how Spider-Man just hits all different depending on which one you're rolling with. 5. Billy as the kid is what make Shazam actually fun.
Not Applicable: Diana Prince, Steve Rodgers, Tony Stark.
All of these "alter-egos" are exactly the same as their super hero versions, just with different clothes. Thus, you don't need these people to exist as "normal" humans in the real world, b/c that's not their jam.
A note on Clark Kent.
So.... you know how in Kill Bill, Quentin Tarantino does this whole monologue about how Clark is Superman looking down on Earthlings? I think big Q has it wrong.
Clark IS the character. SUPERMAN is the alter-ego. And that's the trick...
Because Superman is boring and one dimensional and totally OP and it makes NO SENSE that he's out there stopping street level violence instead of WARS BETWEEN NATIONS like Iron Man.
But Clark is interesting and the movies that work focus on him.
So I could say that Clark is the *most important* alter-ego but in my (admittedly drunk) head right now I'm married to the proposition that Superman is the alter-ego and he sucks.... and that's why I wrote the thread.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I think @DickDurbin did a very good job. Obviously I wanted him to shove the gavel up Ted Cruz's ass, but I know that's an unrealistic request.
Over all, Durbin was very chairman-like. 9/10.
BUT...
I really think Democrats need to get at least ONE person on the committee who can match the Republicans in terms of indignation and energy. This "we go high" mess might make them feel good about themselves in the cloak room, but it doesn't play on TV.
We need at least one bomb thrower on that committee. One shit poster. One person who *every time* Lindsey Graham "storms" out puts a cardboard cutout of Lindsey on a fainting couch in his chair. One person who is going to read Dr. Seuss BACK TO Ted.
I know that this is going to be lost on a lot of white people and almost all white Republicans. But when you see Booker or Padilla getting emotional... I just don't think y'all know how *hard* it is. For us. To get her.
I know some white people will get offended "we work hard too" and all that. Sure. People of color have to work *harder.* Straight up. There are *more* hurdles. There is *more* bullshit. You have no idea how many racist crap we've have to deal with on the way.
It's hard as fuck. And when you see someone who gets there too. Someone else whose *earned* it. And you KNOW what it's been like to be in those shoes... Damn straight you're emotional.
Jackson just got choked up and said "persevere." That's what it is yo.
Going to live tweet the technical end of round 1 (Ossoff and Tillis). Then I'll keep an eye on Round 2 questions of course, but won't be doing a straight play by play because I have to actually write today and do some media.
If you're looking for more play by play, just hit up @RewireNewsGroup like I do. :)
I do wonder which Black authors the @GOP will get pissed off about today. I imagine @tedcruz will come prepared with Doc McStuffins slides.
Nice. @JoyAnnReid " @DrIbram is not a critical race theorist and anybody who tells you otherwise is ignorant or lying."
God damn. Joy was on my TV for five minutes and MELTED IT
OH SHIT... And Chris Hayes just basically called out Gym Jordan and the fact that Republicans too often DON'T take allegation of child sexual assault seriously
All righty, Confirmation Hearing question day. Durbin says it's "Trial by Ordeal" #ConfirmationHearing
Jackson describes her 3 step process;
1: Start from a position of neutrality
2: Evaluating all the facts from various perspectives
3: Apply law to facts, while observing the constraints on judicial authority. (jurisdiction, precedent, "ADHERANCE TO TEXT")
She says she's constrained by the "original public meaning" which is the buzzword that conservatives know. But then says "sometimes that's enough."
And of course SOMETIMES it's not, but conservatives oversell their hands by acting like it always is.
Time for Jackson's opening statement. If you were waiting for today's moment, here it is. #ConfirmJudgeJackson
Jackson: "It is faith that sustains me at this moment."
That's cool. For me it's brats right now because we grilled this weekend.
Jackson points out how her brother volunteered for the army after the 9/11 attacks... but Republicans are STILL going to call her a terrorist sympathizer for defending Gitmo detainees.