With Putin engaged in ominous nuclear sabre rattling since the eve of his invasion of Ukraine, a debate has been raging among nuclear experts over whether and when he might make good on his threats. newstatesman.com/security/2022/…
Although most experts agree that the overall risk of nuclear weapons being used in this conflict remains low, one of these scenarios appears more likely than the other.
If Putin’s objective is the occupation of at least some parts of Ukraine, it is hard to see how the use of a nuclear weapon on the country serves his interests.
However, the prospect for a limited nuclear strike against the United States or Nato seems, relatively, greater.
Indeed, Putin has promised that anyone who stands in his way will face consequences “such as you have never seen in your entire history”.
With few concrete answers available, some analysts have looked to the documents that lay out the circumstances under which Russia says it would or could use nuclear weapons for clues.
Moscow’s military doctrine states that:
🔴 Russia “shall reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies”.
🔴 Or“in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation.”
A 2020 presidential decree further indicates that Moscow could use nuclear weapons in response to;
🔴 “Reliable data on a launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territory of Russia or its allies”
🔴Or following “the use of nuclear weapons against Russia or its allies”.
But because Putin’s war on Ukraine falls outside the scope of these protocols, these nuclear policies are neither especially helpful nor reassuring in this case.
Although its conventional capabilities have improved significantly over the last decade, Moscow still relies on its nuclear weapons for flexibility in managing the risk of escalation.
This suggests that Russia would not automatically resort to nuclear weapons to win a conventional war, as some have argued.
What is still unclear is at what stage Moscow might deem its conventional tools to have been exhausted, or what Putin himself might consider an existential threat.
Without knowing where Putin’s red lines are in this conflict, Western policymakers cannot know how to avoid crossing them. newstatesman.com/security/2022/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 The powerful closing paragraphs of @Anoosh_C's story, Bust Britain. 🧵
“Collapsing councils are a microcosm of the British state’s failings: austerity, short-termism, Treasury myopia and decades of failure to solve the so-called wicked problems of policymaking, such as council tax, planning and our broken social care model. Every block in the Jenga tower appears to be wobbling.
“The NHS is stuck with one in ten jobs vacant, crumbling buildings and equipment, strikes and poor patient outcomes. Welfare is no longer acting as a safety net: the UK now has record levels of long-term sickness at 2.8 million and a system too threadbare to propel people back into work. So depleted are our armed forces that military chiefs mull the return of conscription. Police fail to solve 90 per cent of crimes. And best of luck to anyone who encounters a prison or courtroom.
Today the £4.2bn industry as a whole is in labour crisis.
In recent decades, the children and grandchildren of pioneering Bengali restaurateurs have opted not to join the family business, going instead into professional jobs supported by access to university.
The steady stream of migrants looking to start out in the kitchen and build a successful restaurant has slowed to a trickle, too.
In 2007, 12,000 Indian restaurants were open across the UK. Today there are only 8,500 – and more are closing every week, according to the industry.
What does the reshuffle tell us about the Prime Minister?
Sunak’s hand was forced as he could no longer delay the appointment of a new party chairman.
He has tried to turn Zahawi’s sacking to his advantage by framing the reshuffle as a “100-day reset” of his government, which is mired in crisis due to strikes, scandals and the squeeze on living standards.
Ukraine’s national security adviser, @OleksiyDanilov, speaks to @MacaesBruno about German betrayal, the coming Russian onslaught and why the West is scared.
Read more ⬇️
Danilov shared his thoughts on Germany’s refusal to send Leopard 2 battle tanks to Kyiv, who might eventually replace Vladimir Putin and why Russia wants a “Korean solution” to end the war.
He also spoke about the helicopter crash in Brovary, Ukraine, on 18 January – in which 14 people died, including Ukraine’s interior affairs minister – and whether Russia was responsible.