The current trip to Europe is a good an example of leadership in action from a US president as we have seen in many years. Not just confidence, competence, and a clear vision at a critical moment but leading by example. We're not just talking the talk, we're walking the walk.
In critical area after critical area, we've seen concrete steps to ratchet up support for Ukraine, for Europe and to increase pressure on Europe, meaningful measures on military & humanitarian aid, sanctions, energy security for our allies.
As importantly, thanks to effective diplomacy and a real commitment to being a good partner, @POTUS, @SecBlinken, @SecDef, @JakeSullivan46 & their teams have helped usher in an era in which the Atlantic Alliance is more unified than it has been for years.
What is more in an evolving crisis, the steps taken by the US and our allies have been robust--the strongest response ever to Putin's abhorrent behavior--and they have evolved swiftly as circumstances have warranted.
The US has also gained credibility throughout because our view of the risks, the intelligence we have shared, the measures we have called for, have all proven to be correct. We have led the way in staying a step ahead of Putin and that has won respect in Europe.
Big challenges await. More can and use be done. But so far, it is no wonder that America's standing with our allies is at a higher point that it has been in years--showing double digit gains in 20 of 27 NATO states.
We have not just recovered from the disastrous Trump years but in a number of cases after just one year, the Biden team has won approval from our allies that surpasses that of the Obama years as well. news.gallup.com/poll/391160/im…
What we're seeing is that the American people made the right choice in 2020 and that at a moment of great crisis, we have precisely the kind of experienced international leadership from the USG that we need.
Here's my latest on the developments in Europe this week (that underscore just how complex the challenges we face are and that the weeks and months ahead will be even more demanding): thedailybeast.com/nato-is-prepar…
p.s. As I've often noted, foreign policy is hard and no one or no team gets it exactly right. I think the US could well have done more for Ukraine sooner in terms of military aid, probably should've found a way to get them the aircraft that were available...
...probably should not have publicly ruled out certain responses to Putin, etc. My own preference would be to lean in a little more. But having said that, the response to a very complex situation has been so good at so many levels, we should appreciate that and be grateful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Brief, cool-headed, foreign policy analysis on why the President saying Putin has got to go is not a problem.
1.) It's true. So long as Putin is at the helm in Russia, the country will be isolated and its people will needlessly suffer.
2.) Offending a sociopathic mass-murderer who has serially violated internationally law, committed countless war crimes and crimes against humanity, and has the deaths of tens of thousands of innocents on his hands, is not actually the wrong thing to do.
3.) No, seriously, what is he going to do that he has not already done? (And please, he is not going to escalate the war because Biden called for him to go when countless others have done so, called him a war criminal, and worse.) He's not that thin skinned.
Naturally, much press attention is being devoted to Biden's final remark. First, it shouldn't distract from the historical significance of the speech. We're a watershed in history. Biden described the stakes well & is correct that this will be the defining struggle of our times.
Next, Russian "outrage" at the remark is transparent, hypocritical & they would have found reason for outrage no matter what Biden said. They are serially committed war crimes against an innocent neighbor. They have attacked American democracy directly.
They have actually tried to choose who America's leader was and depose the leader of Ukraine. They have no moral standing to make any criticism of Biden whatsoever. Finally, while Biden's final comment, that Putin has to go, may have distracted from the foreign policy thrust...
President Biden's historic speech will be seen as defining a line in history, a moment when the world was once again formally divided between the forces of democracy and those of autocracy, between those who value freedom and those who fear it.
It was resonant because it echoed the past. It was resonant because not far from where the President spoke, the brutality of the enemy we are facing, the stakes in this battle and the courage of those we fight alongside were all being made so clear in Ukraine.
But it was also resonant for Americans because unlike in the past, we know the dividing line about which @POTUS spoke cuts through our country like a knife. The forces of authoritarianism have already attacked our democracy and continue to do so.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has revealed a geopolitical landscape quite different from that officials and many experts thought was in place. On the one hand, as many have noted, the Atlantic alliance has come together and is now more unified than in decades.
There are countries that have indicated that within that alliance that they are less reliable and more sympathetic to Russia, like Hungary. Next, Russia and China have revealed they are committed to a close working partnership.
China may be ill at ease with some of the conduct of this war but has committed to assisting Russia. Both Xi and Putin see the U.S. as a threat to their ambitions and their desire to counter U.S. influence is one of the primary motivations behind the partnership.
Before the invasion began, it looked like there were a couple possibilities for the Russians, strengthen claims to Donbas, Luhansk, Crimea or expand them westward possibly to Dnieper or go for all of Ukraine, take Kiev and decapitate the government.
They tried the last option, the big one, and are failing. Now there are rumblings they may fall back to the least ambitious option--after having devastated Ukraine and their own army. If they do, and it's a way out for Ukraine...well, that's up to Ukraine.
But, by any other metric it will have been a failure, a black eye for Russia, the economic consequences of sanctions and the war itself will take many years from which to recover and even if Ukraine cedes those territories, it can be a win for Kiev and Zelenskyy.
I don't want to stir up the hornets nest of Merrick Garland defenders (yes, I know, seeing nothing is exactly what we should be seeing), but I've got to say, so far all we get daily is more proof of serious crimes from Trump & his bunch and so far...
...not one single example of holding them accountable. This is true at the state and local level too. (The @ManhattanDA situation is a clear example of the wrong decision being made at the wrong time in the wrong way.) Yes, yes...don't @me...it all takes time.
Yes, yes...the processes are all deeply secretive. Yes, yes...there are clues buried in the fourteenth paragraph of the twelfth page of the most recent DoJ filing that suggest that it is possible that Trump might be a person of interest in some unspecified investigation someday.