2/ Sweden never officially admitted following herd immunity as a strategy, but internal docs show this was a significant consideration in policy decisions
3/ Internally Sweden saw children and schools as a way of facilitating herd immunity whole publicity claiming children didn't play a role in transmission
4/ Remember Viners April systematic review?
"Schools don't play a significant role in transmission"
We had less likely to be infected, then less likely to infect, then "community transmission" then it was no need for measures as all the kids have been infected already
5/ Viners report is still quoted in the Green Book for LA, its also quoted in some of the Swedish documents
PHEs tame paediatricians still claiming its just "community transmission"
After writing this report Viner was brought into SAGE meetings
6/ FOI requests regularly denied and redacted
Plan focused on "not spreading fear" they persuaded themselves not telling the truth was in the public interest
Protecting the economy prioritised
6/ Very much like the "stop living in fear" "end of lockdown anxiety" articles we were flooded with by media.
This was the same time as eat out to help out...
7/Sweden relied almost entirely on their own studies ignoring international evidence just like the UK, eg
DfE on school transmission, their masks survey, air filters. Despite large amounts of evidence DfE only looks at their own often underpowered studies, often poor methods
8/ The sentence above
"Elderly people were administered morphine instead of oxygen despite available supplies"🤯
Horrific, sounds like a lot like a cull
9/ Sweden saw keeping any measures out of schools as an important part of the strategy, withholding testing means they could deny having any evidence of transmission, however now data on longcovid and harms of losing relatives is mounting
Took ages to get testing into UK schools
10/ Unlike most other countries school attendance remained mandatory, parents were fined for keeping children off to protect CEV kids/ family
11/ Swedish authorities misrepresented and manipulated the data they did have on children's role in transmission, so those using Swedish data to argue against measures in schools were using unreliable evidence
12/ Previously released internal emails show Ludvigsson and Tegnell finding an increase in child mortality and then deciding how to make this inconvenient fact go away
Schools not informing parents of outbreaks like UK
Outbreaks not reported, remember the UK cases vs outbreak reporting that fudged the scale of the problem particularly autumn/winter 2020
14/ Care home deaths cover up
15/ As I said earlier, lying to prevent fear and worry was considered to be for the greater good.
Thou shall not question your Government
16/ No gov evidence provided until April, like UK, lots of redactions and issues with FOI requests, hard to see how guidence was produced
17/ Hmm refusal to answer FOIs, I think Swedish journalists have now gotten a lot more information out of their government than we have in the UK
19/ In Sweden they deleted emails requested, in the UK the main deleting has been over contracts to chums, when it comes to pandemic strategy the UK just refuse
20/ In April Sweden set up a new committee that would oversee decisions in secrecy
21/ The UK did this in July
Remember the Joint Biosecurity Centre?They were apparently responsible for the chilli peppers alert levels
31/ Full strategy developed behind closed doors, never properly communicated to the public, Sweden continue with misleading information, talking points not followed up with action
"Doing all we can to..."
32/ The report has a certain repetitiveness regarding asymptomatic spread,masks,and schools
Also they downplayed scale of spread repeatedly while claiming herd immunity was close,which surely requires lots of infections?🤷♂️
UK has had Freedom day and living with the virus day now
33/ How many press briefings have we seen in the UK where we couldn’t get straight answers, when the advisors diplomatically talked around the facts
34/ Lack of meaningful political opposition means that citizens cannot change the pandemic strategy through their voting choices at the next election
35/ Intentional misinformation facilitated the spread of the virus, refusal to make changes to the influenza plan despite the evidence
36/ Authorities didn't trust the Public enough to be straight with the public
Recommendations makes legal protections more difficult
37/ Consequence of letting it rip was increased inequality of social justice
38/ Sweden knew about the inequality, they blamed foreigners
How many UK pundits have been overly focused on weight in regards to covid?
39/ In Sweden people were expected to take personal responsibility for their own risk, ignoring asymptomatic cases, if vulnerable ppl get sick its likely their fault
Bit like current UK thinking offering LFTs just to the vulnerable
40/ Essentially the Swedish strategy is one which accommodates middle/upper class
41/ That's the report, now a few extra considerations
Mid March Tegnell and UK were trying to persuade others to adopt herd immunity
From Italian ministers⬇️
42/ There is a pre pandemic link with Tegnell and Giesecke to the UK, both studies at London school of tropical medicine, Whitty was also there
48/ I would like to see more comparison threads like this for other countries, I'll compile them into threads to add to my pinned tweet, been working on the international perspective
Also, if you haven't already the JCVI minutes are interesting
🧵 Amazing when RW media decide to care about SEND students
When it comes to VAT on private schools they are suddenly worried about SEND pupils, but they backed austerity, the dismantling of CAHMs real terms cuts to school budgets, and loss of 20,000 support staff mainly TAs
2/ I think it was autumn 2017 we had a protest regarding SEND students being let down over 80,000 educators and SEND parents gathered outside Westminster, it didn't get a single mention in the media from any outlet
3/ 2016 ATL conference motions booklet
Look at the issues we were trying to raise, issues largely ignored, and only raised when suits a narrative
2/ Initial funding for CG
Von Opels who have been large Conservative Party donors and also gave Gupta £90,000 after her April 2020 paper claiming herd immunity was on the horizon
Luke Johnson, funded anti-lockdown MPs and appeared at a Pandata event
Opaque Baudouin Foundation and
3/ The Donors Trust, the dark money ATM of the US right wing, where do they get their money from?⬇️
🧵So Shamez Ladhani, the UKs clinical lead on covid in children, member of a WHO TAG for covid in children, lead for most UK gov studies on covid in children, most cited paed in world on covid in children, has written another paper with Hoeg and Noble from Urgency of Normal
2/ Hoeg produced the VAERS dumpster dive that made headlines in UK about myocarditis damaging confidence in covid vax for younger age groups, member of Urgency of Normal, Norfollk Group and DeSantis/Ladapo's Ethics committee that includes GBD author Bhattacharya
3/ Table of evidence collected
Look at choices of evidence, the same sizes, etc worth zooming in to take a look
In the UK we should be looking at those who have attached themselves to the US radical right, are promoting the same false narratives about gov censorship whilst promoting disinformation