Thread by @orwell2022

1/ Here they go, the lockdown and mask fanatics.

In future, there shall be no dissidents allowed like Sweden, who prove that the Dutch response was wrong.

There must be a global authority (WHO) and the entire world must follow like soldiers. The end of nations.

https://twitter.com/MarionKoopmans/status/1507611937089232899

2/ Creating this type of control data (SWE) must be prevented at all cost in future. There must be one and only one autocratic response. Masking 2 year olds for example. The WHO (a group many autocratic countries) shall rule democratic countries like Sweden and the Netherlands.

3/ What @MarionKoopmans probably means is, that everyone should be like Germany now and not the other way around.

So the WHO (an organisation outside of law with total immunity) needs worldwide total powers to enforce and overrule those freedom seeking democratic nations.

4/ @MarionKoopmans knows too well, that

<sarcasm> the green list are true science following countries while Scandinavia is a culture of radical anti-science autocracies. We must stop Scandinavian freedom nationalism in the name of true worldwide democracy (UNO-WHO).
</sarcasm>

5/ We must all follow the legally immune UN (who is outside law) without exceptions.

The scandal list is endless. They have god status powers which cannot be challenged under terrestrial courts. Surprised that it's misused?

apnews.com/article/1cf479…

economist.com/unknown/2005/0…

6/ Who will rule us? WHO Director Tedros happens to be a member of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) founded as a communist revolutionary party who came to power 1991 in Ethiopia.

Sound attractive? Better than SWE and NL democracy/law?

Read about Tedros...

7/ Handing over powers to diplomatic super national organisations is a bad idea.

Without legal prosecution possibilities, the corruption is temptation is built in and happens. It's the nature of humans. That's why we have law and constitutions.

8/ In the new world of pandemics (WHO and Gates words), law, nations and constitutions just disturb.

So let's abolish it and give powers to a legally immune supernational institute who reliably delivers scandals after scandals?

What could possibly go wrong...?

9/ Is it an exception? No.

Here is another one which is more and more enjoying their legal immunity options. Skandal after scandal.

If bending / breaking law is legal, why not use it to make more and more money? And for personal gain.

techrights.org/2015/02/11/zel…

10/ What about the EC-EMA? Legal immunity, while getting 86% of their funding through commissions from the pharma industry.

ema.europa.eu/en/about-us/ho…

What could go wrong?

Do you want the WHO to decide about your freedom, body and children? If yes, you deserve what's coming.

11/ Dear @MarionKoopmans : what happened here?

"COVID Investigator Funded By Chinese Communist Party Removed From WHO Team Following National Pulse Exposé."

thenationalpulse.com/2021/12/10/sca…