Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Orwell2024 Profile picture
@orwell2022
Mar 26, 2022 • 11 tweets • 5 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
1/ Here they go, the lockdown and mask fanatics.

In future, there shall be no dissidents allowed like Sweden, who prove that the Dutch response was wrong.

There must be a global authority (WHO) and the entire world must follow like soldiers. The end of nations.
2/ Creating this type of control data (SWE) must be prevented at all cost in future. There must be one and only one autocratic response. Masking 2 year olds for example. The WHO (a group many autocratic countries) shall rule democratic countries like Sweden and the Netherlands.
3/ What @MarionKoopmans probably means is, that everyone should be like Germany now and not the other way around.

So the WHO (an organisation outside of law with total immunity) needs worldwide total powers to enforce and overrule those freedom seeking democratic nations.
4/ @MarionKoopmans knows too well, that

<sarcasm> the green list are true science following countries while Scandinavia is a culture of radical anti-science autocracies. We must stop Scandinavian freedom nationalism in the name of true worldwide democracy (UNO-WHO).
</sarcasm>
5/ We must all follow the legally immune UN (who is outside law) without exceptions.

The scandal list is endless. They have god status powers which cannot be challenged under terrestrial courts. Surprised that it's misused?

apnews.com/article/1cf479…

economist.com/unknown/2005/0…
6/ Who will rule us? WHO Director Tedros happens to be a member of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) founded as a communist revolutionary party who came to power 1991 in Ethiopia.

Sound attractive? Better than SWE and NL democracy/law?

Read about Tedros...
7/ Handing over powers to diplomatic super national organisations is a bad idea.

Without legal prosecution possibilities, the corruption is temptation is built in and happens. It's the nature of humans. That's why we have law and constitutions.
8/ In the new world of pandemics (WHO and Gates words), law, nations and constitutions just disturb.

So let's abolish it and give powers to a legally immune supernational institute who reliably delivers scandals after scandals?

What could possibly go wrong...?
9/ Is it an exception? No.

Here is another one which is more and more enjoying their legal immunity options. Skandal after scandal.

If bending / breaking law is legal, why not use it to make more and more money? And for personal gain.

techrights.org/2015/02/11/zel…
10/ What about the EC-EMA? Legal immunity, while getting 86% of their funding through commissions from the pharma industry.

ema.europa.eu/en/about-us/ho…

What could go wrong?

Do you want the WHO to decide about your freedom, body and children? If yes, you deserve what's coming.
11/ Dear @MarionKoopmans : what happened here?

"COVID Investigator Funded By Chinese Communist Party Removed From WHO Team Following National Pulse Exposé."

thenationalpulse.com/2021/12/10/sca…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Orwell2024

Orwell2024 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @orwell2022

Orwell2024 Profile picture
Jul 1
1/ A famous @BerkeleyEarth paper found no rural–urban difference despite the well known UHI impacting most historical stations. How is this paradox possible?

They used MODIS=🚮. At 10 m Sentinel-2, their “rural” stations light up urban.

Examples 🟥=real estate👇 Image
2/ MODIS uses a binary classification with a high threshold to flip to “urban,” so many urban sites are labeled “rural.” That compares urban to urban. BE also uses fragmented records and a changing station ensemble = 🚮. Apply one basic filter—data must exist ≥9 months/year👇 Image
3/ Using a quantitative urbanization metric (with units) from S2-GHSL at ~2000× higher resolution, the curves split as expected. BE paper should have raised ALL red flags in peer review: no units, no Q criteria, no methods, implausible results. Yet it passed. Still no retraction. Image
Read 7 tweets
Orwell2024 Profile picture
Mar 18
1/ Can you actually find a hockey stick in truly rural stations?
Not in a stitched statistical construct — in a real, coherent station record.
Here’s a tool to test it yourself.

Link below. Image
2/ This map shows all stations with 100 years of data and at least 9 valid months per year.
That leaves about 500

🌎 🌎

Stations are colored by the level of built-up area around the site. Click any station to view its details and temperature curve. orwell2024.github.io/builtmap/Image
3/ Low built-up ≠ high-quality station. It’s a mandatory condition, not a guarantee.

Switch to sat view and inspect the site closely— the problems often shows up immediately. Like here.
Coastal locations
commonly have this issue. Water makes them appear rural. They aren’t. Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Orwell2024 Profile picture
Jan 30
Spectacular model failure: the simulation is detached from reality.

MEASURED (MODIS): cooling.
ERA5 model: warming.

Same grid cell, same year but OPPOSITE trend?

If a “model” can’t even get the sign right it’s a full fledged GIGO failure. Worse than worthless. Image
Flagged this two years ago, and it’s still absurd.

Measured surface temperature (LST) is declining since 2000.

ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/ist_cli…

ERA5 shows 2 m air warming. Wrong trend, same place, same period.

Worse: ERA5 “surface” proxy warms too. Misses LST too.!! x.com/orwell2022/sta…Image
Here’s the part that should make you stare:

ERA5 “2 m air” is derived from surface T.

So when LST is cooling ERA5 should follow the observed surface.

It doesn’t. The ERA5 surface proxy warms too.

Not a model of reality but a calculation of what they’d like reality to be. Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Orwell2024 Profile picture
Jan 26
1/ People use “reanalysis” as if it is thermometer data. It is NOT.
Reanalysis is a computer weather model.

So we test it: ERA5 vs USCRN on grid level. Result: cooler past, warmer present pivot in ERA5 vs stations. Model ❌

~1.5 °C 🔴 model error vs ground truth (measured 🔵) Image
2/ Maybe it works for Blackville — another of the few pristine hUSCRN sites.
Same model failure.

When a SW model disagrees with ground-truth HW thermometers at the grid level, nature isn’t wrong.
The model is. Image
3/ Another one.

HOLLY_SPRINGS__4_N

That’s a spectacular failure / bias of the model. Image
Read 16 tweets
Orwell2024 Profile picture
Nov 13, 2025
1/ This brigheting since 1980 is known in prof. circles.

Here’s the data from Germany (Potsdam).

+15 W/m² 🌞since the 1980s. ✅

Yet the public narrative claims climate change/CO₂ (~+1.4 W/m² over the same period). ❌

The gap between evidence and narraitive is 10x....off. Image
2/ The analysis is already done. DWD and peer-reviewed literature.
It matches what we saw from JMA and KNMI raw data:
a +10–20 W/m² increase in surface solar radiation.

So the question:
How did they get away with knowing this and selling the story of ~1.4 W from CO₂ instead? Image
3/ What does the literature say?

“...dimming/brightening not only occurred when clouds are considered, but also under cloud-free conditions when cloud effects are absent.”

A remarkably way to say:
It’s not clouds. Not CO₂. Not climate. Pollution.

They’ve known for decades Image
Read 8 tweets
Orwell2024 Profile picture
Aug 6, 2025
A +14 W/m² total solar increase over 50 years is realistic. Japan alone shows +20 W/m². That’s 10× larger than the minuscule additional CO₂ forcing (~1W). And nearly 50× greater than the impact of sunspot cycles (±0.5 W).

So why is the climate scam still lying? Image
Image
Japan has one of the best measurement data. The analysis is clear. The brightening amount to almost 20 W. That is a lot. But the main and dominant effect is still urbanization, which makes up to 6°. Image
Link 1: the brightening. It explains why the climate scam likes to start in the maximum smog dimming period of 1970. It is a shameless bad faith deception. The effect is ball part of +1°C. In dry areas up to 3°C.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(