Researchers persuaded 76 companies, each of which employed between 1,000 and 100,000 employees and worked in 50 or more countries, to take part in their study by switching to at least one meeting-free day per week.
For a company, the organisational problem of meetings is that they usually only benefit one person.
The most common meeting structure is one in which junior employees do the work of providing information to a manager, then wait and watch while others do the same.
One-to-one meetings were entirely ruled out in the study as well.
Over two years, from 2019 to 2021 – during which time, the world’s offices switched to online meetings – they surveyed more than 25,000 employees on what changed when meetings were restricted.
The researchers gathered both quantitative data (on how the companies performed) and qualitative data (how employees felt about their work), interviewing executives and HR managers.
Across the board, the change improved every metric they measured.
The study showed micromanaging came down when there were less meetings.
Stress also came down and autonomy increased.
Across all the companies in the study, the most beneficial results came when companies restricted meetings to two days per week.
At the companies with more meeting-free days, meeting quality went up.
Interestingly, the reduction in meetings didn’t lead to an increase in the other great stressor of white-collar life: email.
In fact, employees’ satisfaction with how they communicated rose. More hygienic meetings lead to more hygienic communication elsewhere.
Meetings are also literally toxic: gathering a group of people into a room can raise carbon dioxide to far above the outdoor level.
Reducing meetings would reduce CO2 levels in the room.
But this doesn’t necessarily mean all meetings are pointless. The meeting is as least as old as work itself, and for employees, it serves a human as well as a corporate purpose.
As the world returns to the office, there is an opportunity for companies to take a more rational approach to people’s time, writes @willydunn.
🧵 The powerful closing paragraphs of @Anoosh_C's story, Bust Britain. 🧵
“Collapsing councils are a microcosm of the British state’s failings: austerity, short-termism, Treasury myopia and decades of failure to solve the so-called wicked problems of policymaking, such as council tax, planning and our broken social care model. Every block in the Jenga tower appears to be wobbling.
“The NHS is stuck with one in ten jobs vacant, crumbling buildings and equipment, strikes and poor patient outcomes. Welfare is no longer acting as a safety net: the UK now has record levels of long-term sickness at 2.8 million and a system too threadbare to propel people back into work. So depleted are our armed forces that military chiefs mull the return of conscription. Police fail to solve 90 per cent of crimes. And best of luck to anyone who encounters a prison or courtroom.
Today the £4.2bn industry as a whole is in labour crisis.
In recent decades, the children and grandchildren of pioneering Bengali restaurateurs have opted not to join the family business, going instead into professional jobs supported by access to university.
The steady stream of migrants looking to start out in the kitchen and build a successful restaurant has slowed to a trickle, too.
In 2007, 12,000 Indian restaurants were open across the UK. Today there are only 8,500 – and more are closing every week, according to the industry.
What does the reshuffle tell us about the Prime Minister?
Sunak’s hand was forced as he could no longer delay the appointment of a new party chairman.
He has tried to turn Zahawi’s sacking to his advantage by framing the reshuffle as a “100-day reset” of his government, which is mired in crisis due to strikes, scandals and the squeeze on living standards.
Ukraine’s national security adviser, @OleksiyDanilov, speaks to @MacaesBruno about German betrayal, the coming Russian onslaught and why the West is scared.
Read more ⬇️
Danilov shared his thoughts on Germany’s refusal to send Leopard 2 battle tanks to Kyiv, who might eventually replace Vladimir Putin and why Russia wants a “Korean solution” to end the war.
He also spoke about the helicopter crash in Brovary, Ukraine, on 18 January – in which 14 people died, including Ukraine’s interior affairs minister – and whether Russia was responsible.