Russia Has A Justification For Invading Ukraine: A Preemptive Attack To Force Ukrainian Non-Alignment In The Name Of Self-Defense Meets The Carolina Test:
Putin: Russia will be dragged into war if Ukraine joins NATO @TRTWorld threadreaderapp.com/thread/1508163…
2/"Russian President Putin warns Ukraine's accession to NATO could embolden Kiev to reclaim control over Moscow-annexed Crimea or areas ruled by separatists, sucking Moscow into the conflict.
President Vladimir Putin has accused the US and its NATO allies of ignoring Russia's top
3/"security demands, warning Ukraine, once becoming a member of NATO, could try to reclaim lost territories from separatist rebels, sucking Moscow into the war.
"Imagine that Ukraine becomes a NATO member and launches those military operations," Putin said on Tuesday. "Should we
4/"fight NATO then? Has anyone thought about it?"
Another possible option would be to "draw Ukraine into NATO, deploy offensive weapons there" and encourage Ukrainian nationalists to use force to reclaim the rebel-held east or Crimea, "drawing us into a military conflict," Putin
5/"claimed."
Putin said (not verbatim): "If Ukraine joined NATO and attempts to use military action to take Crimea by force, then all of NATO would be at war w/ Russia."
THIS IS THE VOICE OF PURE REASON/LOGIC/RATIONALITY. This 'special military action' by Russia to force Ukraine
6/into a non-aligned status then is to PREVENT a conflict b/t NATO and Russia over an attempt by Ukraine to take back Crimea thru military action. The logic of Putin is sound while the West is beset w/ a form of madness believing the fiction that Putin is "rebuilding his empire".
Russia claims focus now on seizing eastern Ukraine, not Kyiv
“Top Russian military officials said Friday the operation in Ukraine was entering a new phase focused on the "complete liberation" of the eastern Donbas region." threadreaderapp.com/thread/1508293…
2/Which is more rational? To believe this report by the Russians which is aimed at both domestic and international audiences? Or the US’s second-guessing of Russia’s statement claiming that, clearly, Russia’s goal had been to capture Kyiv in 3 days and install a puppet gov’t that
3/would do Moscow’s bidding, but failed spectacularly, and now has altered its narrative to make it appear as if Russia hasn’t failed? Well if you believe that Washington has enough ESP to read Moscow’s mind you’ll go w/ US’s second guessing. Yet US’s psychological projection
2/“Top Russian military officials said Friday the operation in Ukraine was entering a new phase focused on the "complete liberation" of the eastern Donbas region, claiming Russia's assault on cities like Kyiv was part of a strategy to distract Ukrainian forces.”
3/This could be true, explaining why the miles-long column of military vehicles dropping in from Belarus manned by conscripts bogged down: it was by design.
“U.S. officials believed [however that] Russia's original objectives [had always been] regime change and long-term control
Russia plans a ‘Korean scenario’ for Ukraine: Intelligence chief | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera aje.io/cp6wts via @AJEnglish
2/“Russia is considering “a Korean scenario” for Ukraine and splitting the country in two after failing to seize the capital Kyiv and overthrow its government, the Ukrainian military intelligence chief has said.”
Or the “Korean scenario” is simply the 2nd Phase of Russia’s
3/“special military operation”, kicked into gear by Ukraine’s refusal to accept the 6 stated terms of cease-fire Russia put on the table:
DPRK's Way Of Peace Through Strength To Protect Its Homeland & Defend Its Sovereignty:
President of State Affairs Kim Jong Un has photo session with those conducive to successful test-firing of new-type ICBM
Date: 28/03/2022 | Source: Voice of Korea (EN) kcnawatch.org/newstream/1648…
2/"“We should become strong. We should be strong by all means to defend peace and speed up the socialist construction, not affected by any threat, and be responsible for the security of the rising generations."
Kim Jong Un expressed the Party's will of building a powerful
3/"defense capability once again to defend the security and future of the country and people with the absolute strength, the strategic strength which has got firmer and more perfect and powerful.
He continued: Genuine defense capability is just a powerful offensive ability. When
Russia Has A Justification For Invading Ukraine: A Preemptive Attack To Force Ukrainian Non-Alignment In The Name Of Self-Defense Meets The Carolina Test
Putin: Russia will be dragged into war if Ukraine joins NATO @TRTWorldtrtworld.com/europe/putin-r…
Joe Biden's response is simply that Putin is a dictator bent on rebuilding the Russian Empire. The egregious failure of Washington to understand Putin & the Russian Federation's concerns over NATO's encroaching upon its very borders is at the ROOT of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Translation: It's better to resolve your beef w/ Ukraine over Crimea & the Donbass region BEFORE Ukraine joins NATO when the conflict WON'T escalate into WW3. A Russia-Ukraine conflict that doesn't become WW3 is better than one that does become WW3 by triggering Article 5.
“The ideology of the OUN is described as similar to Italian Fascism. The OUN sought to infiltrate legal political parties, universities and other political structures and institutions. The OUN's strategies to achieve Ukrainian independence included en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizat…
2/“violence and terrorism against perceived foreign and domestic enemies, particularly Poland, Czechoslovakia, the Kingdom of Romania, and the Soviet Union…
A number of contemporary far-right Ukrainian political organizations claim to be inheritors of the OUN's political
3/“traditions, including Svoboda, Right Sector, the Ukrainian National Assembly – Ukrainian National Self Defence, and the Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists. The role of the OUN remains contested in historiography, as these later political inheritors developed a literature