Ah professional services. The typical #prodmgmt rejoinder whenever anyone mentions a specific client request. How dare anyone request things! None of us really want to go down this route, but what about when we have to?

🧵 What about that shadowy place way out there?  That's profess
It's no secret why we don't want this. Specific client requests are rarely validated, over-specific, create tech and product debt, and can make products into a messy pile of features. And above all else there's the opportunity cost
However, sometimes you're going to get bullied by a client several orders of magnitude bigger than you, or get pressure from the top to accommodate such a request. There can be good & bad reasons for this, but let's just assume you need to do it. How? Some thoughts...
Treat as discovery input. It's quite possible there's an unmet need here. Do a little digging. Speak directly to the customer/prospect & do the JTBD dance. Ask yourself... Is there a valuable, generic feature I can make out of this? Remember to speak to other customers too!
If you have to do this work, everything's an OR not an AND. Be specific about what's not getting done. The naive view is that protects the roadmap and the request goes away. That won't (always) happen but steer clear of "it's only" or "it's just" type conversations
MVP the heck out of it. Work out the smallest version of that thing that could claim to answer the client request with a straight face, build that & then pause. Maybe they'll be ok with whatever you built, maybe there'll be more rounds, but don't just build everything for months
But who's doing the work? @RichMironov has described "bespoke consultancy at product rates"... You don't want to do that. On the other hand, do you really want to take explicit consulting fees for client work? Doesn't that make it worse? Maybe
It's common to see people recommend allocating X% of time to custom requests. This seems like a neat option, better than random chaos. My problem here is that it's easy to try to push outside of X and anything with % allocations can quickly add to more than 100
Another option is to build a separate professional services team. They're either developing stuff alongside the product team, or hopefully just doing configuration customisations. This is neater and protects product time but if you don't have enough work for them it's inefficient
A great option if it's more about bespoke integrations & customisation is to strike up a relationship with an integration partner. They get trained in your stuff and can go out and do all the shoveling for you! You get a cut + the recurring license money. I really like this one
Whatever you do, you need to track success of these "initiatives". Did you actually win the sale? What other stuff didn't happen? How did that impact product health? What happened to retention / satisfaction etc? You need to represent the true cost of custom work
But on the other hand, you haven't failed because you had to do custom work. Maybe you missed something in discovery (or maybe your discovery was just "whatever our first clients asked for"). You want to get ahead of the curve on this but we work for businesses not books

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Knight

Jason Knight Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @onejasonknight

Jan 28
Let's talk about mental health in #prodmgmt because, whatever some naysayers might say, this is an incredibly tricky job. Even when it's going well it's hard! And it's very often not going well 🧵
Part of me wonders if this is down to many of the big books, you all know the ones, painting an aspirational vision of what product management is & what a product company should be. And, don't get me wrong, I *want* to work for one of those places. But they are few & far between
And, let's face it, even working for companies like that is hard. None of them say product management is easy! So, let's be clear, even in idealistically run, by the book companies, your average product manager's life is going to be incredibly difficult
Read 11 tweets
Jan 13
Combining two mentoring sessions that had similar themes - that tricky situation where the engineering team and product team are misaligned, and this is affecting the progress of the product & dissatisfying customers

#prodmgmt

🧵
So in this age of empowerment & product trios we should call out the key responsibilities of the 2 teams, broadly:

• Product team owns the why & the when, based on market & customer understanding
• Dev teams owns the what & the how, what's possible and the effort involved
The "what" is more of a shared responsibility between dev & UX & product, but the key here is that we want devs to work with us collaboratively to define a solution that is technically feasible, business viable, customer usable (and ethically defensible)
Read 11 tweets
Jan 11
From today's mentoring, talking about the need from leadership to constantly race forward and building new stuff (for competitive advantage / keep sales happy / make clients excited etc). It's a common problem that I've come to refer to as the Barbarossa problem

#prodmgmt 🧵
Operation Barbarossa was Hitler's attempt to overtake Russia by reaching Moscow at lightning speed. It was risky but had high rewards. It also failed spectacularly, as we all now know. The reasons were many, but I'll cherry pick the ones that make my point
A big part of the problem with Barbarossa was that Hitler's army moved faster than their supply lines could keep up. This meant that their troops were isolated and eventually cut off. They got within sight of Moscow but ultimately got bogged down and ultimately repelled.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 10
From recent mentoring session, "I want to advance my #prodmgmt career and step away from individual contribution but am not sure how to do it in my current company". The eternal challenge! For me it's not (just) about job titles, but proximity to strategic decision making 🧵
If you have ambitions to be a product leader (and let's assume you know what types of thing that involves & have identified it's where you want to be) in your current company you have to ask yourself ... what's my path in this current company?
Job titles don't matter (idealistically) but job titles also really matter (in the real world). Who's in front of you? If you have a Senior PM then a Head then a VP then a CPO then, hey, there's a path but all the places are filled. You're probably in for a wait!
Read 6 tweets
Jan 8
From mentoring session today - "is it normal for PMs to work 50-60 hours a week? how can I avoid burnout?"

I mean this is obviously a tricky one and a lot of it depends ony why you're so busy, but my biggest piece of advice is.. let go of some stuff! Wait, what?

#prodmgmt

🧵
A few reasons you might be overloaded

• The company / team is understaffed
• You're being made to do stuff that isn't really your job
• You're going down rabbit holes and not giving up

All of these are solvable but they're all difficult to one degree or another
If you're understaffed and stuff needs doing, someone's got to do it right? You could argue you need more staff, or that you need less stuff. I'm always going to be in favour of less stuff because it's easier to make a big impact on fewer things than more things
Read 12 tweets
Jan 7
From tonight's mentoring session, an interesting one with an education leader who is not "in product" (although thinking very much in product terms). Looking at making an impact with productising aspects of education and wondering how to apply product thinking

#prodmgmt 🧵
In this case I do my best @davidjbland impression (my mentee already had David's book!) and talking about the importance of finding out whether your idea is good, and that it's much easier to make a mistake of it's a small one
I've had situations in my product career where I've gone all in way to soon, with predictably disappointing results. The key rule of making bets; if you are off course by 1 degree, it's easy to correct sooner rather than later (by which time you're in a different State)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(