A thought thread on the most remarkable thing of the war--here we are more than a month in this, and the Ukrainians are openly transporting equipment on major roads under clear blue skies. This represents an almost total failure of Russian airpower.
And as this is a captured Russian piece of equipment, it would have to be relatively close to the place of capture, so we are talking near the war zone.
This cuts both ways, there are pictures of Russian columns operating in the open in clear skies--yes they can get attacked but they can also operate much of the time.
Why is this interesting? 1) it might be that this air war is extremely rare as well an unexpected. As the Russians have been denied air supremacy, but the Ukrainians dont have the ability to take it either, we are witnessing the open maneuvering of land vehicles on both sides.
2) The more important point might be that this unusual air supremacy contest has obscured the vulnerability of the large heavy AFV. They (tanks) have been able to operate out in the open in this war on both sides more than they should, because of the weird air war balance.
So be wary about those arguing for the long-term value of the tank being retained. If either side in this war can ever gain air supremacy, the tanks of the other would have to operate far more cautiously and would be destroyed in an even higher number than they are now.
As part of this, I think we can start to understand what the Ukrainians have done to Russian airpower. They havent stopped it per se--they have stopped it from flying search and destroy/patrolling missions. What do I mean from this?
Russian aircraft are still flying over Ukraine, but they are flying very cautiously, seemingly to fulfil a specific mission which mostly involves dropping (dumb) bombs on stationary targets (buildings, depots, etc).
What they seem to be unable to do is patrol or fly search/destroy missions using intelligence to react quickly to reports of Ukrainian forces out in the open to try and attack them. They should have air assets always on hand to try and attack Ukrainian targets when they appear.
But they dont regularly seem to do this. So Russian airpower has been severely hampered by taking away its flexibility to patrol and forcing it to fly specific missions in as cautious a way as possible. We have not seen an airpower campaign like this in airpower history.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phillips P. OBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillipsPOBrien

Mar 30
An article that outlines what Russia might be facing in terms of personnel--too few soldiers at hand to reinforce their efforts in Ukraine quickly. Helps put its finger on the heart of the dilemma facing Putin. nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russ…
Having deployed 75% of his best combat troops (BTGs) and maybe 70% of all Russian military power to the stalled invasion, what is left to deploy would certainly not be enough to take Kyiv.(And it must be remembered would basically leave Russia defenceless everywhere else)
It might be enough to try and occupy much of Donetsk-Luhansk, but that would be it. And at that point the Russian army would have been fully deployed. Thats the fundamental reason time is on Ukraine's side.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 29
This might be counter-intuitive, but the mediocre (to be kind) performance of the Russian military in Kyiv means that Europe and the USA do not need to rush out and spend billions more right away on their militaries. It means they have a window to plan for the future.
They should do this properly. Learn the lessons of this conflict, not waste money on systems that could be of questionable value (tanks?), and take advantage of the significant security window Russia is giving them.
There are a number of fundamental questions that need to be analyzed before we rush off to spend billions and billions. Even before looking at the war we need to start with these two:
Read 11 tweets
Mar 29
First Battle of Kyiv looks to be truly over. That is actually momentous. Whatever happens now we are talking about a limited war time and geography-wise--unless we think Russia has the will and resources to conscript, train and arm an entirely new army.
If the Russians are pulling back from Kyiv (which looks likely), coming back will be very very hard without basically societal mobilization. They will probably divert all remaining combat worthy forces to try and consolidate Donbass and East.
Worth noting that this also means Russia is dropping its plan for Odessa--unless something remarkable happens.
Read 16 tweets
Mar 29
New stories that Russia will have to accept Ukraine in the EU if Ukraine stays out of NATO. I hope people understand that if this happens, its a major victory for Ukraine.
There are alot of people saying--but the EU wont let Ukraine in right away. In a pre-Feb 24 world Im sure they are right. However, I wonder if we are underestimating the impact of Feb 24 on Europe. The EU always hedged on Ukraine because they safely knew Russia objected
If the EU turns around now, after what the Ukrainians have sacrificed for the right to join the EU and says no to membership--it will seem extraordinarily petty and a rejection of everything that the EU should stand for.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 28
Weirdest story of the day. Which makes most sense.
1) someone in Abramovich's entourage poisoned everyone and got his boss (by accident?)
2) Abramovich tried to poison the Ukrainians and got himself too.
3) Russian intelligence poisoned their own delegation to get the Ukrainians.
Has Abramovich been back in Russia since then? Maybe it was an attempt on him. I remember he flew to Istanbul a while ago. What a strange, strange story.
Reuters reporting it was environmental factors, so the great mystery is maybe not so mysterious.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 28
This is all true, but you could write the same story for almost every major European country and the USA.
You have USA (Trump administration), UK (money laundering extraordinaire plus funding of governing party), Italy (huge support for populist movement-Salvini) France (NF, far left), to go along with Germany
Whats weird is that many people seem to delight in pointing out people doing Putin's work in other countries, but they dont spend nearly as much time honestly evaluating their own systems.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(