Ok I'm starting a grim 🧵 of gross stats & facts to have on hand for #Budget2022

In December 2019, 76.5% of people on Newstart (557,395) had relied on income support for more than a year. This has gone up by 41%!!! It's now 786,139 people (83.84% of all people on JobSeeker).
The unemployment rate hasn't been this low since before the global financial crisis in 2008 when it was also 4%.

BUT the proportion of working age people who rely on an unemployment payment has nearly doubled – from 3.3% in mid-2008 compared to about 5.9% today. #Budget2022
For each entry level job advertised in February 2022 there are about 23 people who've been on an unemployment payment for more than 12 months.

Don't forget: you're also competing with applicants who aren't on a payment or are short-term unemployed. #Budget2022
Between July 2020 & June 2021 only 26.3% of people in jobactive Stream C got a job – only 29% of those were permanent.

11.1% were employed full-time 3 months after getting a job.

This includes people who found their own job without the help of their job agency. #Budget2022
When we look at everyone in jobactive, not just Stream C (people with "higher barriers to work") only 9% of people on the JobSeeker payment were employed full-time after 3 months in a job.

Again, this includes people who found their own job.

The jobs fucking suck. #Budget2022
You know how the government & media always pretend like payments to unemployed people make up a huge % of the budget?

Welp, FY20 unemployment payments were 3.48% of all spending ($18.7b). In FY19, the last year before COVID distorted figures, it was 2.15% ($10.5 b) #Budget2022
Some cool stuff the government included in last year's budget instead of making welfare payments higher:

💰 $197m for the new 6-month Work for the Dole
💰 $2.5m on the 'DobSeeker' employer reporting line
💰 $24m on investigations for welfare “fraud & non-compliance” #Budget2022
And of course we don't know how much they pissed away forcing income control on (mostly) Blak folks in violation of their rights, cos the government keeps that secret every year 🤐

Can't wait to see some radical transparency on #CashlessDebitCard in #Budget2022!
In April 2021 the government cut JobSeeker, the most common working age payment, down to $310 a week.

It's now $46 a day – about ½ the Henderson poverty line. But the poverty line was last updated in September, so we know it's far worse now with recent price hikes. #Budget2022
In February 2020 there were 66,800 people on Newstart (now JobSeeker) who had employment income.

In February 2022 there were 184,751 people on JobSeeker who had employment income.

Surely that's good? Nope. Jobs shouldn't suck so bad that you can't escape poverty. #Budget2022
In 2020, when JobSeeker and other payments were lifted to the poverty line, @ACOSS found 33% of people still regularly skipped meals. 40% couldn't afford meds medication and adequate healthcare.

When payments were AT THE POVERTY LINE. #Budget2022
@ACOSS JobSeeker is currently $292 a week below the Henderson poverty line – last updated for September 2021, before wild price increases really kicked in.

This $250 payment won't even get someone above the poverty line for a SINGLE week.

Let me know if you have thoughts about it and want to share 👇

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with kristin #BTPM (she/her)

kristin #BTPM (she/her) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kristin8X

Mar 30
It’s going to be voted on in the senate soon folks 😢

aph.gov.au/Watch_Read_Lis…
It’s on now. Louise Pratt from Labor explaining that they’re supporting.
Pratt says ACOSS say we’re better off passing the bill than not passing it.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 28
The MOs Bill is back & the government's desperate to get it done before an election.

You can't put lipstick on a pig.

ACOSS are pushing for some changes that will mean small improvements, but fundamentally this bill is bad & should be opposed.

Here's why to #RejectTheMOsBill👇
Don't lock in a bad system. We hope if Labor win government there's a chance for meaningful change. If this bill passes then any opportunity to work on substantive improvements will be significantly diminished. They've extended jobactive before & can do so again #RejectTheMOsBill
Changes that make savings from social security & unemployed people should be opposed.

The effect of changes in this bill will save $860 million in employment services over the forward estimates & another $191 million in payments recouped due to payment backdating changes.
Read 30 tweets
Jan 19
🧵

@PatrickGormanMP published an abhorrent, self-serving piece claiming Labor leads a war on poverty.

Labor aren't "for the poor" & they haven’t been in my lifetime. This is designed to prime people to think there's a small cohort of ppl in rare circumstances living in poverty.
I was stunned but not surprised to read Gorman's article, which is mostly a grab bag of ALP policies that aren't related to poverty. It doesn't mention unemployment or JobSeeker once.

Below is some of what I felt upon it 👇

ty @bkjabour for publishing it
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
This table shows the gap between poverty line & unemployment payments growing faster under the ALP than Coalition

Red/orange/green columns are the rate as % of HPL. Blue & re for which party was in gov & how much more or less below the poverty line the payment was for that time Screencap of spreadsheet showing changes in the Henderson po
Read 7 tweets
Jan 13
🧵 #BTPM

Hi folks, someone shared a story with us today that spells out perfectly the absolute WORK of being unemployed, even in a pandemic.

They've kindly agreed to let me share it. It shows how folks lose days and days managing dumb requirements just to TRY and stay safe.
Note: this is about a DES provider. That's the DISABILITY employment service.

Yesterday this (un)employment provider insisted that the person attend an IN PERSON appointment in a few days' time, despite spiralling COVID cases.

A familiar story, we know.
This person rightly wants to keep themselves safe and started to figure out how to avoid doing a face-to-face appointment.

Here's absurd/byzantine process they needed to do ... just so they could stay home IN A PANDEMIC 👇
Read 28 tweets
Jan 7
Let's break down how absurd this is.

Jeremy currently lives in a very small town near the border of 2 "employment regions" – arbitrary boundaries made by the gov.

He's just inside the Bendigo ER, moving to Ballarat ER. From a town of ~4k ppl to a city of more than 100,000.
The reason this will have been flagged in the system is because the Bendigo and Ballarat *employment regions* – meaningless boundaries – have different unemployment rates.

Bendigo ER has an unemployment rate of 4.3% and 7500 people in jobactive. Ballarat is 4% and 6800.
Bendigo ER working age pop is 102k ppl. Ballarat: 104k.

These places. Are basically. The same.

He's moving from a town of 4k ppl, so what difference does it make to his prospects whether he moves an hr in one direction or an hr in the other?

None. They just want to punish him.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 7
To be extremely clear: the gov restricts freedom of movement for ppl on JS

1 of the many problems w the MOs bill they tried & failed to force through: the dept couldn't answer my q about how new 'incentives' to relocate interact w rules that *prevent* ppl choosing where to live.
There are obviously many problems with rules that punish people for moving.

First and foremost: it is a human rights violation.

2nd: People are prevented from moving somewhere where it might be easier to survive on the JS pittance.

3rd: It traps people in unsafe situations.
4th: There are many reasons poor ppl go to the GREAT EXPENSE of moving. Such as accessing healthcare or being closer to family/other supports that help them survive on JobSeeker.

5th: Long-term unemployed ppl are actively prevented from gaining skills by perverse MO requirements
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(