New stories that Russia will have to accept Ukraine in the EU if Ukraine stays out of NATO. I hope people understand that if this happens, its a major victory for Ukraine.
There are alot of people saying--but the EU wont let Ukraine in right away. In a pre-Feb 24 world Im sure they are right. However, I wonder if we are underestimating the impact of Feb 24 on Europe. The EU always hedged on Ukraine because they safely knew Russia objected
If the EU turns around now, after what the Ukrainians have sacrificed for the right to join the EU and says no to membership--it will seem extraordinarily petty and a rejection of everything that the EU should stand for.
Moreover, it would be remarkably stupid. The EU has a chance, if it integrates Ukraine successfully, to (stealing a military phrase) culminate its operations. Ukraine in opens up the possibility of Belarus and (shockingly) Russia.
Who knows how Russia will develop? It will be faced with a choice of being a Chinese vassal or, if it gets its act together, the largest member of the EU. I know their is alot of anger shown to Russians these days, but the younger ones I have met would all prefer the EU.
Maybe the EU is stupid enough to turn down Ukraine. I really hope not.
Before the Berlin Wall came down, the idea of Eastern European countries in the EC would have seemed far fetched. However major geopolitical events can transform expectations.
This is either the greatest deception of the war by the Russians or a sign that a deal is closer than we were thinking. If Putin agrees to meet with Zelensky, it would only be because the parameters of a deal are there.
What's happening around Kharkiv recently is telling us alot about how the war could develop in the next few weeks. For those who dont know, Kharkiv is the second largest city in Ukraine (pop before the war of almost 1.5 million, with a large Russian speaking population.
Taking Kharkiv seemed to be an early high priority objective of the Russians, as the city is not far from the border with Russia and in Putin's worldview would probably have been the centre of pro-Russian identity in Ukraine.
However the Russian assault stalled around Kharkiv and the Russian army, not willing to engage in street by street fighting, chose the tactics of cutting off the city and bombarding at distance. Some of the most terrible images of city bombardment at the start came from Kharkiv.
An article that outlines what Russia might be facing in terms of personnel--too few soldiers at hand to reinforce their efforts in Ukraine quickly. Helps put its finger on the heart of the dilemma facing Putin. nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russ…
Having deployed 75% of his best combat troops (BTGs) and maybe 70% of all Russian military power to the stalled invasion, what is left to deploy would certainly not be enough to take Kyiv.(And it must be remembered would basically leave Russia defenceless everywhere else)
It might be enough to try and occupy much of Donetsk-Luhansk, but that would be it. And at that point the Russian army would have been fully deployed. Thats the fundamental reason time is on Ukraine's side.
This might be counter-intuitive, but the mediocre (to be kind) performance of the Russian military in Kyiv means that Europe and the USA do not need to rush out and spend billions more right away on their militaries. It means they have a window to plan for the future.
They should do this properly. Learn the lessons of this conflict, not waste money on systems that could be of questionable value (tanks?), and take advantage of the significant security window Russia is giving them.
There are a number of fundamental questions that need to be analyzed before we rush off to spend billions and billions. Even before looking at the war we need to start with these two:
First Battle of Kyiv looks to be truly over. That is actually momentous. Whatever happens now we are talking about a limited war time and geography-wise--unless we think Russia has the will and resources to conscript, train and arm an entirely new army.
If the Russians are pulling back from Kyiv (which looks likely), coming back will be very very hard without basically societal mobilization. They will probably divert all remaining combat worthy forces to try and consolidate Donbass and East.
Worth noting that this also means Russia is dropping its plan for Odessa--unless something remarkable happens.
A thought thread on the most remarkable thing of the war--here we are more than a month in this, and the Ukrainians are openly transporting equipment on major roads under clear blue skies. This represents an almost total failure of Russian airpower.
And as this is a captured Russian piece of equipment, it would have to be relatively close to the place of capture, so we are talking near the war zone.
This cuts both ways, there are pictures of Russian columns operating in the open in clear skies--yes they can get attacked but they can also operate much of the time.
Weirdest story of the day. Which makes most sense. 1) someone in Abramovich's entourage poisoned everyone and got his boss (by accident?) 2) Abramovich tried to poison the Ukrainians and got himself too. 3) Russian intelligence poisoned their own delegation to get the Ukrainians.
Has Abramovich been back in Russia since then? Maybe it was an attempt on him. I remember he flew to Istanbul a while ago. What a strange, strange story.
Reuters reporting it was environmental factors, so the great mystery is maybe not so mysterious.